Google has released a ninth version of its Chrome browser, rolling in the WebGL standard for 3D hardware acceleration, the new Chrome Web Store, and Chrome Instant, a tool that loads web pages as soon as you start typing into the browser's address bar. But Google doesn't really refer to Chrome 9 as Chrome 9. Now that it's …
Am I getting it wrong or is instant load a security issue ?
let's say I am slowly typing:
and the browser out guesses me & downloads:
wwww.myGoodObsureSiteNOT.com (evil site, but currently more popular than my obscure site by forum poisoning etc).
I hope I misunderstood something here.
Not how it works
Having tested it, the instant URL completion/load doesn't work quite the same as instant search, it appears to only complete the URL you're typing and load a page instantly if you've visited it before.
When you type a URL you do get a list of suggestions, scrolling through them will load those pages instantly.
Something up with the printer
I try and print a page in Chrome and it says "no printer found" despite it working properly in other browsers. And no print preview either. I welcome an update but I wonder why some of the basics are still getting such short shrift.
@ Printer problems
Did you file a bug? what was the response? Printing works in the majority of Chrome installs, so your experiences will be useful to the chrome team
If you go to about:flags, there's an experimental print preview that may be useful.
Maybe they want you to wait until
Google Cloud Print is ready to go... :P
Finally got it working
After a reboot it is working. No other app was having a problem seeing the printers, Chrome point blank failed to acknowledge there were any at all. Maybe it's something to do with the upgrade process or W7 but a reboot appears to have corrected it.
re: about: flags
Oh thank you very much. I was wondering if there was anything remotely similar to about:config on the 'fox. Plus the lack of print preview still bugs me, since some sites (specially online banking) give you no choice of priting or generating PDFs of transactions made.
You know, if your banking account gets borked, you can prove some operation was made... like paying your 'leccy bill and your power gets cut (is that my UPS beeping?)... because if it is written in paper, it must be true.
It appears to be this problem - http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=20135
Chrome is the man!
Chrome is pretty damm good.
The only thing missing is print preview.
Silverlight would be good as well.
As noted above, there is a "beta" print preview option available by entering "about:flags" in to your address bar. Also Silverlight is definitely available for Chrome with native support. I use it to stream Netflix every day.
Try making sure that your default windows printer is a local one, and not a network printer.
I had this issue on chrome builds going back to 6.x
In other news, have they broken H264 on this version? If so I'm not upgrading.
just got the update works a charm now seems to run alot faster nice one google keep it up ive been with chrome for a few months and im perfectly happy with it. much better than firefox or ie put together
Annoyance is right
I hate the new app store. Saw it in Chromium 8 (the open-source version of Chrome) when I went looking for AdBlock. Screw that. Back to Firefox.
Anyone know if there's an option to disable Instant Search from the address bar... or do you need an app for that?
Preferences > uncheck: Enable Instant faster searching.
Luckily, off by default
Instant is off by default, and thank $DEITY it is, because it's downright broken IMO.. it literally tries to load every character you type.. so if you want www.mysite.com
www -> loads google (chrome has always done this for me)
www.m -> error page saying 'www.m does not exist'
www.my -> error page saying 'www.my does not exist'
www.mysite.co -> error page saying 'www.mysite.co does not exist'
www.mysite.com -> page appears
Luckily I'm not in the US so none of the 'fun' of yet-another-appstore.
And as usual
There's No AD Block, No Script, or Flashblock. 3 of my essentials for browsing oh yes and any thing to keep google out as much as possible.
No thanx I'll stick to FF thank you
2 out of 3 ain't bad
I've got Adblock and Flashblock on my Chrome install - they're quite easy to find...
Where did you get your information?
Upon automatically upgrading to Chrome v9 all of my extensions continued to operate perfectly:
AdBlock - Version: 2.2.29
FlashBlock - Version: 0.9.31
NotScripts - Version: 0.9.6
Keep My Opt-Outs - Version: 1.0.10
They're in the Chrome extensions browser :/
Still No Color Management
Firefox does color management. IE9 does color management. When will Chrome get it done? If you use a wide gamut color monitor, as many photographers do, Chrome gets the colors wrong. Can't use it for critical image evaluation.
Why are you using a *browser* for critical image evaluation, and not a package designed for the task (rather than, you know, a *browser*?)
Maybe he / she is previewing images on stock photo sites before buying?
As someone who sells photos I find it a bit annoying that potential buyers might discard my images because the colours are rendered wrong when they are viewing them.
Yes, I'm afraid you have misunderstood something. As the article says "sites you frequently visit", with the emphasis on the "you". Much like the auto-completion pretty much every browser has for URIs.
HTH, HAND, etc.
Has Google figured out how to offer the option of a persistent bookmark sidebar/pane in Chrome yet? Until they do... fail.
Will keep an eye on it
It will never be my main browser until it gets Flashblock or equivalent. I don't see that coming soon.
Xmarks would be nice too.
