Most Reg readers have moved on from the early days of virtualizing servers, when the idea was simply to consolidate and save floor space. Yesterday’s virtualization beta-testers are now fully versed in the virtualization game, and they're looking to get more bang for their buck with real projects that deliver benefits across …
Already virtualized "the hard stuff"
We use VMWare for small applications and infrastructure clutter.
We use PowerVM for all the database workloads and larger applications
- is easy for easy workloads
- is very expensive
- is not architected for heavy I/O
- cannot have a virtual machine larger than 8 threads
- easy but you need to use AIX versions of software
- makes Power systems cheap compared to x86+VMWare
- Can handle the highest transaction rates we have had on black Friday
- can scale from one thread to I heard over a thousand in the new boxes.
Its a matter of picking the right platforms for the right work vs. how to try to get VMWare to do something it was not made to do
- iPad? More like iFAD: We reveal why Apple ran off to IBM
- +Analysis Microsoft: We're making ONE TRUE WINDOWS to rule us all
- Climate: 'An excuse for tax hikes', scientists 'don't know what they're talking about'
- Analysis Nadella: Apps must run on ALL WINDOWS – PCs, slabs and mobes
- Yorkshire cops fail to grasp principle behind BT Fon Wi-Fi network