Railway union boss Bob Crow reckons putting a one-penny tax on text messaging would wipe out half the UK's deficit, demonstrating a rather optimistic approach to financial planning. The comment comes in an interview with The Guardian, and is followed by the assertion that if in charge, the good Mr Crow would "squeeze the rich ' …
...so better let's make it £1 per text - and an extra surcharge on voice of £5 per call if the caller speaks loudly or shouts, double if they're on a train or in a similar crowded place, £50 if the phone rings while in a theatre/cinema/library.
One penny. Two pence.
Tuppence old hat now is it?
Twopence is for seeds
Feed the birds... Twopence a bag...
He is mistaking communications with the railways. Communications across most of the country do not follow the rule of "On First Capital Connect nobody will hear you scream".
It is the railways where you can charge the customers anything they like and then some and then pack them like a sardine in a can and then ask them if they like it.
Communications are not exactly the same... Customers will promptly alter their means of communications to avoid costs and/or congestion. If you charge them for SMS they will move to IM, if you find a way to charge them for IM they will move to mail and so on as the mobile operators discovered once they started offering meaningful data tariffs. If you stack messages in a "carriage" for 1h in a siding for later processing they will simply switch to something else.
All the penny coins in my pocket have "ONE PENNY" stamped thereon.
You mean "one penny piece" I think.
"One pence piece" doesn't make sense.
"one penny" is what it says
"Tuppence old hat now is it?"
I'd have said so, yes.
"Tuppence", "thruppence" and the like I only ever recall being used by my parents' generation to refer to old pre-decimal money (which even though I was only born five years after decimalisation, was totally alien to me, some weird and confusing relic of the past with esoteric coins, endless shillings, guineas, farthings and the like).
I can't recall it ever being used to refer to modern money.
Another great idea brought to you by...
... the moron who thinks that striking every six months is a good way to drum up support for your cause.
"Here's a good one: How about a penny extra tax on travel tickets. Oh crap, they are expensive already.
Ok. Er lottery tickets. Nope.
Er how about loafs of bread. Great! Everyone needs bread.... and food. Sod it if we taxed food the deficit could be wiped out before christmas."
And that is how Bob Crow came to be lynched by a baying mob your honour....
How about a strike tax
A tenner a day per striker, paid by the union and fifty a day for each picket who is not a union member
I'm use a pre-pay mobile, and I wouldn't mind paying an extra 1p per text, seems like a good idea! I'm not sure how it'd work on contracts though...
it'd probably work
by the operator charging you 1p per text and then passing it onto the government?
Re: it'd probably work
You mean taxes go to the government!?
o crap, well this idea isnt gud at all then!
Nothing to see here, move along
Was it really necessary to demonstrate that unionists (and socialists or communists) do not have the slightest grasp of how economics work?
"Do we have a problem with excess spending? Just raise taxes, that will do." The problem with these people is, they collect and spend tax revenue as if it is not their own money. Oh, bugger!
'Was it really necessary to demonstrate that unionists (and socialists or communists) do not have the slightest grasp of how economics work?'
I think our current situation is largely down to the fact that economists do not have the slightest grasp of how economics work.
The trouble with socialists...
...is that they inevitably run out of other people's money.
"I think our current situation is largely down to the fact that economists do not have the slightest grasp of how economics work."
Nah, it's more a case of the fact that economics, being a discipline not based on any objective measure of reality, doesn't actually work in the first place.
Right, I'm off to do all my Xmas shopping down the 'ideal market'...
I'm gettijng that put on a t-shirt.
Correct me if I'm wrong but as far as I know the current situation was largely forseeable using well known ecomomics models. Mind you, there's not only one possible outcome although even with modest knowledge of economics it was pretty obvious that we were running into troubles.
Rather than clueless economists the problem was that as long as all profited no one could be bothered to change course.
The trouble with capitalists
As the economic crisis has proven is that economists/cpaitalists can't help but line their own pockets at the expense of the system and it's contributors. They demonstrate an a fearsome addiction to money and attempt to create alternate realities and economic models which almost always eventually collapse or are simply reset and allowed to collapse again once the current disaster is a long distant memory.
' They demonstrate an a (sic) fearsome addiction to money and attempt to create alternate realities and economic models which almost always eventually collapse or are simply reset and allowed to collapse again once the current disaster is a long distant memory...'
Oddly enough, that pretty much sums up the last Labour government.
Re: the trouble with capitalists.
Problem is, that would be way tl;dr for a T shirt.
That's you, isn't it Maggie? Clever using the name Ted...great double-bluff.
Ted Treen: "The trouble with socialists...is that they inevitably run out of other people's money."
