Vegetarians looking online for lovers who have the same dietary preferences as they do were misled by dating site VeggieDates.com, the Advertising Standards Authority ruled today. The ASA has demanded that the homepage of VeggieDates be changed to reflect the fact that most of its members were neither vegetarian nor vegan. The …
They can search on atributes, but
cant search on a tick-box that says I am a veggie/non-veggie?
I need to know what technology they are using so that I NEVER buy it for my organisation.
It was explained in the article. It wasn't a tech limitation but the fact that the profiles were pooled with other sites. Presumably they all used a standard template profile format with no allowance for custom fields.
Or the site was too lazy to pursue an agreed change to the profile for all sites.
Thank you for demonstrating your lack of knowledge.
If profiles on VeggieDates have an attribute that says 'Veggie' or 'Vegan', then it can be searched on, even if the other sites in the pool do not have a corresponding profile attribute. Searches initiated from any other site in the pool may not know of the attribute, and will then not allow you to select on that, but searches initiated from VeggieDates should know about that attribute and automatically drop any profile from elsewhere in the pool.
If they use a search that only deals with a lowest common denominator, profile-wise, then VeggieDates admins are no more intelligent than the plants they're eating.
It's really very simple
$sql = "SELECT * FROM customers WHERE flags & ".$is_vegan." AND sex = '".$sexual_preference."' AND age > ".$min_age." AND age < ".$max_age." ORDER BY enroldate";
I don't see why there's a problem here.
is pretty tame but the idea of speciality dating sites sharing a common pool of members is terrifying.
I can image carrot munchers joining this site and finding thier details appearing on more exotic dating sites that share a single global pool of members.
If employers did a search for your details and say found you on an "odd" dating site, this could wreck your chances of a good job.
"tame"!? I rather think not
As for being passed onto more exotic sites, it's a short step from carrot muncher to rug muncher that's been the ruin of many.
I think Vagi-eaters disagree!
"is pretty tame but the idea of speciality dating sites sharing a common pool of members is terrifying."
I know of dating site that started sharing it's pool of members with a dating site specializing in homosexual dating. At one point the filter on the homosexual dating site failed and some heterosexual members started getting propositions from members of the same gender they were not at all interested in.
"I know of.."
"a frustrated Veggie Dates member who discovered that the majority of other singles on the site in fact enjoyed eating dead animals"
Not all bad - better to discover that than that your date enjoys eating live animals, surely?
Have to wonder how VeggieDates expected to get away with this one...
...Darwin trying to help veggies/vegans overcome their biological weaknesses?
(waits for downvotes)
Very misleading, indeed
I thought veggies referred to vegetables: as in rich, old and comatose.
The perfect husband: 98 years old, 30 million quid in the checking account and 40° fever.
"It had not been possible"
My ass; "We were much too incompetent."
Veggie's upset? Something smells bad about that.
Never mind I'm sure it'l blow over.
So they already had "is a vegetarian" as a field in the database
Surely only returning vegetarians would have required modifying all of say 1 fucking line of code.
I think "not possible to implement" most likely translates as either "we pay someone else to run out dating network and don't have a fucking clue how it works" or alternatively "we sold all your info to a 3rd party dating site"
Why Vern, what is that smell? - ayup, bullcrap
Unfortunately there was no filter to let people search for users who had ticked that option. Veggie Dates explained that it was a feature that they had intended to include but it had not been possible.
WTF - seriously? It's not possible to do a conditional search on your database to only return results where "user.veggie = 1"?
not if there is no user.veggie field
the common pool of dating profiles which the Veggie Dating site was using to bulk out its own membership list didn't have a field for food preferences therefore there was nothing to filter on for anyone who didn't register directly with the Veggie Dating site.
Am I the only one
who read that as 'meat goblins'?
It never fails to astonish me ...
... how gullible humanity as a whole really is.
Not heard of that word - can you check your dictionary and let me know what it says.
The first time I ran across that one was in "Reader's Digest" in about 1965. I'm absolutely certain it's much older than that.
Is this like
The dating site for people in uniform, and people who like people in uniform? Understood the advert basically saying at the end that regardless, anyone could join. Presumably discrimination ensues otherwise.
But... what's this got to do with escorts?
