A US military tech project aimed at developing portable, functional battlefield energy weapons has successfully achieved initial goals and is now moving on towards "weapons-class performance levels". The project in question is the optimistically-named Revolution In Fiber Lasers (RIFL), ultimately intended to deliver war-grade …
will have to make do with a koi with head mounted Spyder III Pro 1W laser until this gets more efficient :(
Economics of Production
"..the Reg's apparently large readership of evil billionaires may have to wait a while."
These things can only get cheaper as time goes by so evil millionaires will be able to buy them and will drive up demand. After that, mass production will arrive and they will become commodity items. It's a veritable virtuous circle of villainy.
But It's Time...
...to start constructing the vocano hideaway.
Wot no boffins?
Not one mention of the words boffins or boffinry?
Refreshing, but what have you done to the real Lewis Page?
"for instance the slicing up of tiresome government operatives and/or their saucy female sidekicks while fastened down on a table" Thats not a problem. You can manage with any size laser for that, as long as you can point it where you need you can have the gubbins in another room, and it heat will not be a problem as you can use the sea as a heat sink , or vent it through the crater (Dependant on lair choice, and if you are more of a sub/boat supervillan or helecopter/rocket type).
Its the shark mouning that might be difficult, but it seems we have a little time to work on some form of super shark. A great white shark is clearly to small and a whale shark not aggressive enough. Perhaps some sort of cross bread? Or maybe a megalodon?
Some of us
evil billionaires just use a a wood working saw instead.... with the bonus that it can be used to build the 2 coffins needed after you've sliced up the enemy agent
Have they considered....
Water cooling? making the laser much more suited for attaching to the cranium of water based predators, which is what we all really want.
Clearly not Lewis Page
No mention of the ConDems being filthy peaceniks, or mines being the only significant tools of modern naval warfare.
...energy weapons actually deliver more striking power onto themselves...
And current bullet flinging technology transfers how much energy forward versus backward?
And in other arms news...
China has just started mass production of mirror coated missiles and increased it's supply of smoke grenades to it's infantry.
Forget smoke and mirrors.
China would be wasting money on such efforts since neither the smoke nor the mirrors would buy all that much time. Take the mirror coatings. They're not 100% reflective, especially not on a mobile base which can be exposed to moving air and particulate matter, which means at least some of the energy gets absorbed into the substrate. Absorb enough heat and it'll melt, distort, burn--IOW, your ruin the mirror. The more power you can pour onto it at a time, the quicker your ruin the mirror and really get down to business. As for smoke grenades, have you considered that perhaps a laser can simply burn through the smoke and use the sudden heating of the air to push away any smoke around the beam?
Phrase of the Day: Tri-Corner Reflectors
Make a big fat, attractive target out of paper mache and/or foam, with a suitably large tri-corner reflector embedded inside. First directed-energy weapon to come along will be firing on itself.
Maybe these DE weapons should have a target RCS measuring system before they actually let loose. A sort-of Pre-Fire Tri-corner Reflector Detector (PFTRD).
But then 'The Baddies' (TM) will layer the big fat, attractive target with a foil grid designed to reflect radar signals in the normal dispersed manner, but allow weapon wavelengths to pass or burn through to then be bounced back.
And so it goes...
Much similar to missiles, anti-missiles, anti-anti-missiles etc, ala Mad Magazine, circa 1961. The more things seem to change, the more they actually stay the same.
Praise the Lord, and pass the next defense appropriations bill.
At least 4 groups will be cheering
1)Laser confinement fusion looks a *bit* more plausible as the efficiency levels go up and (IIRC) the emission frequency moves down.
2)Space launch by laser also benefits. The classic method uses focused light onto the rear of a highly reflective craft to heat the air behind it (while in the atmosphere). More recent approaches use a high temperature absorber to heat a fluid (usually expected to be Hydrogen) before exhausting it through a nozzle.
3)Laser ignited pyrotechnics should be a lot less prone to electrostatic discharge and lightning in particular. More powerful diodes -> smaller numbers to fire multiple devices. To put this in perspective the space Shuttle had 300 pyrotechnics, of which 100 are routinely fired. Each has 2 pyrotechnic ignitors. All are electrically driven. The Shuttle cannot launch in bad weather at *all*.
4)Evil billionaires looking at a more viable piscine mounted weapon for disciplining unsatisfactory subordinates, secret agents etc.
The old energy weapon does me fine.
A tin of the misses' hairspray and Zippo still takes out any enemy that decides to stray into my territory, but thanks for thinking of me.
Megashark, where are you when we need you?
"Mega Shark vs. Giant Octopus" (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1350498/)
There's talk about a "Mega Python vs. Gatoroid" to follow.
Head-mounted lasers for sharks - an interim solution
Perhaps the huge laser equipment could be mounted in the floor above the shark tank, and light-conductive output cables (and trigger switches) can be dangled to the tank and affixed to the sharks.
Certainly there would be some trouble keeping them untangled, but I think two sharks should be manageable, and that's a good start. I dare say it sounds about right for proof-of-concept.
"Perhaps the huge laser equipment could be mounted in the floor above the shark tank, and light-conductive output cables (and trigger switches) can be dangled to the tank and affixed to the sharks."
Sounds like an outline funding proposal to me.
Navy? Special Forces? DARPA?
Should've called it
Revolution of Fiber Laser
just for a better acronym
- +Comment 'Stop dissing Google or quit': OK, I quit, says Code Club co-founder
- Nokia: Read our Maps, Samsung – we're HERE for the Gear
- Ofcom will not probe lesbian lizard snog in new Dr Who series
- Rejoice, Windows fans: Stable 64-bit Chromium drops for Win 7 and 8
- Episode 9 BOFH: The current value of our IT ASSets? Minus eleventy-seven...