Maggie Thatcher: "The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money. "
I wonder if Maggie was thinking of a particular politician when she said: "Being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are, you aren't."
Send me one
(pint OR a T-shirt) & I won't ask for royalties.
Boom and bust vs No growth
The fact is that, averaged over time, boom and bust is still better than the no growth situation that extreme socialism ends up giving you. Look at East vs West Germany as a fantastic example. East Germany hardly grew at all (in GDP terms) in the time between WW2 and the reunification; whereas West Germany grew many times over, despite going through a number of recessions.
Recessions are painful and some people are hurt disproportionately large amounts, but capitalism even with its problems is significantly better than any alternatives people have yet come up with.
Remember also that the reason this time was so painful was because the bubble was ready to burst way back in 2002, but governments spent their way through the bubble in Keynesian terms, allowing it to grow even bigger before it actually burst. If we had taken our medicine in 2002 rather than idiots like Brown trying to spend our way through a recession in the belief that they had done away with boom and bust, we would have got rid of the debt bubble far earlier and far less painfully.
@ Scott 19
Put me down for 10 of those please. While we are at it could you add:
Gordon & Alistair, the men who bankrupted Britain.
Gordon Brown, Arbitrary private pension destroyer.
Gordon Brown, Gold sell off Swindler.
Jesus, do any labour voters have any marbles.......................?
Personally, I think all labour politicians should all be put up against a wall and shot for crimes against the state. All except mandy - I want to bludgeon him to death with an extremely blunt spoon. Even that is too good for him.
Most gubberments (& economists) follow keynesian economics, which is known to be terribly flawed - they have always known it will go bang (or tits up, whatever you prefer) one day. Unfortunately that day is extremely close now.
Don't think anybody can predict what will happen, other than to say it is not going to be pretty. The yanks are mainly to blame for completely killing off the gold standard when they discovered they could not pay for the Vietnam war. A lot of other countries followed suit - since then its simply spiralled our of control. The Dollar is more than likely dead, as is the pound and the Euro.
Meantime China and India have been buying up all the physical gold and silver they can as they know the paper markets that represent the metals have at least 10 times more paper than the actuals. They also know that the gov't bonds and gilts of most countries in the west are not worth the paper they are printed on.
Europe meanwhile (which is perhaps the greatest abomination of all) allows corrupt and idiotic countries/governments like Greece to join where you could retire at 46 as well economically inferior countries from eastern Europe - a recipe for economic disaster given the UK's 'socialist' preoccupation.
Wow - how did an order for T shirts turn into that........ Guess I'm just really pissed having elected officials who are at best incompetent, secretive and self perpetuating.
Would have to agree.
We all quite happily benefited under new labour (myself included) turning a blind eye on the fact that some point something had to give. That point is now.
We all quite happily benefited under new labour...
Some of us were repeatedly pointing out the unsustainable rise in public spending and the government's casual disregard of the credit bubble.
It's a quote from the great lady herself. Margaret Thatcher
Oh goodie, a labour / tory argument.... I'll just chime in with my tuppeny worth
Labour may have their faults (and I'd be the first in line to see Tony hanged for war crimes and Gordon locked up for massive economic fraud) but if you think the Tories are here to benefit anyone posting on these forms you're suffering from clinical-grade delusions. If they could figure out a way to reintroduce a serf class for their Eton chums we'd all find ourselves working for gruel and shelter tomorrow.
Nothing to do with Keynes
You must be thinking about using public spending to stimulate growth.
Keynesian theory is quite clear about how increased public spending is supported - taxation, bonds etc and recognises that there will inevitably be a rebalancing - this is because Keynes knew how to do sums.
All that was stimulated during the last decade was unsupported credit to all and sundry - not just governments. The failure point when the cost of default is greater than the value of new credit can be worked out with a pencil and a very small peice of paper.
Just a thought but maybe being able to do sums should be a requirement for bankers (and for Treasury ministers).
Vodaphone won't even pay the tax bill they have now. So how do our tax master plan to get Vodaphone and their like to pay more.
Shame on Vodaphone, BHS and all those other Tax avoiding scum.
Says the contractor who boasted about 'avoiding' taxes pre-ir35....
And do you think it is wrong?
I think it is not.
UK is one of those countries where it is considered unnatural for a technical manager to be paid less than some of their qualified staff. Prior to ir35, this "unnatural" situation was naturally resolved by the most qualified going on a contract. It is one of those UK specific outright sillies, but nobody found it "unnatural" to pay a _HIGHER_ rate to a contractor than the manager was getting while the same situation for permies was considered untolerable.
