The Fedora Project, the open source community that creates the Linux variant that eventually becomes Red Hat's commercial-grade Enterprise Linux distro, has kicked out the "Laughlin" Fedora 14 release. Jared Smith, who took over as Fedora Project Leader in June, has one notch on his belt now. You can see the release notes for …
"a 400 MHz Pentium Pro with 512 MB of memory and 10 GB of disk is the recommended minimum configuration for a graphical Linux setup. Try that with Windows 7."
It's nice of you to notice it but I'm afraid I'd better admit that it's mostly what we in the business would call 'a raging porky'. :) We're discussing how to update the listed system requirements. The problem is that Linux is so flexible; it certainly is *possible* to set up a working Fedora environment with minimal hardware that won't make you kill yourself of frustration, but it's not really true of the *default* environment.
For Fedora's standard desktop - GNOME 2.32 with various heavy apps like Firefox and OO.o - a more realistic minimum would probably be a P3 with 1GB of RAM (512MB is just about enough to run Firefox *or* OO.o, these days). To run on a slower system with 512MB you'd probably want to be using Xfce or LXDE and some lighter weight applications.
(There's also a few more basic problems with the stated minimums: there's no such thing as a 400MHz Pentium Pro, they topped out around 200MHz, and I'm pretty sure it was more or less impossible to shoehorn 512MB of RAM into one).
"512MB is just about enough to run Firefox *or* OO.o"
Not at all
Firefox is sitting at 335MB here. Put that on top of GNOME (which is about 100MB by itself) and Bob's your uncle.
"Firefox is sitting at 335MB "
105MB + 20 shared here
Total load with KDE + firefox ( 5 tabs) + Thunderbird + Dolphin + Sys Mon and all the services = 430MB
From OpenSUSE 11.3 (current release)
The following requirements should be met to ensure smooth operation of openSUSE 11.3:
* Processor: Intel: Pentium 1-4, Xeon or newer; AMD: Duron, Athlon, Athlon XP, Athlon MP, Athlon 64, Sempron, Opteron or newer
* Main memory: At least 256 MB; 512 MB recommended
* Hard disk: At least 500 MB for minimal system; 2.5 GB recommended for standard system
* Sound and graphics cards: Supports most modern sound and graphics card
Presumably they are wrong too. Firefox is the default browser and OO is included
D programming language
Just what the world needs!
Now if they had ported dtrace I would be very interested in that.
You have SystemTap. Porting dtrace would be the same as porting i.e. smit from AIX.
Minimum vs. reasonable requirements
I cannot test that today, but until six months ago I ran Ubuntu, latest release, on a 512MB machine with a 2GHZ single core/single thread processor.
And I used it for my everyday browsing, mail, a bit of development and video format conversion. True, trying to run more than one Windows VirtualBox instance was an exercise in patience, but other than that the machine was perfectly happy. And I was too.
So maybe a 400MHz CPU is slow, but certainly the amount of memory is not.
“The NetBeans IDE is updated to the 6.9 release, which Fedora says is a significant update”
Surely you could upgrade long before the operating system upgrade. I don't understand the mertis to this claim.
what Fedora needs
is a free LTS release for old fogies like me who are too long in the tooth to upgrade every year.
well, the beauty of linux is the choice. and as soon i configured e16 on ubuntu 10.04, i've decided to stick with it.
however as a long term redhat/fedora user i'm sure that this release will be top notch as always. i'll download and install it on a usb disk the first weekend i get some time to play around.
Fedora isn't really intended to be LTS, it's bleeding edge type stuff. You'd want CentOS or Red Hat.
No support for PowerPC ?
I know but, there're so much ppc Mac awaiting for some buyers. What a waste.
That's a real shame, I've got an old G5 Mac which dual boots Mac OS and Fedora (so that I can run the latest version of MythTV) it looks like I'll have to start seriouly looking to get a new Intel based box. Either that, or actually pay for OSX 10.5, which will run Myth for a little while at least...
why not try debian
there's a lenny version for PowerPC
i installed Debian a long time back on a 486, it wasn't too difficult and aptitude is a breeze once set up.
you could probably run your G5 till the hardware grinds to a halt which hopefully is a long way off.
D Programming Language
At last! The answer to a question proposed decades ago.
BCPL led to the language B, and then eventually to C. The question asked at that time was: "Will the next programming language be called D or P?"
The title is required, and must contain letters and/or digits.
Installed easily enough, a couple of problems but these were easily overcome and I am now working away quite merrily. So far feels good.
As for LTS, as has already been pointed out this isn't really what fedora is about, for that you do need to use another distro or go down the RHEL route.
400Mhz Pentium Pro? That's a heck of an overclock!
Or maybe they meant Pentium II... though even that would be near the end of the range.
As for the RAM, though, it's probably spot on; I've run a modern system with as low as 256 MB of RAM, and while it's crawled, it still managed to work. 512 MB, and it would have been a decent system.
My guess is...
They referred to the gcc ppro target which in effect means any P6 core, from Ppro to PIII and some other chips for laptops that used basically the same core (neutrino was P6 based, if I remember well). Of course, later pentium chips are backward compatible with this P6 core, even if very different internally.
The Ppro was also the 1st chip to handle the extended address scheme (PAE), this maybe explaining that, as I believe Fedora since F11 relies on a PAE-enabled kernel in 32bits mode.
- IT bloke publishes comprehensive maps of CALL CENTRE menu HELL
- Analysis Who is the mystery sixth member of LulzSec?
- Nine-year-old Opportunity Mars rover sets NASA distance record
- Prankster 'Superhero' takes on robot traffic warden AND WINS
- Comment Congress: It's not the Glass that's scary - It's the GOOGLE