Feeds

back to article Danes ditch Microsoft, take ODF road - at last

The Danish Parliament has agreed to ditch some Microsoft-based software in favour of the ODF standard from April next year. According to version2.dk and courtesy of politken.dk, parliamentary parties decided - after four years of deliberation - to use the Open Document Format in all Danish state office documents. “My ambition …

COMMENTS

This topic is closed for new posts.
Gates Horns

'We're interoperable'?

Word and Excel are rarely interoperable with other versions of the said software.

A few years ago our daughter came home with (it turned out) a very small Excel spreadsheet on a CD she needed to use for her homework I had to spend half an hour searching for converters between two office versions - a simple csv would have sufficed.

Very annoying.

Good on you Danes.

ttfn

14
0
WTF?

Excellent...

...but since when did Bhorat have an interest in Open Document Standards??

0
0
Silver badge

Compatability?

I thought the idea of office software was so you could easily write lots of documents, lots and lots, so many that no-one could ever read them and find out that you were a waste of space. That's what most managers seem to do.

3
0

Bien fait

That's all.

1
0
Thumb Up

UK, please follow suit

Governments, schools and colleges should NOT be pumping out documents in what, despite the allegedly-dubious opinion of ISO, is a "de-facto" proprietary format.

7
0
FAIL

macro?

yeah good job danes, fleece/tax the population while you figure out that there is zero macro support, and then fleece them again when you decide to revert to the superior format.

it's as if no one here recognises the standard politicians scam.

(charge them twice w/o doing a single thing)

1
17
Alert

marcos?

When I get sent a "document" in some MS format (or previously wordstar etc.), I am only expected to read it, not edit it. So all I have to do is run 'strings' on the file, and read the text. This has the added advantage of being able to read all the supposedly deleted paragraphs which linger in the document (most embarrassing security flaw). Usually, I can't be bothered.

Companies could 'standardize' on 2 or more office suites, and enable users to demand the standards.

1
0
Thumb Down

Macro?

ODF is a document format. Macros are about as relevant to that as PHP is to textfiles.

7
0
Grenade

re: macro?

* starts Open Office, goes to tools -> macros -> record macro *

Incidentally I can choose to write my macros in OO Basic, Bean Shell, Python or Javascript. So if your reason for choosing an office suite is its support for macros, OO wins hands down. Now, if by "zero macro support" you really mean "doesn't support VBA" then you're right but I'm not sure that's a bad thing.

5
0
Anonymous Coward

zomg macros!!

That's like saying you shouldn't put a sound card in your computer because it can't toast cheese sandwiches

It's not supposed to you stupid thicksickle.

0
0
Bronze badge

ISO OOXML

>> Danish regulation on mandatory standards [ECMA-376 or ISO/IEC DIS 29500] OOXML

Doesn't that rules out Microsoft as well, or have they managed to produce a version of MS Office that produces documents that comply to the ISO specification?

2
0
Grenade

The world's falling out of Ballmer's bottom

Tough times for Microsoft. The competition's hotting up and people are as mad as hell and aren't going to take it much longer.

It can't be long before a major Government finally bites the bullet and weans themselves off the treadmill paying Redmond for the same old shite in a different package. People don't need Office -- OK, granted that a *very* few power users may use 50% of the features, but the vast majority need to do very simple things.

When a major Government does switch over, others can't be far behind and the whole house of cards will come tumbling down into a mixed pile of metaphors.

6
0
Boffin

Exactement, monsieur!

Almost as long as MS-Office has been around, 80% plus of office tasks could have been done and still could be done by MS-Write and MS-Calc.

The OS/2 zealot from Down Under.

3
0
Thumb Up

Exactement, monsieur!

Nope : wordPAD would suffice, but to buy windooze for wordpad ??

0
0
Silver badge
Thumb Up

Fine, Denmark

Microsoft got a head start with their proprietary standards or as we like to say de facto standards.

This has lead to a lock in, of immense proportions, It is not easy to break that lock in because it is always easier to do nothing.

The interesting thing with open standards is there will never be any need to return to any proprietary "standards".

4
0
J 3
Pirate

From April next year?

Oh. So plenty of time for bribery then. Or for MS to introduce ODF in their products.

Nah, bribery is much more likely.

3
0
Happy

ODF in MS products

You can get plugins to make MS products read/write ODF files. I personally wouldn't use M$ Anything™ but am currently frustrated by the lack of an interoperable format. By me it would be fine if everybody uses ODF and their office application of choice.

0
0
Silver badge

Spot on

I totally agree. 14 months until switchover - who's going to bet against Ballmer making a hop to Denmark before the summer ?

0
0
Bronze badge
Linux

Is it something in the water?

What is it that makes Scandinavians twice as smart as anyone else?

7
1
FAIL

Danish

Haaaa.... yes, the Danish. They haven't even adopted the Euro. Open standards my ass.

1
4
WTF?

WTF...

Has non-adoption of the euro got to do with open standards?

1
0
Boffin

Euro

Not adopting the Euro was an intelligent decision too.

0
0
Happy

It's the cold, the cold

It is so damn cold there that they have to keep the brain cells working harder so as not to freeze up.

0
0
Go

OOXML is a standard M$ can not use

i4i owns patents on techniques that M$ OOXML use ... so ... under court order:

* M$ has to stop shipping products that use OOXML

* M$ has to patch existing software so that OOXML is not usable

* M$ has refused, to date, to pay for a license to the technology from i4i

* OOXML users bear the expense of removing functionality

* OOXML users bear the expense of converting or orphaning OOXML documents

So, once again, M$ has no open standards available in their products.

You reap what you sew.

1
0

Win for opposition

Actually, the government coalition (liberal+conservative), with science Minister Helge Sander as the most fervent proponent, backed having both ODF and OOXML as standard formats for public services, but the opposition with support from the right-wing party "Dansk Folkeparti" managed to negotiate a single-standard choice. But it was a pretty close thing.

I'm happy with the result, both because I prefer ODF over OOXML (which I think is a mastodont) and because having a single standard format is much easier than having two.

0
0
This topic is closed for new posts.