MP3 players sold in Europe could one day come with pre-set audio volume limits if plans proposed by a European Commissioner become official. Most MP3 players already allow users to set a maximum volume. However, an EC mandate would force manufacturers to automatically limit each player's volume before it could be sold in Europe …
Nanny state ...
I demand a politician intelligence minimum, preferably on a 6-month license after which they have to prove again they are competent enough to keep their jobs.
If they fail they cannot practice their jobs in the EU.
Seriously, it's nanny-state male bovine excrement like this that makes me believe the European (Dis)union is better off imitating the UN - a toothless, loudmouthed quango that cries, complains and wails a lot but has no real effect, than a proto-government.
Because they damn well fail at the latter.
You can take away my choice how loud I choose to listen to my music when you pry it from my cold, dead hands ....
If they want to do something partially possibly effective, they ought to ban all headphones that can't effectively direct that volume at the person wearing them.
I thought this already happened?
I remember diligently putting the US firmware on my iRiver H140 to overcome the sound cap so I could destroy my hearing properly and that was years ago.
A bit of googling comes up with plenty of comments like "Basically, don't get the European firmware because it restricts how loud the player can go, due to EU safety regulations."
What about really quiet files?
Are they planning to mandate that the player must scan the entire track before playing, then reset the maximum volume to prevent a damaging peak? Would this affect the volume of the whole track, or just the loud section?
And what about really quiet files where one needs to turn the volume up to its hissing, crackling highest in order to hear anything at all? You've all listened to one of those podcasts once or twice, I'm sure...
Definite health benefits aside, I fear that this idea is rather on the unworkable side...
If MP3 tracks at high volume can damage your hearing, maybe it is enough to replace them all with OGGs?
decibel is a ratio - not an absolute
100dB compared to what? anyway - different headphones have different output per microvolt applied - so they could limit to their "100dB" and I put some extra-sensitive phones on and get "110dB" - what's next then? proprietary headphone connectors? that'll go well because I've yet to buy a device with supplied phones that are worth putting near my ears.
LOUD MUSIC ON MY WALKMAN NEVER AFFECTED ME.
"...portable audio devices must not pump out music beyond 100dB"
100 dB what?
100 dB SPL @ 1 m would be loud enough for general consumer listening.
100 dB SPL @ 1 cm probably wouldn't be.
Please finish the sentence, so we can more accurately judge the stupidity level of this law.
ah. fuck. time to build an Altoild tin headphone amp
So if a limit was set and someone's hearing was damaged who would be responsible. If the nanny state wants to control everything, then they should take all the blame.
That said they should sod right off, we know loud music is bad. Loud music serves its purpose!
Paris coz she is pretty loud in more ways than one.
Just drives the loudness war...
If the players have limits music producers will just further overcompress their releases so that they sound 'louder' still thus destroying the sound completel and making them near impossible to listen to on a decent set-up.
The current volume limits are problem even right now if you're listening to older 'pre-remaster' material which is significantly quieter than the modern music the current limits were based around. In some cases the older material only hitting 50% peak amplitude, and has no excessive compression which is great for listening to on a proper setup, but near useless on portable players due to these silly limits.
I want louder mp3 players where I can turn the volume up to 11.
I need Loud music
As it drowns out the voices in my head
I remember that farce, I've got the Korean firmware on mine to get around that crap, however I rarely need to put the volume above 11 (out of 40) when listening through earphones because they're so good, however outputting to speakers etc. the unit is pretty quiet.
On that note, if they do limit volume output there are easy ways round it - decent earphones that don't take much input to be loud, or something like a Boostaroo headphone amp.
And they monitor volume by what mechanism?
After all I can switch the headphones for a pair of active PA speakers at 500W each..
100db (or dbA even) is useless without mentioning some distance...
This is ridiculous. But I believe that we should be accustomed with such idiot ideas from the EU.
The comment about different efficiency of different headphones is true! If they want to mandate a maximum sound level, they'll need fixed and non-swappable headphones. Then we will have to throw away our players if the headphone breaks.
Or we'll have to retro-fit a connector for headphones, then buy new headphones at the black market, and obviously crack the firmware to get a proper volume.
Headphones will become illegal, headphone connectors will be confiscated, loud players will be burned in public squares!
