"PayPal is a fucking liar, a cheat and a thug," says Cryptome operator John Young. The eBay-owned payment service closed the Cryptome account last week, with over $5,000 of donations intended for Young in limbo. Last night Anuj Nayar, PayPal's global director of communications, told us by email that Cryptome's account had been …
WikiLeaks better watch out...
"PayPal is a fucking liar, a cheat and a thug,"
Yep, that pretty much sums PayPal up.
WikiLeaks better watch out, although they do use MoneyBookers as well.
So paypal is competing with apple?
Paypal looks to be competing with apple in the bad-customer-services market sector.
I expect a buy-out or merge soon!
Anyone using paypal...
.... is utterly clueless.
I know why Cryptome needed to use it but if you're an individual using it voluntarily then you're an utter moron. Ditto ebay.
Really don't use them...
Yes, Ebay's useful, but I wouldn't try this gang of so-and-sos anywhere near my bank details,
"PayPal is a fucking liar, a cheat and a thug"
So, what else is new?
If you rely on someone...
Don't risk pissing them off.
Crypthome has a PayPal account.
Crypthome publishes info that PayPal didn't want out there
Crypthome has to bend over and take it like a man
But to put these things into perspective, try this experiment. Go into your local bank, ask to speak to the bank manager, call them a "fucking liar, a cheat and a thug" and see how quickly he rushes to sort you out a increased overdraft.
I completely agree - insulting PayPal isn't going to make them want to help him. Conversely, he's not asking for a loan or any credit - He's simply asking to be allowed to access money which has been donated and is legally his.
Personally, I think they're both being twats
SMARTer Cyber Security Systems Required ..Call your nearest Virtually Secured Centre of Operations.
"But to put these things into perspective, try this experiment. Go into your local bank, ask to speak to the bank manager, call them a "fucking liar, a cheat and a thug" and see how quickly he rushes to sort you out a increased overdraft." ..... Anonymous Coward Posted Wednesday 10th March 2010 20:48 GMT
AC, Try this experiment and see if you get a similar reaction to the one which RBS give/gave. Go into your local bank, ask to speak to the bank manager with regard to their provisioning a funding facility for a new dynamic business with a strategy for protection of critical and strategically sensitive programs in the cyber virtual environment, [which all who would be reading El Reg here would surely recognise as THE Command and Control Environment which now powers and/or destroys earthly operating systems with SCADA exploits and others vulnerability probes/cyberborne invasions/hack attacks/call them what you will, and therefore THE MOST VITAL of Environments to Command with Future Control of Power Supply] and which faithfully and accurately would be a reflective mirror of their own model, and listen to the admission that it would be considered criminal and they would not wish to proceed.
Although you would not be wrong in suggesting that that would just your average bank employee who is never going to go anywhere and obviously not the right person to be chatting to. But the admission of their own criminality/theor own perception of criminality is not something you would normally expect them to be so forthright in providing. And of course, if not only a virtual perception but also a business reality, is it a Systemic Weakness which can be Easily Virtually Exploited to Transfer Wealth Remotely to SMARTer Players in the Banking Sector ...... or of course, if it be your wont, a Systemic Weakness vector which can be supplied to Others to Crash and Burn the Sector in a Scorched Earth Virtual Shark Feeding Frenzy.
Spookily enough, thoughts of third parties preparing for such shenanigans crossed my mind after reading Dan Goodin in San Francisco's piece, "Zeus botnets suffer mighty blow after ISP taken offline ... One quarter of C&C channels vanish" ..... http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/10/massive_zeus_takedown/ , with future activities now much more likely to accurately targeted against Virtual Machinery which actually renders Global Remote Command and Control of the Money System.
And Dan's last two paragraphs would certainly not disagree with that possibility/probability ..... "That has touched off speculation that the people running the botnets had advance notice that allowed them to build new botnets that would be unaffected by the action.
"It's certainly an odd coincidence," Landesman said. "I think it's an indication of possible forewarning and an attempt to get new bots out there.""
