Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust has incurred the wrath of the Sun by spunking £7,500 on a "special room" kitted out to help chaps deliver vital supplies of man oysters. The trust's fertility centre shared the cost of "computer equipment worth £4,625, flat screen TVs costing £2,225 - plus £500 of blue movies" with private …
Someone has to say it
Something like this deserves to be reported with plenty of pictures!
The Taxpayers' Alliance
Who are they exactly? I pay tax, but how dare they claim to speak for me? They've never canvassed my opinion, or invited me to join.
And some of the outright toss they come out with beggers belief. So much so that I am not even going to back that statment up with any evidence.
They're just like the Audit Office
They claim to be independent (which they are in the sense of non-gov and non-quango), but just push a rightwing small-government agenda of destroying anything that doesn't immediately and financially benefits the middle class.
Sieze the day!
"They've never canvassed my opinion, or invited me to join."
Chin up poppet. I'm sure they'll let you join if you ask nicely.
Not like the NAO
The National Audit Office is a statutory body, it reports to parliament.
The Taxpayers' Alliance is a think tank.
who are the Taxpayers' Alliance?
To quote the *other* TaxPayers' Alliance (at www.taxpayersalliance.ORG - yes rather confusing):
"it isn't an alliance of ordinary taxpayers at all. It is an alliance of right-wing ideologues. Its academic advisory council is a who's who of the proponents of discredited Thatcherite policies, including Eamonn Butler and Madsen Pirie of the Adam Smith Institute, academics Patrick Minford and Kenneth Minogue, and former Institute of Directors policy head Ruth Lea."
So no, they don't speak for you, they speak for people who are already richer than we'll ever be and want to stay that way.
What a load of wank
surely The Sun could simply donate a few copies and let these generous gents get there jollies to Debbie, 23, from Southend instead?
Never mind the copies...
Couldn't they donate a few originals?
Title is required
Given the amount of malware and nastiness that tends to lurk on porn sites, it seems far safer to offer them videos/DVDs rather than an Internet connection. P.S. I wonder if the £500 of porn includes any specialised fetish stuff for those who aren't interested in anorexic Barbie dolls.
its the NHS
of course they will, £500 should cover a sufficiently PC broad spectrum of (non-extreme, because that's naughty) tastes and ethnicities
"Just an internet connection"
I like the TPA logic: "here's a cable, it's a high speed internet connection, enjoy your viewing! --- that saves the NHS buying two TVs".
Or do they think that two pc's plus screens would be equally free as the bother of keeping these malware-free --- two internet-facing computers left alone with the unsupervised w*nkers seems to be asking for trouble.
Not the TPA again
Is there anything that bunch of whingers wouldn't moan about? I preferred the days when rentaquotes came from back bench Tory MPs rather than right wing lobbying groups.
Paper is more expensive
Paper "facilitators" cannot be disinfected to "hospital standard" after use. Cough... cough... They will actually cost more than AV over the equipment depreciation period.
Paris, as she will cost even more...
This occured to me, trying to retain from decorum, surely some form of covering for said equipment would required? That's organic material your chucking about there!
"Rhythm magazines" can get very tatty over time, with too much use...erm so I am led to believe.
What a productive use of my time this is...
>>>>"Rhythm magazines" can get very tatty over time, with too much use...erm so I am led to believe.
Surely some sort of music stand would solve this problem, and give plenty of re-use. As well as freeing up the other hand for texting, eating cream cake or interchangeable use for those ambidextrous wankers...
On the one occasion
when I have been required to provide a sample there was no stimulating material of any type provided. UCH cost efficiency there.
Thinks of that scene from The Right Stuff...
Surely all you need is to hum the Marines Hymn really, really loudly...
In all probability
its recovered from the actual cost of fertilisation treatment, which cannot be claimed as an expense, unlike WJ's hubby tried to do (no we have not forgotten ).
TA are a bunch of right-wing UKIP rejects - if anything they make the UKP look like a bunch of lightweight liberals. They'd prefer a big union flag to raise thier feelings to where they would attempt to keep the Empire running. That or just praying to a figurine of Mrs T for fertility. .
They don't want any old Thomas, Richard or Harold (who may not actually be English) procreating.
"Southampton University Hospital NHS Trust gets its jazz mags free from the publisher."
Aww, which one?? I think this is such a really nice gesture I wanna know who the thoughtful smut merchant is!
...on computer gear or £7500 for wet wipes over a year to clean the keyboard attached to the PC with internet access.
I do see what all the fuss is about as I don't think the NHS has tossed the money down the drain.
Grenade because that's another thing that gets tossed.
Lack of imagination
I don't understand why the clients would even need pictures. Surely a mental image of the little lady at home would be enough? And if it isn't, surely that is an important part of the diagnosis?
Who are all these people wearing white coats?
In a certain south London hospital
You have to do the deed in a toilet on another ward. Nowhere in that section to do the deed. Quite how you're supposed to produce quality jizz for testing or insemination when you're stuck in a cubicle stinking of crapola I have no idea. Add to that blocking up a toilet for a (potentially desperate and about to soil themselves) patient and overall it left a very unsatisfactory experience all round.
