The government has been urged by MPs to tighten controls on pre-paid credit cards, with claims they help child abusers avoid detection online. Labour MP Geraint Davies said the cards were routinely used by paedophiles to hide their identities as he proposed a bill on Wednesday to force credit card companies to act. He wants …
God we are ruled by morons.
Do they even have any evidence that this is the case?
And I'm pretty sure they're rather traceable as I'd expect that the card has an identifier that will flag up where the card was topped up and at what time, most of these locations will have some form of cctv or a person with a memory of somesort (neither are perfect, but likely easier to track then stolen cards/details)
Should Banks be liable for the abuse when a card is stolen and used? Or just the poor sod whose details were stolen?
Joined up thinking? We've heard of it.
Why would we need evidence when this is about protecting children? Al you need to do is mention children (or drugs) and evidence takes a back seat to knee jerk reactions.
Tell you what though, now that this has been publicised I bet a lot of pedos will go and buy them rather than use their own credit cards. Talk about an own goal.
You pretty much nailed my first thought on reading this: Is there any evidence or is this just a shabby attempt at self-publicity?
Think of the children!
Oh wait, isn't that what Gary Glitter does?
god help us all
I bet you these cards are used to buy made-up drugs like cake.
Needs to be an international initive
There is no good banning these in the UK when you can walk into any store in the US (or I guess anywhere else on the planet) and buy one of these things.
Pre-paid credit cards are a great anti fraud tool. Rather than giving companies I don't know and don't necessarily trust my real credit card number, which could then be hit for lots of dosh and I'd end up with a big argument with the cc firm, I just use a pre-paid one when shopping on sites I don't know too well. That way I know the sum total of my exposure is £100. Much safer. Not sure I feel the need for an anonymous one, especially now the Stalinist dictatorship have been given the heave ho.
@ Dazed and Confused
Great anti fraud tool? Doesn't your bank offer a "virtual credit card" service?
I want one!
I had heard about these things but thought they were only available to customers of some online banks as numbers to be used for online transactions. I had heard about them in the US too.
Now I know they're in the UK I wonder how I've missed them and where I can get one. There are plenty of places, from untrustworthy looking fuel stations to overseas online retailers where I wouldn't want to give my real credit card details for fear of being wiped out -- but one of these would be ideal.
So, before they go, does anyone know where I could buy one?
Get one ...
They're in most of my (London inner-city) corner stores. Go anywhere you'd expect to find significant numbers of people who don't use regular banking services. Same sorts of places you'll find paypoint terminals and pre-paid phone cards.
I don't imagine it would work if these MPs got their way. Pre-paid credit cards, like any other credit cards, are valid world-wide, so I would expect those with something to hide to buy theirs abroad. The people they would hurt would be people who CANNOT get a regular credit card: undischarged bankrupts, people with awful credit scores, recent immigrants with no UK credit history, under-18s, etc.
3V Card is good. You top it up at PayPoint locations such as the newsagents and the receipt they give you has a Visa number with CVV and expiry on it. You can top up £20 for free or pay I think £1.50 for topping up another amount.
There are quite a few pre-paid suppliers in the UK, but not as many as the US
Oh yes, Yes Please, YES PLEASE AAAH YES YES YES
More assault on privacy! In the name of the chiiildruuun!!!1!oneeleventy!
Because financial institutions, beyond requiring retailers to keep enough personal information to impersonate us, also should pass moral judgement on what we do. Because even the police isn't allowed to do that, that's what we have judges for.
Somebody please smack these stale bozos over the head with a large frying pan.
Cheapest way to send money
I have used pre pay cards for years, both as emergency money when I am traveling, and as a way to send money to people I know abroad.
There are also very useful for families with teenage children who want some independence, they can have a card with a fixed amount of spending power; it is more secure than cash and can be used for on-line purchases where the E-store does not accept the few Debit cards under 18's can apply for; and as mentioned, if the E-store turns out to be dodgy, they cant take very much.
This MP is a Tw@t!!!
Commercial CP is a Myth
...Certainly on the scale this latest chancer would like you to believe. Go read CEOP's latest review for '09-10. It's a free download from their site - why, even a troglodyte politician could manage that, I'm sure. Inside, you'll find tons of interesting facts, figures and observations about the current state of hosted CP worldwide. It's not hard to miss CEOP's frank admissions that 'most' CP is freely distributed online via social networking sites and public (i.e. not hidden) image hosting sites. The reality of 'commercial' CP, according to this source (and they should know, one hopes) is that it has been in decline for years and is now very much on the wane - found only on Eastern European servers in the main and in very random, scattered (and transitory) occurances elsewhere. The UK, btw, hosts much less than 1% of all CP online - free or otherwise.
