Feeds

back to article A question of performance

Software as a service (SaaS) promises a lot but many are still nervous about relying on it for business use. The concerns we hear most centre on security, privacy and operational risk. The first two are the most important and we will be covering these later in our workshop. In the meantime, we will start by considering …

COMMENTS

This topic is closed for new posts.
Silver badge

::rolls eyes::

"A well-designed hosted service, on the other hand, is much more likely to have had business-class operational capability baked into it from the start: resilience and recovery measures as well as resources, skills and processes."

My in-house stuff has better operational capability (having one or more fewer network links between user & data than *aas stuff), better resilience (I mandate redundancy where needed), and better recovery (I grok the ins & outs of backup better than most).

But then, *aas isn't really geared toward folks who have the skills to deploy resources in order to smoothly & efficiently roll out processes, now is it? Rather, it's geared toward marketards who have their eyes more focused on the bottom line than the overall usability of the system ...

2
0
Thumb Up

Spot on

I couldn't agree more! nothing beats designed right custom fit scalable business solutions. Like businesses learnt with oursourced data centers they will learn once again with Saas.

0
0
Thumb Down

This infomercial

Was sponsored by someone who would like your money

1
0

Couldn't have sadi it better myself

as above

0
0
Boffin

SaaS vs In-House

There are merits of both SaaS and In-House, but some blatent things are obvious, but unaddressed:

1) Network connectivity. Sure, a SaaS datacenter has DS3, or OC12+ lines and the like, but what about YOUR business? Business-class cable modem? DSL perhaps? Splurge for a T1? This is what /most/ small-to-mid-sized businesses use (they're the most likely to use SaaS anyway, right?). Outages on these forms of connections happen more frequently than for SaaS datacenters. Have hosted email? Probably best. Hosted business-critical apps? Definately not. Imagine not being able to schedule or lookup appointments for the Mac Genius bar for even 2 hours. Imagine if your entire billing software is "in the cloud" and you lose your internet connection for half a business day?

2) Backups. I admit I haven't had the need to request a backup from a SaaS service, but I doubt they use CDP (continuous data protection [to steal a Symantec buzzword]). What if you needed to review files that were deleted over a month ago? Better yet, what about that file you typed up 3 days ago, lived for 6 hours, and was printed & deleted before end-of-day? Will they troll your (hopefully existant) backups and recover that singular document for you? My current in-house backup strategy can, and fairly easily too. Since *most* data recovery is needed within 24 hours, and all the rest but a few percent within 7 days, having a backup system you KNOW can fulfill your needs in that regard is crucial.

3) Privacy. Data breaches don't happen much, but Silverpop is a good example of why you may not want to just have your data out there. A small/mid biz is a lot harder to hack if no one knows your IP. (hosted websites are another good SaaS use, mostly)

4) SaaS is great if you don't have a knowledgable IT-staffer, which is the case of many small/mid biz (sadly), since it will provide a company with many assurances that you won't get by electing the one guy in the office that owns TWO computers as the tech go-to guy.

SaaS and the Cloud are great, but they're just buzzwords for client/server networking, just on the internet instead of the server closet.

0
0
This topic is closed for new posts.