£7.5k may be a bit much for such a room but I'd rather have that than the stinking "wankers' karzi" any day.
what is the world coming to?
However congratulations on this seminal piece of writing.
Where do I sign up...
Erm, this is a shared facility; the NHS didn't stump up all the costs & it probably cost alot more in managerial junkets/meetings to organise than the equipment itself. Personally I applaud such schemes - a friend of mine had to give a "sample" some years ago - he was ushered into a cold, dimly lit grubby room furnished with a basic plastic chair and a wonky legged table and some well thumbed copies of certain low quality magazines. Understandably he had some trouble in producing a sample under such conditions. A well kitted out room should help to stimulate a more reliable and faster response from the patient/donor whilst helping to reduce the fear/embarassment suffered.
"a friend of mine..."
Ah, right, yes, a *friend*, of course... ;-)
Re: Where do I sign up...
"....this is a shared facility...."
I have to say that I find that rather more disturbing than the grubby room with the wonky table and so on.
Whatever happened to rubber-glove wearing, prostate-tickling matron?
... was contracted out to the Private Sector and now is doing the same job for £150 a hour for "tired city gents"...
Sense of proportion
How much? Less than 10 grand. And it hasn't exactly been wasted - the equipment, while sounding a bit on the pricey side and a touch excessive (why TV plural?), is actually being used; although I suspect that it would have been a lot cheaper to use the chief exec's cast-off laptops without wiping the contents (ugh!) first - AND they'd have got better, but probably illegal, porn.
Let's face it, it's not exactly on a par with the billions extra over 30 years that the various NHS PFI schemes are costing.
If the trust "shared the costs" of
IT (£4,625), a telly (£2,225) and some DVDs (£500), and managed to spend £7,500, is this a euphemism for "subsidising a private facility"? Or are the Sun and the TPA just bad at adding up numbers?
Also, closing one's eyes is basically free, if you ignore the initial setup costs (which are met by the service user, not the provider).
Having used the old style facilities...
...I didn't think there was anything wrong with the old style paper copies. Replace them every so often, nice and easy.
Besides, would you want to go in and touch that keyboard if it had been in use all day?
I wonder if the room is in use outside normal working hours. It may have been approved by senior NHS managers, so they could spank their own monkey. Just sayin'.
Struggling to find reasons why they were justified:
- there may be a legitimate case of wanting dudes to produce good quality and quantity of spunk; it might just be necessary. It must waste a lot of time when people can't choke the chicken - tick-tock, tick-tock; time is money.
- Also, in this day and age, I feel people have become 'spoiled' in terms of pr0n.
I thought the Snu would be behind this sort of thing
and perhaps drive over their bus of page 3 girls to lend support
.. what about us guys who preferred the Page 8 Mate ?
Oh yeah, sorry
I'll get them to send along the other bus as well...
As someone who has used such a room....
...what is needed is a bigger jug to hold the stuff in!
I'm not joking here...trying to aim at a sub 40mm diameter opening at the critical point is almost effin impossible. I've even tried wedging me todger end in there and it still doesn't work.
Oh and there's never any tissues to mop up the little buggers that have escaped being potted.
The one I went to ,the room was just behind reception, so listening to Tracy and Sharon discussing Darren whilst trying to beat the retreat...well you can imagine,
I for one.....
...no not that quote
Hey, £7.5k is a tad expensive, but I wouldn't like to use crispy second-hand (litterally) magazines, plus it recognises the value of our wigglies, in these new days of loss of anonymity of donors (and decreasing numbers of donors) it should also be recognised it's an important service, I suspect that you're still getting a good bang for your buck, averaged out over the cumming months it's probably quite cheap for each (money) shot.
Wish they had this when I had to leave a deposit, I had to knock one out in the toilet as there was no "facility" for such, despite testing the stuff there.
Analysis was normal, BTW.
How dare they...
Bringing the NHS donation service kicking and screaming into the century of the fruitbat.....
Anyway isn't paper dead?
"Anyway isn't paper dead?"
It certainly is. At least it doesn't grow when I plant it.
Complaining about this is ridiculous
Yes, it's all very amusing, nudge-nudge.
It's not so funny when you are in the position of having to produce a sample on demand during IVF treatment. Knowing that your partner is about to undergo an uncomfortable and expensive procedure which has a good chance of not working is not really conducive to getting the job done and being stuck in a broom cupboard with a couple of dog-eared, old magazines doesn't help either.
I can't believe I'm the first
to ask for a Playmobil reconstruction.
Actually, the NHS is probably doing this on the cheap. I expect BUPA hospitals provide scantily dressed nurses.
Beat me to it!
Darn, I thought I was going to get in first there, how did no one request one earlier!
- Vid Hubble 'scope snaps 200,000-ton chunky crumble conundrum
- Bugger the jetpack, where's my 21st-century Psion?
- Windows 8.1 Update 1 spewed online a MONTH early – by Microsoft
- Google offers up its own Googlers in cloud channel chumship trawl
- Something for the Weekend, Sir? Why can’t I walk past Maplin without buying stuff I don’t need?