The important question about moving to the cloud is: am I getting a good deal? It is easy to ask, but if you start to think about it in detail you might fancy a long lie down in a darkened room. For the purpose of this lightning tour of cloud economics, I’m making several big assumptions: The first is that you have access to …
IT is cheap. Lawyers aren't.
#1 consideration for me in any deployment is "what regulatory regime will my data be held under" ?
When you have to be able to satisfy FoIA, RIPA, SOX etc, entrusting your data to a third-party in a different jurisdiction is a spectacular business-risk. Any IT savings on hosting-fees are likely to be wiped out the first time you have to fly the corporate legal-team across the Atlantic . . .
electric utilities offer a parallel,
when they try to optimize the mix of base load and peak load generators, and when they ship juice around the country.
The parallel is that the base load corresponds to the in-house portion, and the peak load to the cloud portion.
Using thetrainline.com to book your ticket
thetrainline.com takes commission and charges horrendous prices for using a credit card. Just had a look - an advance ticket worth £7.25 (on the day price is £12) came to £11.75! Had I gone to the station in advance instead, I'd have only paid £7.25.
(I recommend http://www.eastcoast.co.uk - you can book any train ticket with them for no commission. Decent wobsite, too)
"The logic is as follows. Imagine you have two choices:"
What was the second choice? Or do you mean a choice of two things? Or there are two options?
"...the cloud provider charges for the shaded area only,"
This isn't really strictly true, though is it? Amazon do not charge you based on the compute-cycles that you use. They charge you based on the number of instances you ask for.
For massively-scaled applications, which are integrated with the EC2 tightly enough to provision and release instances depending upon demand in real-time, one might be able to realise a concept a bit closer to 'pay for what you use'. However, in order to get the good pricing, you must predict and reserve the number of instances you require, which detracts from this dynamism.
There are undoubtedly widely varying different types of workloads living in Amazon's cloud. For some, it will be possible and appropriate to scale on demand. For others, it will be necessary to reserve a baseline of instances. There will always be a trade-off between the better price on a reserved instance vs. the chance of under-utilisation.
For many workloads which serve interactive business users' needs, though, particularly at the small-to-mid-scale, there will be a fairly fixed number of instances necessary to provide a particular service. It might be possible to allow for known peaks in demand at certain times, e.g. log-in rush, but there are workloads that really don't lend themselves well to dynamic scaling. It's important to point out that 99.9% of businesses in the UK are SMEs, and their adoption of cloud will be the benchmark by which me measure how mainstream the technology is becoming.
For a cloud offering to be truly "elastic" the user would only pay spot prices for the cycles/memory that they use at any given instant. These prices would probably vary over time as global demand changes. Of course there are a number of challenges to doing such a thing, which is why none of the major players have managed to offer it as yet.
Cheap at any price
Nice article, detailed, seems biased.
In other markets pay as you go has become pay more for the same as you had before.
Look at cell services esp. data and internet services.
- Updated Microsoft Azure goes TITSUP (Total Inability To Support Usual Performance)
- Review Apple takes blade to 13-inch MacBook Pro with Retina display
- Munich considers dumping Linux for ... GULP ... Windows!
- Game Theory The agony and ecstasy of SteamOS: WHERE ARE MY GAMES?
- Microsoft and HTC are M8s again: New One mobe sports WinPhone