A European Union directive on web cookies that comes into force next month was today endorsed by the UK government, with some caveats attached. Communications minister Ed Vaizey said the UK.gov had no plans to "gold-plate" the EU regulations by bringing in additional measures. However, the Department for Culture, Media and …
this can only end well
Would you like this website to work?
Strangely enough, sites that are well-programmed (oh I don't know - like The Register perhaps?) work perfectly well without cookies. And ask *explicitly* if you want to you use the facility of cookies to make your visit more convenient.
So how soon will we get the advertisers weaseling out of "do not track" settings in headings by saying they only apply to cookies and not to gifs/falsh-cookies/dom-storage/technology-X, so it's fine to track people...?
IAB is trying to get it the wrong way round
The ads should appear with an icon you can click if you DO want to be tracked, not the other way round.
Nice try tough.
I love the way the government is trying to act all surprised as if the EU has dumped this on them, ignoring the fact that they've been involved in it from the beginning, again nice try!
Awful damned tired...
...of legislation fagainst Corporations being watered down to the point of being pointless and legislation against consumers being strengthened.
Crunch is Coming
The IAB solution is only a tiny part of the story - and as pointed out - the wrong way round.
Browsers themselves will never be the right vehicles to control your data at a granular level - or according to local/regional regulation.
An alternative is needed that enables consumers to take control over their web experience and data privacy, and give an opportunity to build trust with brands/networks that they are prepared to share their data with.
That solution will be coming soon.
The title is required, and must contain letters and/or digits
Under the European Privacy and Electronic Communications directive, UK-based businesses and other organisations running websites that track their users' cookies will be required by law to obtain "explicit consent" from visitors to their sites.
When they say UK based does that mean bricks and mortar?
Shouldn't that be European based since its a European directive?
How will "explicit consent" work?
Put a cookie on to say you DO NOT want to be tracked?
Isnt this a form of tracking anyway?
And if you clear your cookies, are you asked again?
Or put a cookie on to say you DO want to be tracked.
Why get het up about it?
If people advertise at me I'm less likely to buy their products and services.
Btw I have got a dirty great cookie from Reghardware.
The children, hello
Where CEOP with there per standard "Think of the childeren", just when you need this joke outfit.
- Pics Whisper tracks its users. So we tracked down its LA office. This is what happened next
- +Comment Trips to Mars may be OFF: The SUN has changed in a way we've NEVER SEEN
- OnePlus One cut-price Android phone on sale to all... for 1 HOUR
- MARS NEEDS WOMEN, claims NASA pseudo 'naut: They eat less
- UNIX greybeards threaten Debian fork over systemd plan