This f*ckwit politician - NuLabour, of course - really should do his research instead of spouting these tabloid-baiting headline grabbers. If this government has even one good eye it'll tell him to go take a hike. The days of banning and censoring everything have hopefully disappeared with the passing of Comrade Brown and his Politburo - and the days of shouting 'think of the children!' to get instant (bad) law should not be far behind.
Don't be so sure it's a myth
Don't be so sure. I'm quite certain that wherever there is a demand for something and profit to be made, someone will supply it. Obviously, purveyors of CP won't advertise openly. They will be out there at the (hopefully far) fringes of the black economy, just as we know there is a market in illegal drugs, women forced into prostitution, slaves, babies (illegal "adoption"), even human organs.
Exactly what I was thinking. I'm completely certain that in the time I've had net access if this kind of stuff or the other favourite - commercial snuff porn actually existed I'd at least have had 1 spam email or 1 annoying redirect to it (back in the days of ie5 ya know when I was a little n00b). Yet have I? Not a single one.
This guy needs to stop reading Labour's own propaganda and actually check for himself before opening his stupid mouth.
Not all prepaid cards are the same
Prepaid credit cards are also ideal methods of ensuring you don't get ripped off when buying goods online. Top up the card with the amount required for the purchase you wish to make, complete the purchase of the goods, and leave the card empty when not required. This prepaid card requires submission of valid personal details to be obtained, and of course the only easy way to transfer funds to it is directly from your own bank account, I've not come across top-up kiosks or anything like that but I guess they might exist in the larger cities.
Now the type of prepaid card I'm familiar with is obviously different to these anonymous cards sold at service stations. So the real issue is tackling the sale of anonymous credit cards. Also makes me wonder how many underage kids are abusing these things to obtain goods they're not entitled to? Win-win if we kill off anonymous credit cards I reckon.
"Labour MP Geraint Davies said the cards were routinely used by paedophiles to hide their identities as he proposed a bill on Wednesday to force credit card companies to act."
I wonder if the Honourable Gentleman has any evidence to support this supposition. I also wonder if the Hon Gent has any ties to any businesses who stand to make a profit by the removal of such pre-paid cards from the market, such as the providers of non-pre-paid cards?
Just wondering. Out loud. As it were...
For some reason, I seem to have developed the nervous habit of never taking anything a politician says at face value any more.
...I have developed the nervous habit of never taking anything an Englishman says at face value any more.
What do you mean?
What do you mean 'any more'?
Anonymous troll from Ireland
If it is routine, they can they can just follow the little trail of breadcrumbs back to the ip addresses used? Unless we have to now be so scared that they are all IT experts too who can use anoymous proxies (which of course can still be required to reveal logs)
I don't buy it. I bet it is a tiny, tiny minority of the people who use the cards and once again the dregs of the NuLabia bandwagon is trying to disrupt the majority on the basis that a tiny, tiny minority of people may be doing a bad thing.
Newflash, a tiny, tiny minority of people will ALWAYS do a bad thing. Live with it. Try and minimise it by all means but, really, don't ruin everything good because of a tiny minority, whether it's terrorists or fiddlers.
Remember swirly-face guy
Photoshop was used to hide paedophiles too. So therefore...
Technical knowledge icon, 'cos MPs have none.
The MP may be so stupid as to believe what he's saying, I suppose, but I am quite sure that the actual reason for this proposed law is to increase govt's knowledge of and control over all private transactions. The govt wants you to act only in those ways that it finds non-threatening, and the govt is perfectly willing - happy, even - to threaten its people with fines, jail, and potentially violence for the uncowed if they engage in such activity.
Do you understand now? It's not really about the children. (-;
Suppose they do. It will immediately create a new market for untraceable cards that some lively entrepreneur could jump into (as the new LibCon government seems keen to encourage). Buy them at £100, sell them on for £120 (or whatever the market decides the clearing price for an 'anonymous' card is). All perfectly legal, unless reselling a card is also made illegal in the legislation. Just remember to declare your business earnings on your tax return. So in a nutshell, the legislation will do nothing, except possibly placate the Daily Mail and the think of the children brigade, and make money for people (plus eBay's cut).
Typical NuLabour Nonsense
probably on the back of heresay with no evidence whatsoever, in addition, with more and more and more legislation, rules, bigbrother etc etc than ever before, if the number of people doing this is increasing perhaps the powers that be need to think of an alternative and more sensible approach?
