The EU's top digital eurocrat has called on large telcos to stop using copper pricing as a barrier to deploying fibre networks. "Telecom operators are divided on the question of how copper access prices affect the incentives for fibre investment," said Neelie Kroes during a speech in Brussels today. "Alternative operators …
Just a plain old excuse as usual
"it costs too much" Cooper vs Glass - Let me guess, this person left uni with a degree in something useful but not the skill in telling the difference of glass against metal!?!
Good ol' Broadband (Victorian) Britain!
The European Commission has launched a study of European broadband speed, in association with SamKnows, and needs up to 10,000 consumers to measure their home internet performance. They are looking for volunteers across Europe, who can sign up at: http://www.samknows.eu
Rickard, on behalf of SamKnows
With copper prices so high...
... why don't they lay down fibre replacements, take out the copper, and flog it to offset the costs?
Copper would be nice
Just had BT remaking a joint between copper and aluminium to restore service. Aluminium was introduced late 70s/early 80s due to copper prices and by 1986 had proved to be a maintenance nightmare. Yet over 30 years on we still suffer lousy broadband in the Yorkshire Dales because BT has yet to catch up copper let alone fibre. Cables used to be depreciated financially over 20 years so they've had their wear out aluminum
"Could kill innovative new offers"
Yeah, more innovative ways for ISPs to try and get more £/Euros/$ out of the same dead horse
Rip out the copper
Rip out the copper anyway, and sell it off as scrap... Should make some decent change selling the copper, and you can claim subsidies and charge higher prices for laying the fibre.
Telcos vs. tealeafs
As copper prices rise a really switched-on telco would realise that replacing stolen copper is a mugs game. A better idea would be to flog off their copper *before* it gets nicked and use the proceeds to finance the fibre that replaces it.
Profits? They'd result from not having to pay the costs and overtime that occur each time their copper is stolen.
and even then, the chavs will rip up the fibre thinking it's copper
If copper access is so unreasonably high priced then why isn't competition moving in to clean their clocks?
net neut facts?
Whether to support net neutrality is surely not about facts. You do it (or not) for political reasons. What indisputable 'fact' can decide net neutrality is applicable or not. There's the fact that most people want free unfettered access to services and there are companies that do not. Only opinion (passionate or otherwise) that can decide it and the Dutch have. Good for them (whether you agree or not).
a politician on the corp take
No surprise here.
- DAYS from end of life as we know it: Boffins tell of solar storm near-miss
- Put down that Oracle database patch: It could cost $23,000 per CPU
- Bose says today IS F*** With Dre Day: Beats sued in patent battle
- The END of the FONDLESLAB KINGS? Apple and Samsung have reason to FEAR
- Review Porsche Panamera S E-Hybrid: The plug-in for plutocrats