In most of these sites, the most attractive entries in the database belong to escorts who have signed up. Its a common tactic, they chat someone up and then when it comes to the meeting its... "Oh by the way do you have a contribution for my 'upkeep'" or similar... Its a remarkably successful ploy!
I always took the uniform dating advert to mean "twats and people who like twats" and thought it was a pretty good idea to keep them all in one place so they aren't spoiling things for other people.
Vegetablists are OK, but I couldn't eat a whole one.
No, but certain parts of certains individuals are quite pleasant.....
It's a database
All it needs is a field that indicates 0-Anorexic, 1-Vegan, 2-Vegetarian and 3-Omnivore. The filter would just look at that.. If they cannot do that, they have no access to their system or they are not capable of understanding the idea.
PS - having spent my college days there, I wonder if there might need to be an additional value - 4-Glaswegian
"Vegan" would be a sub-attribute to 0-Anorexic.
If this site is anything like other ones I've had dealings with, the code was written (badly) by some cheap php shop in Bangalore or Mumbai and the owners don't have a clue how it works. I was asked by owners of a similar site a couple of years ago to take a look to see if I could add some extra functionality and just looking through the site's code was enough to make me want to tear my eyes out and retire from programming forever!
surely you need 2 fields ?
with options sumin' like :-
field (1) anoxeric , correct-weight , obese
field (2) vegan, vegitarian , pescitarian, lacto-ovo-vegitarian , omnivore , carnivore
I can't see how you can mix up vegi / meat eaters with anorexics. There must surely be meat eating anorexics , ok they don't eat enough , but they still eat something .
I know someone who is a chkckenfishanerian, will they be catered for?
You need the "vegan level" field
You need a field for "vegan level":
level 0: I don't even chew my own fingernails.
level 1: I don't eat cute animals.
level 2: I don't eat ugly animals.
level 3: I don't eat anything with a face.
level 4: I don't eat anything with a body.
level 5: I don't eat anything with a shadow.
"Of course we serve vegetarians: what do you think cows are?" - sign in a restaurant in Jackson, Wy.
Since "omnivore" (from Latin: omni all, everything; vorare to devour)* seems to mean "eats everything", I'm at a loss to guess what Glaswegians eat that omnivores don't. Even deep-fried Mars bars and haggis seem to fall into the "everything" category.
Although, come to think of it, perhaps I'd rather not know.
Too much IT work and as a result.. Beer, has taken care of any claim to being waif.
Says it all, really.
Given that this is a dating website, some clarification might be needed here.
Does this mean that I can complain that Sex in the UK did not get me sex, and Girls Date for Free is discriminatory?
My date isn't a veggie
Given that this is the internet, if your date is the gender that you expect, that's a win.
... and if its the species you expect, you'll call it a draw?
I'd prefer a site that let me know if a prospective date enjoyed eating meat...
i got a feeling......
somone is telling pork....ies
that no one has posted the obligitory Paris remark...
I've been variously told that I'm not a vegetarian although I frequently eat plants with my steak.
Dunno, should I eat MORE plants ?? I already eat a lot of them.
You're not a real vegetarian unless you talk to your plants, and presumably apologise before eating them alive or boiling them to death (e.g. potatoes).
There are a whole bunch of similar sites...
... on Failbook offering dates according to whatever "targetted" information it can dredge out of your personal preferences.
Like Salsa Dancing? Join Salsa Dance Dating!
Like Real Ale? Join Real Ale Drinking Girls!
Like Computers? Too bad, sunshine!
Of course you have to pay to join and there's no guarantee that they'll actually find someone in your town/ country/ continent who's interested in the same thing...
Ooops, I thought it said vagitarian........
Well, I for one would love a date who would gobble my meat.
Obligatory iFan joke...
Hope the ASA takes up my case, Apple clearly advertised using the iPhone 4 to make calls!
- Top Gear Tigers and Bingo Boilers: Farewell then, Phones4U
- Breaking Fad 4K-ing excellent TV is on its way ... in its own sweet time, natch
- First Irish boy band U2. Now Apple pushes ANOTHER thing into iPhones, iPods, iPads
- Updated iOS 8 Healthkit gets a bug SO Apple KILLS it. That's real healthcare!
- Stephen Pie iPhone 6: Most exquisite MOBILE? NO, it's the Most Exquisite THING. EVER