Ofcom has proposed removing licence requirements from a handful of frequency bands, releasing microwave links and short-range radios, not to mention personal locator beacons, from the licensing burden. The proposals (45-page PDF/253KB, very dull indeed) follow a consultation published back in April to remove licence requirements …
Like Wi-Fi Brand Bands...
...strict licensing standards for hardware makers should mollify spectrum neighbors.
The free public bands are the most profitable to a government due to increased productivity and taxes on gear.
>Satellite operators did raise some concerns about the unlicensed use of 3.4-3.8GHs,
Why didnt you just say Sky ?
it's not just the evil Murdoch empire that uses that segment.
Not used by TV
Sky, and Freesat, broadcast in the 10 GHz - 12.75 GHz range. Uplink to the satellites is in 14 - 18 GHz. These bands will remain regulated with licensing required.
Sky did not respond to the consultation.
Inmarsat were concerned about licence-exemption at 2 GHz. Intelsat were concerned about C-band fixed satellite service: http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/licence-exemption/responses/Intelsat_response.pdf .
- +Analysis Microsoft: We're making ONE TRUE WINDOWS to rule us all
- Climate: 'An excuse for tax hikes', scientists 'don't know what they're talking about'
- Analysis Nadella: Apps must run on ALL WINDOWS – PCs, slabs and mobes
- Apple: We'll unleash OS X Yosemite beta on the MASSES July 24
- Yorkshire cops fail to grasp principle behind BT Fon Wi-Fi network