One does wonder at the Very Evident Distinctive Lack of Virtual Intelligence in the Executive Offices of the Global Banking Sector, that they would allow such Achilles Heel Vulnerabilities to Threaten their Model, whenever they have all the World's Wealth to Play with, and to Channel to Suppliers of Virtual Space Security, leading One to Believe that Fat Cats have No Greater Vision than to be just Fat Cats and thus are Easy Prey to ZerodDay Plays which Target the Systems that Support them and are being Systematically Fleeced.
Personally, I blame Ignorance ..... which opens the Door to Arrogance ..... which Allows Abuse.
That is just so typical of the Basic Anonymous Coward ........ Impotent and Subservient with No Get up and Go Gumption ..... and Quite Perfect for Life Long Abuse whenever Frightened or Unenabled in Searching for the Truth.
How does this put it into perspective? These comments on PayPal aren't from out of nowhere, and they aren't asking PayPal for an increased overdraft. If anything, your comment removes perspective.
If you rely on someone (or, rather, some corporation) and they basically steal your money, then I would suggest not relying on them any more, rather than bending over and lubing up. But, each to their own.
Why does anyone use them?
Don't use em
In the absence of an effective criminal justice system in the host country, the only thing we can do is NEVER USE PAYPAL. This is one turd I'm sure we'd all like to see flushed.
Paypal is a liar, cheat, and a thug.
Errr.... yep - sounds about right to me! That's the main reason I don't use eBay any more. Of course, Paypal isn't even covered by any kind of banking code (well, none of any use to non-Lichtenstein customers, because that's where it's based), and you effectively have no redress at all in case of dispute (which is WHY it moved to Lichtenstein, of course).
Can't help thinking that some sort of law should be passed to make it a legal requirement for such a service to be brought under the UK banking rules if it wants to trade here, especially considering the HUGE amounts of money it makes.
It is a scum organisation and should not be allowed to operate.
why I don't keep funds in paypal
I've closed my PayPal account in mild protest at their unethical handling of many a controversial situation.
Google checkout will have to fill the void, until something better comes along.
are the same sort of scum
want scans of all sorts of PRIVATE documents
told a retailer i spend a lot with that of they drop to Google and Paypal only my business goes bye-bye
"told a retailer i spend a lot with that of they drop to Google and Paypal only my business goes bye-bye"
Translation services provided
Translate mode on:
"I told a retailer that I spend a lot of money with, that if they decide to use only Google Checkout and Paypal (i.e. drop all other forms of payment mechanism entirely), then I will take my business else-where."
Translate mode off
Most companies probably despise having these types of items leaked. (and by most, I mean all)
But to think they would sit around and let him use their service even when he posted PayPal confidential information?
Basically they will probably say they made a mistake, but their goal has been completed. I doubt he will use PayPal for this type of service again.
... my own experience too, and many of my friends. PayPal is fine right up to the point where something goes wrong or you have a dispute with them. In which event you might as well find a convenient brick wall to bang your head against.
About time they were subject to far more rigorous regulation.
And the lesson is:
Keep large sums of money in your bank, not your paypal/neteller/moneybookers/poker account.
Withdraw, withdraw, withdraw again, while you still can.
You're joking right?
With the banking industry being a bunch of crooks as well, it is actually better that you keep your money somewhere else, like under your bed! They've effectively fixed the interest rates to punish savers who now get virtually no return while they themselves cream lots of money off of you!
Banks don't fix interest rates. States do. They also grant banks the license to print money.
Keep it under your bed and state will make you a pauper with its traditional inflationary policies Even more so than currently where you see your pension scheme and real bank account value go further buh-bye at each ministerial declaration.
Use that spare cash to buy some gold, and bury it on a Welsh mountain. That stops you having problems when the banknotes get withdrawn and irredeemable, as they do about every 10 years in the UK (some of my gold coins have Napoleon III on them, but they're still as good as cash !)
Mine's the one with the quarter Krugerrands sewn into the lining
why does he keep the money in paypals account?
it beggars belief more that he left so much money inside the paypal account instead of daily transferring the money to his REAL bank, paypal is not a bank, stop storing money in it, any money you receive, transfer immediately to your own bank account, withdraw it, don't leave it piling up in their account.
they are not a bank, stop treating them like it, they are basically a glorified western union, who also cannot be trusted with a hot chicken leg, nevermind money.
Search on Google for 'PayPal Sucks'
Read the horror stories. It makes you almost not want to use it ever again. If I was a seller I wouldn't !
