Foxtel’s ambition to create a subscription TV monopoly with the $1.9bn takeover of rival Austar has been significantly dampened by the competition regulator. On Friday the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) released its ‘Statement of Issues’ on the takeover which provides the regulator’s preliminary views. …
It's not like they compete now... rather the country is divided into Austar areas and Foxtel areas without any overlap between the two.
I once rang Foxtel because they were advertising a better deal than Austar was providing, however I was told they "didn't cover my area". When I queried how they could possibly cover one suburb via Satelite, but couldn't cover the adjoining suburb via Satelite, I was told that my suburb was an "Austar" area and they were prevented from providing services in my area.
This is apparently approved by the ACCC, but merging the companies isn't?!?!
Not that I'm suggesting the merger is a good idea... rather these two companies should be force to compete on the basis of their products, instead of relying on protected markets. We might actually get some better products than the current rubbish they both offer.
ACCC and Australia
The only country where having more than 50% of a market or not competing is seen as "competitive" and not a monopoly.
- +Analysis Microsoft: We're making ONE TRUE WINDOWS to rule us all
- Climate: 'An excuse for tax hikes', scientists 'don't know what they're talking about'
- Apple: We'll unleash OS X Yosemite beta on the MASSES July 24
- Yorkshire cops fail to grasp principle behind BT Fon Wi-Fi network
- White? Male? You work in tech? Let us guess ... Twitter? We KNEW it!