Something that has always bothered me
There's something that has always bothered me about these kind of announcements. 35M in savings? Where exactly do they get these kinds of savings? Savings BILLION pounds across the agency? It leaves me with some serious questions.
Who was running the agency (or indeed any agency or corporation or what have you) with that kind of excess floating around? Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't the people in charge of corporations and government agencies supposed to be running everything as close to the bone as possible all the time?
So who failed? And why aren't their heads on pikes?
The other side to that is...are these "savings" imaginary? Are they in fact short term cuts that go too far that will lead to long term costs as agencies scramble to recover from the multi-year funding deficit and provide basic services?
I was under the impression that people went to University and got all sorts of fancy degrees so that they could create things like budgets that were – to the dollar – exactly what needed to be spent. Not a dollar over, not a dollar under, but what needed to be spent.
Over and over we wobble through this “spend too much, spend too little” crap…when do the bankers and MBAs and all these folks start actually earning their salaries? As it stands, a simple blue collar Sysadmin such as myself could do as good or better a job running these places as these folks seem to.
Fail, because, well…