Google has responded to a New York Times story which revealed the search engine was rewarding websites that have dozens of complaints and negative reviews with high rankings. This is because of the way the search engine rates sites according to how many other sites link to them. First the back story: the paper followed the story …
You're kidding me right?
His surname is Borker?
What do you call it when your name reflects what you do?
...that I'll see half a dozen similar posts above mine, but posting just in case. It's called nominative determinism.
... try googling nominative determinism. Best ever example is
Br J Urol. 1977 Apr;49(2):173-6.
The urethral syndrome: experience with the Richardson urethroplasty.
Splatt AJ, Weedon D.
re: You're kidding me right?
"What do you call it when your name reflects what you do?"
Nominative Determinism, according to the Feedback column in New Scientist.
merchants that, in our opinion, provide an extremely poor user experience
Let the Microsoft thumping begin!
Vista, Millenium are the starter for 10
Sue for loss of business?
Do ya think Borker will try and sue Google for loss of business? Now that would be ironic!
How about the merchant face fraud charges and have all his accounts frozen? The guy is not only a crook but is arrogant enough to admit to the media. Oh wait the government is too busy going after Wikileaks to care.
Could be a good move
All that press coverage = extra inbound links
So now Google tells us what is "good" and "bad"...
Honestly, if you base your purchase decision on Google search rankings, you deserve to get fake glasses.
'So now Google tells us what is "good" and "bad"...'
Google is clearly developing a "Santa" algorithm to find out the correct "naughty" and "nice" score for the world's children, this is the just the 1st step toward the total Googlification of Christmas....
Did I correctly read that this woman picked a company purely because they were at the top of Google, without doing any further research?
Maybe I'm too paranoid, but I always go by previous experience, word of mouth, or if I'm really pushed, I read as many reviews as I can from different sites before commiting.
Google is just a starting point, it isn't particularly trustworthy beyond that...
"Did I correctly read that this woman picked a company purely because they were at the top of Google, without doing any further research?"
Yep, customers are idiots. This is pretty much the philosophy used for scammers selling wrist bands that give you super powers and such.
The idiot customers go no further than the primary site that promises the earth, without actually learning everyone else hates their guts for good reason.
A fool and their money are soon parted... As the saying goes.
To be fair....
this is the philosophy used by most/all legitimate businesses too. Banks in the UK for example treat their customers like shit happily taking money from peoples accounts as if it is their own and yet people still have bank accounts and worse still, refuse to switch bank accounts to a less shitty provider. And don't get me started on the big retailers who provide shitty service selling what they have not what you want and STILL people buy from them. I'm looking at you particularly Dixons/DSG/Whatever the hell you are calling yourself at the moment, but pretty much any of the high street names and most of the back street ones behave this way.
When does Google release it's new (beta!) GBB service?
That's Google Business Bureau for all of you who won't see it coming.
WTF is this story about?
Can I get my neighbour removed from the phone directory please? His dog keeps shitting on my lawn.
Google has to be extremely careful, if they start doing that they will be held responsible for everything they list, including all kinds of fraud and bamboozlement. The Recording Ass. of America probably won't have the balls to go for them, but I bet some others will give it a go.
Who's evil ?
Today I have recommendations for "The Register" videos on my YouTube screen. "These recommendations are based on your watch history, shared videos and other channel subscriptions." Got money for this ?
I'm not laughing...
An algorithm that decides if you're 'good or evil' - nah, I can foresee any problems there :/
I'd say he's
Smart for figuring it out, stupid for talking about it.
That's vanity for you.
It wasn't vanity
He's raised "there's no such thing as bad publicity" to an art form. He's reached the peak of his art with the NY Times article.
Who is Russo?
"Rodriguez ordered glasses from the site, which turned out to be fake. When she complained, the site's owner, one Vitaly Borker, was first abusive and then threatening. When the dispute escalated Russo sent Rodriguez pictures of her apartment building and emails saying: "I AM WATCHING YOU"."
So we are told about Rodriguez, we are introduced to Vitaly Borker... and then all of a sudden this "Russo" person is introduced as though we should know who he/she is.
Who is s/he?
They've been a bit quick with the cut&paste
Read the NY Times article. Same person.
...and you did exactly what he wanted:
- you mentioned his website, which is similar to DdeeccoorrMmyyEeyyeess.com
and you mentioned the two keywords he wanted you to mention in conjunction with his website (spacing and dyslexia deliberate) -
D e s i n g e r E y e g a l s s e s
D e s i n g e r E y e w a e r
Not all search engines are Google, so you're still supporting him as described in the article even if Google isn't ranking him as highly any more, which remains to be seen. I'll bet he or his ilk find a new way to game the system very very soon.
Why give the moron the oxygen of publicity?
Re: ...and you did exactly what he wanted:
"Why give the moron the oxygen of publicity?"
I'm not happy with him having the oxygen of oxygen!
// Linda Smith RIP
This guy is the BOFH's eCommerce cousin.
Someone send a link to Mr Travaglia.
"...Google said it had 'developed an algorithmic solution which detects the merchant from the Times article along with hundreds of other merchants that, in our opinion, provide an extremely poor user experience.'"
I suspect this is a guy in a room checking review sites, not some intergalactic mathematical algorithm as Google would have us believe....
> No where they post their negative comments, it helps my return on investment.
I think that was meant to say "Now when they post...."
I'm too lazy to google it..but...
Is there a firefox plugin that modifies google queries to include user specified options and don't require logging in first?