A Mississippi woman has accused Facebook of violating federal wiretap statutes by tracking her internet browsing history even when she wasn't logged onto the social networking site. In a lawsuit filed on Wednesday in federal court in the northern district of Mississippi, Brooke Rutledge of Lafayette County, Mississippi, also …
My only question is ...
Why do people expect that multi-billion$currency marketing corporations won't take advantage of any and all personal details that are freely given to them?
The mind absolutely boggles ... Use !GooMyFaceYouMSiTwit at your own peril ... They are only in it for their gain, not your personal welfare.
Even if you expect it, doesn't make it right or legal.
I do admire when the US legal system gives even the 'small guy' some teeth.
They will use it for their gain
Which is why application of the law is needed to restrain their behaviour.
Unfortunately US law seems to leave them with gums in cases like this. So far they've all been thrown out because they can't identify a specific loss with a dollar value. In the eyes of the law your privacy is worthless.
the Spanish Inquisition!
I hope she sues.
Anything that would bring about the death of Facebook is always a good thing.
She has sued.
That was the entire point of the article.
So everyone can move to google+, run by the company that doesnt even *pretend* to respect your privacy?
Sorry I don't get it. Why do people feel they have to use "social networking" at all? The weird thing is that most of the obsessive FB users I know talk to their FB friends regularly anyway. Take for example the bunch of FB mums we get in the school playground every morning. They used to talk about their lives, now they do so at one remove. They talk about what they have read about each other on FB. Sometimes it's almost like listening to them talk about each other as third parties.
Keeping in touch with people you don't see regularly? We have phones and email for that.
Social networking is a solution to a problem that nobody even thought they had until social networking cam along.
I have Ghostery (all major browsers: http://www.ghostery.com/) and Incognito (Safari http://www.orbicule.com/incognito/) installed to prevent this from happening.
I have various domains blacklisted, including Facebook. One news site became almost unusable when they killed their own comments board and replaced it with Facebook, and at that point I just had to add Facebook to /dev/null
Enrichment of what? Facebook, its affiliates, or the users' web browsing experience?
Potentially tainted technology?
I suppose tracking cookies have some usefulness were the end user made aware (log in to a computer and all my tracking goodness appears onscreen?)
But this pseudo-spying sort of stuff needs to evaporate from service provider's menu as a matter of priority.
For instance: suppose it were the Police that used the tracker upon citizens/subjects.
Even worse still?
Suppose it were the Police of another nation on another continent.
Suppose it were a state-run secretive security type organisation that tracked as Facebook?
Who would be happy then?
"not all of the data sent back to the social networking site is logged."
Is listening to an illegal wire tap through headphones wildly different from recording it on tape?
In ya face Zuckerberg
I can confirm that Facebook et al violate their own Ts & Cs
I have set up Facebork to disallow 3rd party websites from accessing my identity. In other words, my Facebork account is locked down. Most (almost all) websites with those annoying Facebork frames obey this and display a random collection of faces of people I don't know.
But on two occassions I've seen *my* face and *my Facebook Friends* staring out at me on 3rd party websites.
Facebook violating privacy, data hoarding, tracking, yadda yadda yadda (yawn)
Indeed. But does that mean that people shouldn't try to do something about it?
Me, myself, I do something about it.
I don't visit those sites.
I invite all y'all to similarly ignore the marketards of the world ...
You don't visit sites which have a Facebook 'Like' button?
Scroll to the bottom of the page, and slap yourself in the face.
No need to go that far
Ad Block and no script in Firefox do a pretty good job of fixing those little problems.
::scrolls to bottom of page::
Nope. Nothing facetube-ish there. I wonder why you're seeing it? Smoking wacky tabacky again? Or perhaps your Rye is mildewed ...
Er, try going back to the article and looking at the top of the page. I see "tweet" and "like". What do you see?
Print Comment 401 The web site is blocked by administrator 401 The web site is blocked by administrator Alert
Then the rest of the page displays as normal. Wasn't hard, suspect it wasn't hard for anyone else either.
No YouFaceTube stuff there, either.
Seriously, I'll never click on such a thing, so I block 'em. Saves bandwith for both me, and for ElReg.
That's why I have cookies disabled, and only enable them for specific domains. That plus privacy enhancing adblock filters and I feel much more comfortable browsing the web.
Disabing 3rd party cookies should prevent this sort of thing (?).
"Wednesday's complaint is the latest to seek redress for alleged privacy violations that result from cookies and other files that websites use to track the browsing habits of their visitors."
Or more likely,
"Wednesday's complaint is the latest to seek to cash in, and the lawyers are looking for any one to join who can bolster their fees."
No matter how much you dislike FB,
this suit should be dismissed with extreme prejudice. The whole point of clicking on a "Like" button on a website is to link it to YOUR profile, which must necessarily provide the company which provided the "Like" button with said information.
Part of the problem is that it tracks you even if you don't click on the "like" button, just if you visit a site that has the "like" button on it.