Didn't we change government a few months back? You may have slept through that.
Typical NuLabour Nonsense???
Did you type that out of habit?
"Labour MP Geraint Davies said the cards were routinely used by paedophiles to hide their identities as he proposed a bill on Wednesday to force credit card companies to act"
Now if it were ever to become law it would need some support from both sides of the house but as all sense goes out of the window when paedophiles are mentioned that wouldn't be too hard. It's still a new labour pushed idea.
A British disease
Yet again it looks like the Majority will have to suffer for the (so far unproven) actions of a very very small minority.
Yes, paedophilia is and disgusting, but why does the establishment believe everyone is a paedophile until they register and are verified as "not a paedophile". Outlaw the actions of the minority, NOT THE MAJORITY.
RIP "innocent until proven guilty"
If the MP had highlighted the fact that these pre-paid cards are targeted at the financially vulnerable who often cannot obtain a conventional credit or debit card and carry disproportionally high-fees, he might have had more of a case.
Cameras in every home
He would be one of the ones that would like to put cameras in every home to prevent child abuse. Why don't they just trace the IP address of the person visiting the site?
Be pro technology and think up new ways to track them as opposed to proposing bans. Heck why doesn't he just ban the internet, that will do the trick as well.
Why should they be tracked?
I certainly do not want everything that I purchase being tracked, logged and potentially used against me in either a future marketing campaign or used to blackmail me if I buy something slightly questionable (but legal).
This is why I usually pay for things in cash, obviously on-line I cannot do that, so pre-paid cards are ideal.
Pre-paid Credit Card?
Doesn't anyone see the fail there?
Next logical step....
If anonymous transactions are such a bad thing, they'd better look at banning that awful cash stuff too - for the sake of the children of course.
Hasn't he noticed yet that they lost?
NuLab are still trying the garbage that lost them the election.
Here's a way for citizens of this country do conduct their personal business without the government being able to spy on everything they do and record all the details in massive databases. It Must Be Stopped!!!
What shall we use? Oh, no problem, the old paedophile trick we've been using for years still has some life in it.
"Child Pornography!!! Think Of The Children!!! Something Must Be Done!!!"
There, that should do it. Still, it's a bit difficult to actually pass laws banning these cards.
Ah, I know, we'll use another old trick - force the private companies to act as unofficial, unpaid police for us. They can do things we're not allowed to do, they'll be forced to heavily over-react in case there's a tiny slip and we yell "Paedophiles!" at them, and when there's complaints we can look perfectly innocent and claim it's not our fault that they did the things they did, and that the arm we're twisting behind their back is nothing at all to do with it.
These fulfill a useful niche as not all have silly charges and therefore allow to budget with money they have rather than the money someone will lend. Give them the security on line as with a normal credit card unlike paying with your cash card. Also handy tip here for electron cards to avoid CC charges on flights http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/travel/beat-budget-airline-charges.
The real reason
Government are scared of anonymous movements of money. When I first signed up for pay pal(before ebay got them) all I needed was an e-mail address. the US government had a shit fit . Went on about how this would be used to fund drug dealers and terrorist . Now the US government regulators them SS# .
track and trace
It leads back to an oft-argued issue between the U.S. and others - whether all electronic payments should be traceable. The U.S. wants them to be, and E.U. seems to wish otherwise.
I don't have an answer but this is the nub of the question. All the stuff about CP is merely window-dressing. Nothing more.
The U.S. is making cash harder to use. The largest note ("bill") is $100 and many stores will not accept ones larger than $20.
Credit or Debit?
A 'credit' card involves credit ie, owing the issuing bank money. A prepaid card is a 'Debit' card.
No wonder our banking system in in such a mess when ministers don't appear to know the difference. I'd be more worried about the govts inability to understand basic finance over the worry of what people 'may' be doing with these cards!
My thought exactly!
If you're taking money out of a pot you are being debited the bank isn't extending you a line of credit!
And we wonder why this country has a problem with consumer debt when people (including politicians) can't even make such a simple distinction!
I am not certain but...
I will admit I have never used one of these, as I just have a couple of cards, one in my wallet, and one with a relatively low credit limit which never leaves the house and is only ever used online.
I believe some of these cards may be termed "credit cards" even though no debt is permitted as credit cards come under different legislation.
Debit cards are usually linked to a bank account (current or savings), but there should be not charges made to the holder or retailer when using them to buy things. The retailer only has to pay the equivalent of rental on the equipment.
