A civil liberties watchdog has challenged Facebook's legal claims that an unauthorized third-party site that helps users login automatically violates criminal laws. In a friend-of-the-court brief filed Monday, the Electronic Frontier Foundation said Facebook users have a legal right to choose how they access their accounts. It …
Third party Facebook login?
The only third party Facebook login service I ever tried was at ReadWriteWeb, and that was rubbish. I couldn't work out how to log in at all.
Do I as say, not as I do.....
"We have sued Power to prevent Power - a third party with unknown security safeguards and data use practices"
Surely this is an oxymoron of Facebook, if there ever was one.
Facebook is evil
To see why, go to http://bit.ly/cL8tLJ)
If you wish to delete your facebook account, do not use their 'disable' function, as it does not delete your account, or even hide it effectively.
Instead, go to http://bit.ly/aXZwWc
Alternatively, you might like to investigate Green Safe at
Something tells me...
Seems like suing world+dog won't get Facebook very far in the big picture. I think their assumed success has gone to their head. They are nothing compared to the likes of Microsoft, Apple, and Google; yet Zuckerberg acts like he owns the Internet and all the information people share using it. Something tells me that the Facebook bubble is going to pop soon and all that they've built is going to come crashing down once people begin migrating off of Facebook to a new site, just as many did when they left Friendster for MySpace, then MySpace for Facebook some years ago.
Hypocrisy at its finest
You just have to love Facebook claiming that they are worried about Power's privacy and security. If you sign up with Power ventures, you know the service you're subscribing to. OTOH, when you set up a Facebook account, you have to look at Dark Reading and several other tech columns on a regular basis to find out when Facebook has changed their privacy practices AGAIN and what to do about it to protect your information.
Totally agree. Pot and kettle.
For them to crow about privacy and security with their current abusive behavior and the rabble of 3rd party applications is rich. There needs to be a major change in the way these companies are permitted to do things, and for one "Opt In" should be the default.
The argument that they are providing a service still does not make users subject to any whim and change of policy, nor does it give them rights over users' data any more than it would permit forced, uncompensated labor simply because that is how they decide to write their terms of service.
IF Facebook are so woried about their clientsmembers security WHY do all their preferances updates all revert your choices to let the WORLD +DOG see them I have had to reset them at least 3 times since I signed on just six months ago.
If you made a few dozen accounts filled mostly with bull shit, would it be possible to devalue Facebook's position? I'm guessing that by throwing enough bad apples into the bananas the buyers of the data wouldn't be able to get enough reliable information to be able to make effective marketing campaigns. It could have a catchy name like operation spambook. Arrr...
Interesting concept. I fear that a trivially set up fake account would be easy enough to spot algorithmically. A more in-depth effort could be harder to spot, but would be almost as time-consuming to maintain as a real Facebook account. I can't imagine even hardcore privacy advocates putting in the effort required. I wonder if it would be possible to create the content algorithmically though? It would be like the whole spam vs. spam-filter war all over again, although this time the spammers would be the goodies.
To be fair
To be fair, facebook provide a service paid for by advertising.
Power were just stealing their content.
that may be, but
it doesn't make what Facebook are doing necessarily legal
Re:To be fair
To be fair, facebook provide a shite service paid for by advertising.
There, fixed it.
"just stealing their content"
Whose content? It's not Facebook's.
While FBs privacy practices are laughable I think they may have a point. When you sign up to FB you accept that THEY will have access to your data and you will be able to control others access to that data not some other non aligned company. While I may be happy for my data to go to Power when I sign up to their service I am also sending my friends data (who probably havn't signed up) to Power when they scrape data from my account. Not sure of the legalities in this situation so it could be that FB are doing some arse covering here in case someone complains.
Just say no
... to all web 2.0 social media diarrhoea..
Hmmm so "Facebook's terms of service bar users from accessing their information through "automatic means"
Ok then what do they call the "Keep me logged in Button" then? surely that's an automatic means of logging in as is the ability of most browsers to remember your UN & PW.
