Microsoft boss Steve Ballmer is reportedly planning to bring in more senior product execs in a management reshuffle at Redmond. According to Bloomberg Businessweek, which cites two people familiar with the situation, Ballmer could announce the team changes in the next few weeks. In recent months, many top name execs have walked …
Ballmer is next in line to be fired
This is Ballmer[s last hurrah, before he too goes to the chopping block, due to the failure of Windows Phone 7/
That'll be 3 mobile failures: Windows Mobile, Kin, and Windows Phone 7. Three strikes and you're out.
From what I hear...
Windows Phone 7 is liked by quite a few people. I went Android though because for me WP7 is too early after release for me to spend my money on, and could go either way.
But you have to love people announcing failures before they occur because they think it gives them street cred or something to dis the supposed bad Microsoft.
How is Windows Mobile a failure?
It's sold more copies than iOS. Are you one of those IT specialists with a cork on the end of your fork?
Erm "Get The Facts"
Those are "sold" to carriers - not ones that were activated which MS is staying very tight lipped about.
Please engage brain before hitting the keyboard.
It's a failure in that it is too late to the market. Microsoft need to have world beating product to make any impact on the market at this stage. It has promise but it's a few years behind the competition.
It took Microsoft three years to produce a modern replacement for Windows Mobile when it could have taken just one year.
They wasted time producing small tweaks to Windows Mobile 6.x and wasted time on the Kin. Two products nobody wanted.
Ultimately it shows poor leadership.
It does give you 'street cred'...
The Corporate Way
When things are going badly, the solution is always to increase the number of managers and executives. What a load of crap ... MS is truly a shining example of the Peter Principle with bottlenecks always forming at the top.
The guy at the top is a complete idoit. There's where the change is needed most.
I think it's going a bit far to call him an idiot. He's a numbers droid, all he is interested in is if the money is rolling in, who cares how they achieve that.
Bill Gates was a geek, he cared about products, computers and software. Which is probably why there appeared to be a bit more innovation and leadership back then. Ballmer just reacts to the competition and does what they do as there's a few bucks in it.
He's not in the correct role, he should be their chief financial guy (CFO). They need someone like Jobs or Gates in the CEO role again, someone who has some vision.
Well said, Giles
Yes, I'm a Mac user (even a fanboy) but I bemoan that Microsoft have tended towards the reactive these days.
Whilst I accept that on the whole, Apple march to their own drum, I still feel that a little innovative competition helps to spur them on somewhat.
Innovative competition from a visionary company would encourage them greatly and we would all ultimately benefit, despite the inevitable invective from the naysayers.
Here, let me fix that for you.
Bill Gates was a lawyer, he cared about protecting the lock-in for DOS/Windows.
I think you could be on to something there considering how much time they spend in court!
I did not know that!?
Steve Jobs was a CEO of Microsoft!?
(sorry... just taking the piss...)
How can MS shuffle its managers, it hasn't got any managers.
Try shuffling the deck Steve, or the chairs, or your ideas - oops, you've run out of them too I guess.
Call Ben Ali, he'll tell you how to step down
- Pic Forget the $2499 5K iMac – today we reveal Apple's most expensive computer to date
- RUMPY PUMPY: Bone says humans BONED Neanderthals 50,000 years B.C.
- Geek's Guide to Britain Kingston's aviation empire: From industry firsts to Airfix heroes
- Analysis Happy 2nd birthday, Windows 8 and Surface: Anatomy of a disaster
- Review Vulture trails claw across Lenovo's touchy N20p Chromebook