If you don't want your own Watson question-and-answer machine after watching the supercomputer whup the human race on Jeopardy! last week, you must be a lawyer. Only lawyers think they already have all the answers. But if you grew up watching Robbie the Robot in Lost in Space, HAL in 2001: A Space Odyssey, the unnamed but …
Sounds nice, but
I think I will stick with mine:
(Shameless self-plug alert!) :-P
Wilson didn't need no stinking internet connection!
Paris... for raw computing power?
Could it help answer those unanswerable 'wife' questions such as 'Which pair of shoes looks best with this dress?', 'Have I put on weight?', 'Does my bum look big in this?'
If so, it may just be worth the investment...
"Computer says 'No' ".
Or it just does a runner - not wishing to be caught up in the logic-bomb of those 'innocent little questions'.
"Could it help answer those unanswerable 'wife' questions "
You don't need a computer to answer those questions.
1.Which pair of shoes looks best with this dress?
Does not matter. If she gives you a choice between a & b, and you
pick 'a' she goes with 'b'. If you pick 'b' she goes with 'a'.
2.&3. Say 'no', unless you're an idiot.
You only need all that hardware if you're expecting Jeopardy! appropriate response times. I don't care if it's a bit slow.
Hell, you don't even need all the storage, most of the data came from the web - just reference it as you need it.
All that I can get mine to say is
"Hi, this is Eddie, your shiptoard computer!"
I asked it for a cup of tea.
Robbie was from Forbidden Planet
Robbie the Robot was from Forbidden Planet, not Lost in Space.
According to the highly authoritative Wikipedia, the Lost in Space robot "had no given name". However, Robert Kinoshita designed both robots.
I was going to say the same thing. However, if I remember right, Robbie did make several appearances on the show.
algorithm, make Watson re write GCC to produce faster SIMD output binary's for giggles
"Some Watson algorithms are written in C or C++, particularly where the speed of the processing is important. But Gondek says that most of the hundreds of algorithms that do question analysis, passage scoring, and confidence estimation are written in Java. So maybe you want to use a RHEL-JBoss stack for your Watson."
what! are they serious, no simple assembly SIMD used only crap compiler output, perhaps they should set and teach Watson to parse all the worlds assembly for speed and correct and sane fast output then have it write the compiler code routines in SIMD for a given CPU, now that id like to see.
have people like the x264 assembly guys teach it their not so secret source yasm macro's code too to make it a lot simpler https://github.com/DarkShikari/x264-devel
make Watson analyse and re write GCC to produce faster SIMD output based on this training for giggles and get a better compiler and faster binary as a side effect for all users.
Um, I actually DID grow up watching Robbie the Robot on Lost in Space ...in his guest apperance there. The Robot that was there every week wasn't Robbie from the movie Forbidden Planet, it was a totally new model known as a B-9. As Watson wuld have known....
B9 was Best. Kid's. Friend. Ever. Can you say, "Danger, Will Robinson!" ???
Robbie appeared everywhere
Even making an appearance on Columbo (well, half of him did)
Optimal Classification imitator
Watson's NLP is impressive along with its massive memory and parallel speed but the technology to identify trivia or anything else for that matter has been around for some time.
This is because questions and answers are explicitly linked as dependent and independent variables, which may be dynamically classified to place independent variables in an order which permits rapid identification of the dependent variable.
The idea was developed to identify microbes by Dr. Rypka at Lovelace and has been published online for several years. The engine mathematics and an application example using flags is published online here:
Missing from the list?
You missed Orac, the smartest Christmas-decoration-in-a-fishtank in the universe
Yes, blinky lights are needed
If it doesn't have lots of light blinking - then its not a "supercomputer".
Though I prefer Zen - better interpersonal skills and the way of saying "Confirmed" evokes warm glow of nostalgia.
I must admit I liked Slave.
Particularly when he started getting snotty with Orac towards the end of Season D.
Who will do the talking when she finds out about the credit card?
"Watson, quick, she's just found out, what should we do?"
"Sorry, Dave, I can't answer that. But give me an answer and a category, I'll have a question ready in no time."
Category --In The Shit
Question - Where can i say I spent the money?
