The endgame in the long-running battle over who is to control the internet may be upon us, with the appointment of a little-reported but highly significant new UN committee to look into initiatives for policing the internet. This follows the decision at the UN Commission on Science and Technology for Development (CSTD) 2010-2011 …
Carpe status quo
The current system is working fine.
As it is now, it is impossible for any government entity to waltz in and shut down websites, DNS, access to payment services, or take away domain names without reasonable due process.
This Bud's for Vint Cerf.
The end game for THIS internet maybe.
Will someone please explain to these idiots how the internet works.
Once they have 'control' of the popular, mainstream internet - most of us will just move to another net within the net...
You can't stop the signal.
There are already several Wifi Meshnets where I live. Some folk are even working on an information-scattering approach. Establishing multiple meshnets at different frequencies, and then requiring an "intelligent" network stack behind it. Packet 1 goes on to meshnet 1, packet 2 goes onto meshnet 2, etc.
It's all early days for this stuff, but should the excrement hit the rotating air circulation device, I fully expect interconnected meshnets to spring up like weeds to replace the now-defunct government controlled, monitored and censored internet.
Vested Intrests ?
Chief Internet Evangelist Vint Cerf stated: "The beauty of the Internet is that it’s not controlled by any one group. Its governance is bottoms-up [sic] — with academics, non-profits, companies and governments all working to improve this technological wonder of the modern world.
"This model has not only made the Internet very open - a testbed for innovation by anyone, anywhere - it's also prevented vested interests from taking control.
Pooh, I say.
Governance of what, by whom ? The identity of the "vested interests" who want control is clear from the list. Vint does not like to pay taxes; we get it. Neither does Google, and therein lies the conflict. Shame on the Reg for promoting anarchy in the guise of freedom.
Re: Vested Intrests ?
Yeah, yeah, shame on the Reg. SHAME.
Er, we quoted. We didn't endorse. Small difference. But still! SHAME! I love a good SHAME.
"Shame on the Reg for promoting anarchy in the guise of freedom."
Well, they weren't, and in any case, having civil society represented in a talking shop like the IGF is hardly anarchy; it's an essential check-and-balance on the desires of totalitarian governments.
Er, shame on the Reg for announcing the petition after its target date for signatures...
The current bottoms-up, open approach
He's been visiting Goatse.cx
Argh. Cerf, you've poisoned my mind.
Bottoms-up is best
Now that's a search term I'm NOT going to be putting into Google...
Thumb... Oh it's that obvious... !
What an awful htought
The U.N. couldn't find its way to a public toilet.
oh, you see its worth now?
I first started using the internet back in 1994. As we should all know, it was a world with very little content. It has now grown into what we have today.
So only now, when governemnts and commerce rely on it, is its freedom being threatened.
Typical, get the masses involved and the whole thing must change for the few.
- Geek's Guide to Britain Kingston's aviation empire: From industry firsts to Airfix heroes
- Analysis Happy 2nd birthday, Windows 8 and Surface: Anatomy of a disaster
- Review Vulture trails claw across Lenovo's touchy N20p Chromebook
- Adobe spies on readers: EVERY DRM page turn leaked to base over SSL
- Analysis The future health of the internet comes down to ONE simple question…