Credit cards provide much more protection than Debit cards, as the issuer imposes charges on the retailer, which is why you sometimes get charged more for using them.
Those retailer charges is the main reason why AmericanExpress is not accepted in most UK retailers as AmEx charge ~5%, compared with the more typically charge ~3% of the others.
Doesn't go far enough!
Never mind anonymous credit cards - there is clear evidence that some disgusting paedo scum have been paying prostitutes with a form of virtually untraceable anonymous paper promissory notes, available in various denominations of £5,£10, £20, £50 and so on - lets see the person responsible for dishing out these dodgy documents behind bars at once - never mind if he calls himself the Governor of the Bank of England - no-one's above the law. (Well, okay, actually bankers ARE above the law, otherwise given what they were responsible for, they'd all be gently swinging from Tyburn Tree providing a feast for the crows)
wont someone think of the children
Surely rather than trying to band anonymous prepaid cards which they should just go after the people selling the images, or perhaps that would involve too much police work or as i expect more likely there really isn't any commericial child pron anymore since VISA and mastercard cracked down on rouge banks and merchant accounts holders a few years ago after operation ore and similar investigations. And now kiddy pron is 'traded' for free on underground site on tor or encypted files emailed between pedos
If they do require you show iD to prove who you are, who is going to entrust a shop keeper or petrol station assistant with personal information such as Name, DOB, passport number etc, when this is a gold mine of information for doing some nice identity fraud.
If they do ban anoymous credit cards then whats to stop them using other anoymous money service like western union, moneygram or even just cash
I hate prepaid cards - or the lazy banks...
At least 2/3 times a month we have to phone the bank to cancel direct debits that they never check. Having traced the numbers they all go back to a Natwest bank up north that supplies topup facilities for prepaid cards. So send in your dodgy DD and if it gets through the money goes straight onto your prepaid card, off you go.
Another 'out to lunch' technophile MP
The guy hasn't a clue. There are so many methods of paying money anonymously, still, both from within the UK and elsewhere.
The US thinks it has international money transmission under control, which is illusional; sure they have made it a pain but I can personally attest that big money is travelling worldwide, and I'm not discussing crime-related (drugs, etc).
Besides, requiring ID is pointless for people using payments systems can get false ID with ease. Just another Labour MP burdening the books with dumb laws.
Have these people not HEARD of Operation Ore?
You know, the one where a lot of innocent people were charged by Jim Gamble and co with downloading CP because they had been the victims of *CREDIT CARD THEFT*??
Yes, that's right their card details had been *stolen*, just like many other people's card details are stolen every year.
So what's to stop someone *stealing* someone's pre-paid credit card and using that to download CP?
Oh, that's right, *nothing*.
Typical reg commentard nonsense
Explain why being able to identify the owner of a credit card is such a heinous invasion of your privacy. 'bigbrother' my arse.
It is simply none of your or anybody else's fucking business.
If you think it is, post your name and address. I'd like to drop
by every few weeks and read your mail - bank statements
Why it's a big deal
Do you seal the envelope when you send a letter? Do you have curtains at your windows? A lock on your bathroom door?
The point is, if I am engaged in a financial transaction, that is nobody else's business save mine and the other party's. And that means nobody else needs to know. And that means they can keep their beaks out and get on with the stuff they're actually supposed to be doing.
Future generations will no doubt be able to pinpoint the moment when the balance tipped, and you became more likely to become a victim of paedophile hysteria than a victim of paedophilia.
Typical Idiot non sense
It has little to do with being able to identify the owner of the prepaid, but instead the withdrawal of an opportunity for people that have no access to credit or debit cards to be able to use the wide array of services that demand cards.
Also are the cards really anonymous as they need to be topped up by someone, somewhere, which will leave a paper trail.
No, I declare you incapable of thought.
When they came for, I said nothing
>Explain why being able to identify the owner of a credit card is such a heinous invasion of your >privacy. 'bigbrother' my arse
Because the day that go to amazon to buy:
1 x Nightvision goggles
1 x Photography for dummies
1 x London A-Z
1 x Chemistry for beginners
1 x SAS Survival Handbook
1 x Selfdefence for beginners
I dont want my name to ping up on a list at GCHQ!
- YARR! Pirates walk the plank: DMCA magnets sink in Google results
- Pics Whisper tracks its users. So we tracked down its LA office. This is what happened next
- Review Xperia Z3: Crikey, Sony – ANOTHER flagship phondleslab?
- OnePlus One cut-price Android phone on sale to all... for 1 HOUR
- UNIX greybeards threaten Debian fork over systemd plan