HP pays to end kickback probe. Is this
Sort of kickback squared, perhaps?
HP pays to end kickback probe
HP is taking a two cents per share charge to end a Department of Justice investigation into bribery allegations. The company stressed that it was not admitting any wrongdoing, of course. The DOJ investigation began in 2007 and included Accenture and Sun. It centred on allegations that the three companies improperly charged for …
This topic is closed for new posts.
Er, hey, what?!?
We're going to... er... "pay off" (bribe?) the prosecutors... to... stop investigating us for... er... bribery?
Re: Er, hey, what?!?
Bugger, there goes this year's bonus as well ... (unless you're in management of course)
Signed, overworked HPer.
Of course not!
When the government gets it then it's either taxation or donations depending how rich you are.
I've always wondered how that works...
Err, we might get convicted here...
*Money*
Wooo, innocent!
And it's us plebs...
..that are forced to do annual 'ethics' training...
This doesn't mean we're guilty
When you pay to end an investigation and still try to claim innocence then you know someone's having a laugh.
Games Theory v Justice
The cost of cooperating with the investigation and defending against a court case has to be set against the cost of settling early. It is not a question of guilty or innocent, it is a balance of costs and probabilities. If we are acquited (insert probability) what do we get, if found guilty (1 minus previous probability) what would the punative fine be? Now stack up against the cost of the payoff. Take least cost option.
Of course the probabilities would be affected by what they know of the evidence available. that just affects the size of the swing between the choice of settling and going to court.
IMHO the gap between the punishment if found guilty and the cost of settling out of court distorts any conclusions about guilt or innocence.
Probably better to settle early as it keeps the money from going to the lawyers (on both sides).
It's OK, we have a training course for this.
Will this be included as a practical example in next year's mandatory Ethics "Training" Course for the workers?
I can't wait...
Wondering about HP
IF it's part of that Intel kickback like Dell
"part of that Intel kickback like Dell"
Unlikely. Dell is basically a pure Intel shop and that's the way Intel and Dell want(ed) it to stay. HP has a long history of AMD product in desktops, laptops, and servers.
"It is not a question of guilty or innocent,"
Says who? The people with the money? Oh, that's all right then. I guess that makes "the war on drugs" a bit specious though, 'cos there's a lot of money there, but maybe they too are neither guilty nor innocent, so we could just call the whole silly thing off and get Tesco to do the sourcing and distribution, and collect the tax. Right?
Dura lex sed lex -
unless, of course, one is a wealthy corporation (a juridical construction, which, according to the US Supreme Court, inherently possesses all the rights that the US Constitution gives real persons), in which case one pays a minor fine and admits no guilt. Ain't capitalism grand ?...
Henri
This topic is closed for new posts.
Sign up, sign up for Blocks and Files, The Reg's weekly storage newsletter
Popular Whitepapers
- Linux on the Desktop
Lessons from mainstream business adoption - The Register Guide to iSCSI
A primer on Internet SCSI, a protocol to transport SCSI commands over IP - The BI Inflexion Point
Information is a right, not a privilege - The Evolving Security Landscape
Reg Webinar - The Register Guide to email security
A primer on the challenges of securing email and approaches to resolving them - The Register's Green Computing Debate
An on-demand webcast