Answer -- 'A wank-fest of on-line porn' -- the reply will be, 'No, really where did you spend it?'.
'I thought I was ordering flowers for you, but seem to have screwed up. It must be a computer virus.'
@"$1,152 per hour"
Which is $0.32 per second. But I want more processing power than that. A lot more. So ok how about 1M times as much!. That'll be $320000 per second. (Yes I know, they don't have that much to buy ... shame ... but we can all dream ;)
Anyway back in dream land, $320000 is ... umm.. still a bit pricey. ok I'll have to wait a few years. Unless ... how about we all have a whip round and see if we can buy 1 second?! ... Oh and the first question for our supercomputer isn't 42... It'll be:
"Start the Technological Singularity now please!" :)
Then we can all sit back and watch the fireworks! ... popcorn is extra ;)
No general internet data?
Ah, if only
"Arguably the most influential musician of the 20th Century" Bing! "Watson?" "Justin Bieber"
This whole test is unfair because...
...the humans only used 20W per brain, which they themselves carried into the TV studio. When IBM can make a portable 20W machine that can win, and can also soak its processor with a bottle of victory champagne, I'll be impressed.
I would be very impressed if they could beat the human brain with a machine that needed more than 20GW of power!. After that goal, its simply a case of finding ways to optimise and miniaturise the design. (My point is, power usage is far less impressive than actually achieving the goal of beyond human levels of intelligence).
And using Java there is no way it will be small, optimised and little power.
Why does anybody even care about this?
I have been able to Google the answer to any trivia question in a matter of seconds for more than a decade.
What is the point of building a computer system to answer trivia questions in a particular format and who even cares? And why does it require so damn much compute power anyway?
Seriously, this whole Watson thing has been a confusing non-event for me.
Watson is not Google
Google can retrieve documents containing the terms in the query--it does not give you an answer, but rather some suggestions of documents where the answer might be found. Keep in mind that IR algorithms generally just assume a unigram model for speed.
Watson, on the other hand, does NLP--something that no IR system does. It analyzes the clue and provides a concise answer to the question (or rather question to the answer). Practically speaking, this could be really useful in the legal profession, as lawyers have to look through lots of long documents to find the information they're looking for (though maybe they don't care since they're billing by the hour). This could be useful in medicine, as well, where the system could help diagnose a disease (a manifestation of Dr. House in computer form, for those familiar with the show).
This kind of high-speed, high precision expert sytem sounds much like the McKenzie's Friend legal software used as a minor plot device in Ken MacLeod's "The Stone Canal". Although the McKenzie advised in realtime during the case, rather than being used to help build arguments and find precedents beforehand.
Still, it would be very interesting to see where this sort of technology goes.
Yes, of course I realize that Google can not literally play Jeopardy. My point is that by entering some keywords and doing 2 seconds of scanning through search result excerpts I can achieve the same result. So, great, IBM has managed to build a supercomputer that saves me those 2 seconds. And I'm supposed to be amazed?
I question the usefulness of the NLP they're doing. I doubt it has the linguistic precision required to render useful legal information (any more so than a search engine), and as for medical diagnoses, those are better left to expert systems that ask series of diagnostic questions. NLP doesn't enter that equation.
I think a lot of people are over estimating Watson's abilities
It is only able to provide answers to questions when the answer is
1 - Simple
2 - Already known
so it looks like borrowing the money to buy a computer then asking the computer to pay for itself and then take over the world is still not an option.
A little birdie told me it was 10GigE using Juniper switches
lost but not forgotten
What about Dr. Theopolis? Surely it is now time to recognize the writers of the great 70's sci-fi extravaganza "Buck Rogers in the 25th Century" for the visionaries they were!
How to build a super computer
So to summerize this article, buy lots of rack-mounted servers, and install Linux and Appache, Wow. And here I thought the relevant problem was the AI software.
- Product Round-up Smartwatch face off: Pebble, MetaWatch and new hi-tech timepieces
- Geek's Guide to Britain BT Tower is just a relic? Wrong: It relays 18,000hrs of telly daily
- Geek's Guide to Britain The bunker at the end of the world - in Essex
- Review: Sony Xperia SP
- Dell's PC-on-a-stick landing in July: report