If it's just £5k, why not keep it in cash -- you know, where they can't close your account and stuff.
Maybe he should just move it to an Icelandic bank..
About sums them up, my account was locked for "illegal" activities, I sold a monitor and pc parts and had £140 in there, according to paypal I had numerous outstanding accounts, which of course was a lie. I lost my money fighting them and gave up after getting no further forward and proving any other accounts werent mine. Never use them again, I lost the goods and the money.....law unto themselves, the sooner people realise this and stop using them the better.
Exactly why I run my account on 'empty' - they don't deserve the interest on my money.
I suspect the reason they coudn't provide justification for why the account was suspended was cos there wasn't any.
Donations can't be fraudulent sales now, can they.
Paypal behaviour is illegal.
Enough is enough! I have stopped doing any online transactions via paypal. I hope that enough others join me to send them an unmistakable signal that their policies are unacceptable! Ditto their owner, eBay... Time to create a prime-time competitor to eBay, IMO.
.. for the odd 50 or so that "just say no" there are sufficient idiots left (several million or so) that continue to keep their revenue stream stable, so I don't think they care much..
Just being realistic, really.
Let's be honest, I think we should finally accept that Cryptome's frozen account doesn't work. Sick of John Young whining. Is there no end to PayPal's face-saving measures? They can stick this in their pipe and smoke it as far as I'm concerned!!!
I accept payments for software on my site; and I have many ways of payment available.
Even if I received ~50 payments through the other options (it's a small hobbyist thing), I never got anything from paypal. And yes, people tried. Every time, it failed, paypal claiming that it was not granted by the client, which annoyed both me and the client because PayPal decided he can't pay.
I suggest you go over to Liberty Reserve; they at least know what they are doing, and their system has decent security, not like those fucktards at paypal who think that security means give anybody a right to juggle with the money randomly. I don't have time to speak with PayPal custom service IQ ~50 idiots.
Do not anger paypal.
Knowing what I know .. I feel real guilty using their services.
why I use moneybookers or even direct wire transfers. The less middleman the money needs to go the greater the chances of it getting to the intended recipient.
Anyone out there ...
... who can suggest any good alternatives to Paypal? I'm not sticking up for Paypal here, I'm actually asking (I use them at the moment and this has basically been the last straw).
"Paypal behaviour is illegal"
Where precisely is it illegal?
They are not a bank, therefore not regulated as a bank also they are domiciled in Liechtenstein, not the UK or US. So, who you gonna call?
Keep it low
I keep my paypal low as well. As soon as it gets near £50 I withdraw. Unfortunately it is too usefull to not use, just remember that it is not a bank and to make sure what you are selling includes the fees.
Sorry, Luxembourg not Liechtenstein.
Both begin with "L" though
Before reading this post I had already decided that I would never use PayPal - there are alternatives of course - but the article has set my attitude in concrete. Having already read reports of accounts being inexplicably frozen I took the view that I would be unwise to put my cash in the hands of such people. I've never had a problem with my bank, nor seen reports of such problems with them, and cannot fathom why PayPal feel free to deviate from this.
Theirs is the loss, and I hope that these vile creeps are reading this.
I may be being incredibly naive here but surely, in the UK at least, if an organisation is withholding your property/money/assets improperly you have the right to sue.
And the Small Claims Court would have allowed him to reclaim up to £5000 for a £50 cost I believe. Surely that is a better bet than just hoping they'd see reason?
Small Claims Track
You can only sue if they are a UK based business......thats why they moved to Luxembourg.
hmm interesting ...
On February 25, 2010 Cryptome published a url to a zip file called "paypal-spy.zip PayPal Spying Guide "
(which makes for interesting reading btw)
Not long after (6 March, 2010) their paypal account is frozen.
Yep, interesting, very interesting.
What did he expect
He has their "secret" documents on his site which "positions them" as a bit scary. Why did he think he could use thier service and not get bounced, nieive (cant spell) in the extreme?
PS im no fan of PayPal though they should be regulated by the FSA etc
So if PayPal suspend your account, who keeps the money?
I'm surprised that they are not regulated. I know it's almost impossible to regulate an online company, but if your operating in a global market, then you should at least have some sort of code of practice.