Oh and then of course there's the iphone apps, the android apps........
Their terms - which users agree to
2.You will not collect users' content or information, or otherwise access Facebook, using automated means (such as harvesting bots, robots, spiders, or scrapers) without our permission.
Notice those last three words - if an App has their permission it's OK.
"The brief comes in a lawsuit Facebook filed against Power Ventures, which offers a service that aggregates friends, messages and other data from a variety of social networking sites. "
... which sounds *really* safe. Now you only have to guess one password and you've accessed every social networking site the person is registered to.
Convenient for everyone involved. One ring to rule them all etc.
Ha ha haaa
"We have sued Power to prevent Power - a third party with unknown security safeguards and data use practices... "
I'll finish that off....
"...whereas with us, you know our security is shit and we don't gove a toss about deleting old accounts and retaining data forever."
Whose content now? FB don't create the content surely, just the portal that displays the FB Users content, however much FB want to claim ownership?
These are the people who will 'borrow' your email password so that they can hoover contacts out of your address book...
Umpteen mobile phone apps aggregate data from FB, and a dozen other sites, by cacheing your credentials at a third-party server. Does FB want to shut them all down?
There are plenty of security concerns here - but as others have noted, it can only be in Zuckerberg's mind that FB is good and all the others are bad.
Is it just me
Who keeps thinking of it as "Fapbook"?
Yes it is. Firmly so. Now go and have a cold shower and a run around the house.
That was a *very* emphatic denial. Me think you doth protest too much.
Er, what has Apple, the iPhone and the iPad have to do with this story?
"It's worth noting that Facebook's attempts to stop users from accessing their content through alternate means isn't much different than Apple deciding what apps can run on its iPhones and iPads."
Top quality bollocks!
Facebook is scared you won't see their ads if you get updates in another UI, but it is quite a stretch, even if it does raise your Google listing, to wheel out the 'bash Apple for vetting apps' and try to link the two. DO Reg hacks have orders to link every story to Apple, the iPhone and the iPad, because it is getting somewhat boring and predictable.
By the way, one could argue that having your browser remember your login details is a type of 'Automation' that is in violation of Facebook's EULA
Quite agree - this is nothing like the Apple app store situation. Apple's app store is an invitation-only situation, whereas Facebook is primarily publically available. As long as 'Power' are not abusing the HTTP protocol then they cannot be doing anything wrong - all they are doing is acting as a fancy proxy. Copyright violation might have been a valid avenue, but not hacking.
Illegal my arse
$fb_result=$fb->fql_query("SELECT uid, name FROM user....."); blah blah blah
They provide a complete, supported api to do this kind of shit. You can even get a non-expiring token that gives your app permanent, login-free access to a facebook account.
Hmm.... I wonder why isn't Facebook so concerned about this problem when they offer to log into your email account "for" you, pilfer through whatever they find there, and grab out all your addresses?
Don't worry folks!
Facebook only has your best interest at heart. You can trust them, they're not like the other social scumbags, er, web sites.
Does a web browser count as "automated means"?
So they get to say which browser I can use?
And if I'm a user (which I'm not), isn't it MY CONTENT? Not Facebook's?
Facebook has ads???
I only just realised while reading this that there are ads on farcebook, I've only ever opened it with adblock running so never even realised.
Just goes to show how good adblock does its job
Pledge to leave Facebook
I've put a group together and we're all leaving facebook if they don't drop this lawsuit. I have got to draw the line somewhere and I cannot be associated with a company like Facebook.
- Xmas Round-up Ten top tech toys to interface with a techie’s Christmas stocking
- Exploits no more! Firefox 26 blocks all Java plugins by default
- Xmas Round-up Ghosts of Christmas Past: Ten tech treats from yesteryear
- Google embiggens its fat vid pipe Chromecast with TEN new supported apps
- Review Hey Linux newbie: If you've never had a taste, try perfect Petra ... mmm, smells like Mint 16