IR35 did very little in terms of getting tax revenue and I am inclined to think that this was the intention of its "sponsors" like Capita in the first place. It gave all highly qualified technical staff earning more than the GMs a choice - either lobotomise themselves into a managerial function or take a pay cut.
7 years ago UK was a country plenty of places where you could get four people to write you a whole embedded system or a single person to write you a whole networking stack in a couple of months before moving off to their next contract. There were FTSE500 companies whose existence and business model was based on that. UK had a competitive industry on the global scale.
7 years later there is nothing left from this. The few remaining manage 60 wannabies in a warmer climate who fail to deliver where two British contractors delivered with ease 7 years ago.
That is the real damage from IR35. It made the entire UK IT and Telecoms industry anticompetitive in the long term. From an overall cost vs benefits to the economy point of view I'd rather have people avoiding taxes till this day but still have an innovative and competitive industry as it creates a whole chain of jobs each and every one of which is taxed.
a tax on every time a company takes the head of HMRC out to dinner.
I reckon £6b sounds about right.
And shame on HMG
for letting them get away with it and landing me with the bill!
@And do you think it is wrong?
Of course not,
What is "wrong" is hypocrites who moan about other people managing their taxes efficiently whilst doing the exact same thing themselves, like the Donkey above.
Managing taxes efficently / Avoiding taxes
If VodaPhone were managing their taxes efficiently then I can't see why the HRMC had a claim for 12bn. Avoiding Tax and managing tax efficiently..... guess it depends on which side of the fence you are sitting on.
I take it you work Cadbury. Another great British institution managing their tax efficiently by moving to Switzerland.
What's your status anonymous coward?
Why dont we simply NOT pay interest on the deficit!
you're a troll, right?
> Why dont we simply NOT pay interest on the deficit!
Because we're relying on people lending the government very many billions of pounds just to keep paying the biils, and if you stop paying interest who exactly would be willing to lend the goverment their money?
Same reason you don't default on your credit card bill.
Because that would be classed as a default, which would mean we could not borrow more or it would be extremely expensive, at the same time anyone who holds guilts would see their holdings drop hugely in value. (Not just banks who would suffer, but it would devastate our pensions.) It would also massively devalue the pound causing huge inflation causing all sorts of social chaos.
Wait, is 'ooFie' Bob Crows Reg screen name??
they send the heavies around and we cant change address fast enuff? Or might they taaaaaaaaake it away from me? (after of course I have maxed out)
I'm not sure if you meant that as a facetious comment. However, it appears that there are many that don't understand, so in just in case...
The government raises money through taxation, and then spends money on roads, rail, armed forces, schools, health. If they spend more than they raise, this is called a "deficit". The "national debt" is effectively all of the deficits that have been accrued by various governments over the years. (The amount of that is open to interpretation, but is well over £1 trillion and still climbing)
Like any other person or organisation, if you spend more than you receive in income, you have to draw on existing assets, or borrow the money. You borrow money from other people and in return, you pay them for their generosity by giving them a bit more money than you borrowed. This is called "interest".
If you decide that you don't want to pay interest, then you are going to find it difficult to get anyone to lend you money. And, if you decide not to repay the money that you have borrowed, you are classified as a bad risk and no-one will lend you money except at stupidly high rates of interest which reflects the level of risk that they are taking.
In serious cases, the lender will send the boys around to encourage you to make a payment. Whilst we would not see that at a government level, instead we see other countries refusing to supply us with goods.
Seriously - 2
That is a very good summary of the facts.
The two questions that lead on from this is
1) WTF do we do to pay off national debt - not just cut the annual deficeit.
2) How do we stop the politicos having short term polivy views (lets speand today and let whoever wins the next election pay of it) from over speanding again.
@Tony S - Seriously? First class.
Well Govt should "spends money on roads, rail, armed forces, schools, health " rather than on ideological nonsense and spin-doctors, but other than that First Class.
Now please take a lead pipe and explain it to the HoC and any other politicians you meet.
Well, Maggie DID pay off the national debt, before the morally bankrupt intellectual pygmies (collectively called the Labour party) dragged us right back into the ordure...
It wouldn't work anyway
If texting came to be too expensive, most folk with PAYG smartphones would use their online minutes or (and I assume not just Orange do this) the £1 for a day of internet deals and use email, twitter and Facebook to chat to their friends instead of txting.
As for the rest, how does the extra tax work on my unlimited texts bundle?
- Fee fie Firefox: Mozilla's lawyers probe Dell over browser install charge
- 20 Freescale staff on vanished Malaysia Airlines flight MH370
- Neil Young touts MP3 player that's no Piece of Crap
- Review Distro diaspora: Four flavours of Ubuntu unpacked
- Sysadmins and devs: Do these job descriptions make any sense?