Western Digital has jumped into the enterprise-class hard drive market with a 10,000rpm, 300GB capacity drive. The WD S25 is built on WD's popular Velociraptor drive base, having a similar 2.5-inch form factor, spinning at 10K and with a capacity of up to 300GB. The capacity points are 150GB, with one platter, and 300GB with …
MTBF is usually the Mean Time Between Failures, not Mean Time Before Failure, so what is this 1.6 million hours? The Mean Time Before Failure, might appear to imply that this is the average lifetime of a drive before it fails. A figure of 1.6m hours would put that at a little over 182 hours. In fact that's a nonsense - physical hard drives have expected lifetimes far lower than MTBF (although generally they become obsolete before they wear out).
What MTBF is a statistical number of total operating hours for a given item. For instance, if you have 1,000 of these drives and operate them for a year (about 10 million operation hours) then an MTB Fof 1.6m hours, using the normal definition, would mean that you might expect an average of 6 failures a year. However, that only applies during the rated operational life of the disk - if they are only engineered to last for about 10 years, there will be a rapid increase in failure rate after that period (and, for some devices you will get early failures too - hence the need for burn-in on some critical systems).
The subject of MTBFs is widely misrepresented as being an indicator of the expected operational lifetime of an item. It isn't. Too often manufacturers are less than precise over the meaning of the terms that they use and leaving out the critical ones.
- Hi-torque tank engines: EXTREME car hacking with The Register
- Review What's MISSING on Amazon Fire Phone... and why it WON'T set the world alight
- Product round-up Trousers down for six of the best affordable Androids
- Antique Code Show World of Warcraft then and now: From Orcs and Humans to Warlords of Draenor
- Why did it take antivirus giants YEARS to drill into super-scary Regin? Symantec responds...