// It will never be my main browser until it gets Flashblock or equivalent. I don't see that coming soon.
You mean like this:
Have you even looked at the extension gallery?
@Will keep an eye on it
So it's your main browser then? Because it's had both of these for ages.
My favourite browser, but not perfect.
Chrome is my favourite browser and I've tried all the big ones, Firefox, Safari & Opera.
It's a bit disappointing that rotated images still have jagged edges, or that after the IE Test drive site having the flickr post card demo for so many months...
Chrome still does a bad job of rendering it. (It's standards compliant, Firefox does it fine, just Chrome making a hash of it)
I'll be watching IE9 and Chrome with great interest.
That flickr demo looks fine
Not sure what you think is so bad about it.. Works fine here. Maybe your chrome is out of date?
Not noticed these flaws then?
1) The inset image on a rotated element has jagged edges. Anti aliasing has failed to occur. This works properly in Firefox 3.6, IE9 PP7, Safari 5 and Opera 11 (all tested on Windows). This affects the latest Chrome 11 canary build as of writing. (Chromium Issue 36,902)
2) The inset image (when hovered) despite having a high resolution is blurry (it looks like the image was scaled down for main display, then the scaled down image scaled up for the CSS transform, instead of rescaling from source). This has been fixed in Chrome 10 I think, definitely by 11. This works properly in Firefox 3.6, IE9 PP7, Safari 5 and Opera 11 (all tested on Windows).
3) The z-ordering is wrong. If you make a few flickr postcards pop up and then go back, things overlap where they should not. This works properly in Firefox 3.6, IE9 PP7 and Opera 11 (all tested on Windows). Safari 5 is a lot better but not perfect (some small text has incorrect z-order but rest is fine). I think it is a web kit issue here.
I even tested the Ubuntu version of Chrome and it made the same mistakes. I must stress I do love Chrome, I pay particular attention to these issues hoping every time canary gets updated that the rendering issues have been resolved.
All I can say is it's a good job I am not employing you to do website testing :P
"Printing works in the majority of Chrome installs"
They're going to have to do better than that if they expect anyone to actually use it.
re: "Printing works in the majority of Chrome installs" #2
Oh, so I'm not in the majority, because the print preview is still a no-go. I tried to preview yours truly El Reg forum page, and... it shows a lateral tab with printing settings, but in the main window... a whole lot of nothing is visible.
Curiously it showed the word MAIN greyed out, as if it was "behind" the page.
BTW, now that Google can handle PDFs natively, (or appear to do so) what about using that capability to advantage on print previews? No wonder it is in ALPHA stage, and it could "blow in my face".
I'll get back when they fix it. And where the hell is my coat?
PS. Anyone even mentioning IE tabs for Chrome as viable will be downvoted.
Chrome is awesome
I love Chrome and the new webapp store is wonderful.
I suggest giving it a try. As for people who moan about the functionailty etc... simple solution.
Don't use it stick with your IE and FF if that is what makes you happy.
Installation still broken?
I presume the installer is still incapable of working if you're behind a proxy. When I've tried to install it on a work machine, the little installer would immediately die because it was incapable of navigating a proxy server (presumably to keep the installer very small). The only option has been to try to find the download that the installer downloads and bring it down manually. A task that google appeared to definitely discourage.
A lot of work and enough to make me think that it isn't a good fit in a business environment.
Then again, I gave up trying back at about version 3 or so.
Google didn't discourage it very well...
You can download it using this URL
Just replace the numbers with the figures from the last two sequenced-based identifiers (e.g. for the latest release, use 597.84 taken from 9.0.597.84)
Why don't you just use the MSI download from http://www.google.com/apps/intl/en/business/chromebrowser.html then? That's a much better option for a corporate environment.
I don't hear any complaints about Linux 3D drivers......
So what's going on? I thought it was the WebGL stuff causing FireFox4 issues on Linux. Does Chrome 9 manage WebGL on Linux without a problem? Maybe Firefox could copy the Chrome code. ;-)
Linux 3D drivers
You're right, Joe. The MESA drivers stink. Try running valgrind on an OpenGL program, and you'll see all kinds of pointer glitches in the GL/MESA libraries (which are the user-side parts of the drivers)... especially in ATI drivers. I finally gave up on that one and bought on NVidia card so I can use their proprietary driver. I've had better luck with Intel drivers but their GPUs are pretty basic.
There's one hopeful possibility -- OpenGL ES 2.0 (= WebGL) drivers should be easier to develop than full-scale OpenGL. I suspect that application developers would happily give up the latter if there were solid drivers for the former. I certainly would.
- Twitter: La la la, we have not heard of any NUDE JLaw, Upton SELFIES
- China: You, Microsoft. Office-Windows 'compatibility'. You have 20 days to explain
- Apple to devs: NO slurping users' HEALTH for sale to Dark Powers
- Is that a 64-bit ARM Warrior in your pocket? No, it's MIPS64
- Apple 'fesses up: Rejected from the App Store, dev? THIS is why