Mountain View will keep its Google Wave engine running until at least the end of 2010. The ad broker confirmed on Monday that its unpopular Wave product, which Google ditched in August, would limp on for the next few months. "We're looking at ways to continue and extend Wave technology in other Google products, open sourcing …
Best possible outcome?
So it tanked, but at the very least it was an interesting idea, and I'm sure a few people (somewhere) leapt on board enthusiastically and won't want to see it die. If Google make good and open up everything the more driven of those people need in order to pick up and run with it, then it can survive on life-support and maybe, in time, it'll mature into something more people will get excited about. Not only that, but it'll be out from under Google's "stewardship" which, albeit a massive kneecapping in resource terms, will please the tinfoil-hats.
Didn't really work
As someone who collaborates with people over long distances, I thought this would be perfect for me. But it just seemed a little limp, and I gave up on it after a few minutes, when I couldn't really see what it would actually do that I couldn't already do with Skype, e-mail and Dropbox.
I found Wave useful
Because in one interface it combined wiki editing and a threaded discussion forum + synchronous communication.
The only problem was that there wasn't any way to register a whole university class on it - only a few friends - so there was no way to do a proper test of Wave in the obvious context - a pre-existing group.
I found wave useful too.....well, would have.....
....if it had worked properly and been more flexible. As a unified method of dealing with interactive collaboration it is quite spectacular. Being able to combine different media and to record the development of a wave and replay it has a number of applications for which a solution currently does not exist in the real world.
Imagine a bulletin/message board with waves for threads/topics. Subsequent contributors can add/amend/insert material in the relevant place, without having to quote previous posts and append it at the end. It could be mixed media...and anyone joining the discussion could play the thread to catch up. Of course to be able to do that it needed to be able to be hosted on ones own servers/hosting, to be integrated into a wrapper that is site specific, and to allow a diverse range of enhanced admin options (for example privileges for read/write/edit of existing waves and to be able to control who can publish new waves).
....but now think that you can use the same mechanism for private messages, public messages to people unregistered at the site, you can also use it as a collaboration environment for writing white papers or as a project management tool. Think of it as rtf for the internet age.
Google indicated that this would be possible, and tried to get developers on board to work towards such integration. Why didn't it happen? Well it partly did, it's just that the technology is immature, the feature set outside the google hosted wave servers substandard, and the google hosted waves lacked the community (of either developers or users) to gain momentum.
Wave isn't a fail, though. Get the technology right, integrate it into specific applications, and distribute freely in a truly non-proprietary way, and I still believe it's a game changer.
The question is, who pays?
It's an Apple Newton moment. Absolutely brilliant idea, but fundamentally unusable in its current form. Look forward ten years, and the showcased concepts behind it will be ubiquitous.
we should all do an operation chaos for this wave and all start using it so google has to continue support for it.
later we can all drop it to the curb once google further invests in it.
isn't google wave great? yes it is.
- Nokia: Read our Maps, Samsung – we're HERE for the Gear
- Kaspersky backpedals on 'done nothing wrong, nothing to fear' blather
- Episode 9 BOFH: The current value of our IT ASSets? Minus eleventy-seven...
- Too slow with that iPhone refresh, Apple: Android is GOBBLING up US mobile market
- Analysis Uber, Lyft and cutting corners: The true face of the Sharing Economy