1 rule of thumb when it comes to money. If you cant go & punch someone in the face when it all goes wrong. Don't leave your money there.......
Pirate icon... cos PayPal are the new breed of pirates... Robbing the poor digitally, to give to rich.
eBay/PayPal: Dead Men Walking
PayPal and Bill Me Later are not a bank, are not regulated as banks are and yet offer banking-type services, services that would be more appropriately, efficiently, and competently carried out under the auspices of the banking community (via their credit card company partners).
The simple fact is that without the bankers’ knowledge of the entities involved in the transactions, PayPal, or any other non-bank provider, will always be handicapped. Non-bank providers can never guarantee anything for the buyer or seller because they simply don’t have the bankers’ knowledge of the entities involved.
PayPal is an unregulated, unprincipled, systemically dysfunctional, amateur organization (just like its ugly parent, eBay).
The head turkey at eBay, ‘Noise’ Donahoe, has talked of the possibility of offloading PayPal because he is just barely smart enough to know that when the major credit card companies do get off their butts and introduce a like card/terminal-less payments system to complement their credit card system, they will do it properly, and the dysfunctional PayPal will then sink like a stone—other than, possibly, on what is by then left of the Donahoe-ever-shrinking eBay marketplace. The banks may also let PayPal keep those ‘no hoper’ customers that the banks, who will always better ‘know’ their customers, might not likely allow a merchant-type facility.
If Donahoe has any brain at all he will be actively trying to sell PayPal to the banks to complement their credit card system; but I doubt the banks would want to lower their image any further by associating themselves with the likes of PayPal; not even for a peppercorn consideration would the banks touch such an incompetent amateur operation as PayPal, I suspect.
Does anyone then think that ‘all the banks’ are not watching this market segment with interest, and is it possible that PayPal (along with the upstart ‘Bill Me Later’) could be having a negative effect on their credit card business? Why then would ‘the banks’ not be considering a like system to complement their existing card systems? After all, every internet banking user is already set up to receive such a service directly, efficiently and securely, from their bank. The simple fact is that anything that PayPal can do ‘the banks’ can do so much better.
Do we then need to offer the banks and the major credit card companies another such monopoly-type situation? Ideally not. But, having said that, within the credit card system the individual banks do compete with each other on interest rates, etc.
Regardless, it would be nice to have a card/terminal-less system that worked efficiently and effectively—as does the banks’ credit card system. Regrettably (or thankfully, some say), PayPal does not have such a partnership with ‘all the banks’ and so PayPal can never offer that same effectiveness.
My only surprise is that ‘all the banks’, via their credit card partners, have not yet announced their own system. When they do, it will be bye, bye, PayPal—you most ugly of daughters. And, more importantly, we will then have a system that works effectively, just like our credit cards do!
In support of the above comment I offer an introduction to the full sad/ugly story of eBay/PayPal at
Give me £100k and I'll zap PayPal
No, seriously. The CC companies don't want to change their business model because they have effectively put the transaction liability on the clients and now treat the cost of fraud as a business expense, so they won't play and leave Paypal meddling away.
However, it is possible to seriously cut fraud if you know what you're doing, and I happen to know precisely how. With about 100k I can build this up in 3 months flat and take a serious chunk out of Paypal with users who turn real money - and almost no fraud risk (0% is unrealistic, but it's possible to completely avoid virus and fraudulent repudiation risks). The result would be a drastically lower overhead, and no need for new infrastructure other than the data centre,
Result: less risk AND less transaction overhead means lower cost per transaction. I'd have this well past break even in under a year. As a matter of fact, I think I ought to talk to someone about this...
I've closed my PayPal account
... in my own pathetic protest at their unacceptable behaviour.
When they stop being liars, cheats and thugs I might, one day, reconsider.
Until they can fuck off.
- Review 'Mommy got me an UltraVibe Pleasure 2000 for Xmas!' South Park: Stick of Truth
- The land of Milk and Sammy: Free music app touted by Samsung
- Privacy warriors lob sueball at Facebook buyout of WhatsApp
- The long war on 'DRAM price fixing' is over: Claim YOUR spoils now (It's worth a few beers)
- Dell thuds down low-cost lap workstation for
cheapfrugal creatives or engineers