Royal National Institute for the Deaf
It was not so long ago that the RNID stopped people in the street who were wearing personal audio equipment and measured the volume of their headphones, I think more than 70% had the volume too loud and were going to effect their hearing, so that in later life they would be deaf or only partially hearing. Perhaps they should just come with a health warning.
I especially like
How the Royal National Whatever of Deaf People supports this. Apparently, they don't give a rat's ass about those who are merely hearing impaired.
Rubberized cutlery, for fear we plebs do ourselves an injury during mealtimes? Yes, it can be a massive irritation listening to other people's dodgy music spilling out of their inadequate earphones on public transport, but compare that against the horrid engine noise, or the clatter and rattle of ancient rolling stock.
However, I don't the the Europratts have our comfort at heart, so much as a desire to wrap us all in political cotton wool, lest we enjoy ourselves. Or something.
I want a Spinal Tap volume control
Most amps only go up to 10 but, you know, when you want that bit extra, you can crank it up to 11.
For those saying a distance is needed for sound measurement...
...we're talking MP3 players, where the normal listening mode is with little earbuds (packed with the player) put right into the ear. A sensible standard would be to have the music come out no louder than 100dB out of the standard-equipment earbuds at point blank.
@EU decibel cap? Nope
There never was an EU decibel cap, but there was a French cap, which meant that the manufacturers couldn't be arsed to produce two (or more) different models according to local markets in the EU so they simply produced one with the decibel cap on all of them.
Dont limit noise levels
just make it legal to kill people who have them on too loud... bingo problem sorted
Eurocrats: Do something useful...
...and ban the craptastic stock Apple headphones.
Every time there is someone annoying the feck out of an entire train carriage it's ALWAYS someone with a white pair of Apple headphones, most times hanging out of their ears because they're so uncomfortable.
Apple iPod/iPhone owners do yourself and your fellow travellers a favour and buy some fcking decent headphones - you wouldn't even need to spend much more than a tenner.
Yes I mean the comments. A lot of the commenters have not read the article properly. And a lot of them are laying down the law about decibels and sound level while obviously not knowing much about the subject.
First, ordinary consumers cannot measure sound level, so they cannot properly protect themselves. Hands up all those who think that it is OK to sell a product that can permanently damage people without them being aware of it. Consumer law is not adequate to protect people in this case because damage will take a long time to become apparent and it would usually be impossible to prove what exposure had deafened someone. But, you should be able to turn it up if you choose - which at the moment seems to be the proposal.
Those determined to deafen themselves will always find a way to do it, and this is not about trying to stop them. So shut up, go ahead and risk your hearing. By the time the damage has become apparent there might be a way to repair it - and then again there might not.
Second, earphone sound levels are measured according to an international standard ISO11904-2. Distance does not come into it.
Third, the vast majority of earphones suitable for MP3 players etc. have fairly similar sensitivity so in most cases choosing an ultra-sensitive model would not make a great deal of difference.
I can't tell whether your reading skills are limited or whether the frothing at the mouth after reading the title alone was so strong that it even blackened your vision, but the article does say that the user CAN override the preset limit.
So who cares.
If they did NOT allow the overriding, then I would complain too (not that Europe has any direct influence on me). But I can read. I think. Writing though...
Actually, it would be quite nice to have a law limiting SPL measured at a distance of 1m, then perhaps the train trip will become slightly more bearable. I propose the limit be set to "silence, measured at 1m". That would do nicely.
Might sound relatively unimportant until you actually find yourself sitting next to some brainless cretin blasting away his drum, bass and garage (is that the correct modern terminology, squire?), so loud through his ear buds that it's surprising his ears don't bleed. Annoying or what?
Consumers will still be able to override the safe default setting, she admitted.
then whats the point???
Fucking idiotic eurotwats.
And to think Blair will be sitting on his throne directing them all.
Be afraid, be very afraid...
This already annoys me
The model of DAP I have now is decidedly quieter than the model before it, and *that* one allegedly had a limiter (though I call BS on that). Good point about the US firmware though. Might look into that.
couldn't they shut up
blasted mobile phones playing gangsta rap at umpteen db on the bus. Cant they make a little dongle concerned parents can buy tghatll shut off the volume of noise making equipment laing out loud by spotty herberts on public transport? If they pump it into their brains, why I care?
We know it's bad for you, leave us alone. Is there a massive deficit in the NHS budget because of overspend in treating patients for ear damage after excessive volumes on mp3 players (incidentally, does this extend to a DVD player, Nintendo DS, PSP, or, lord forbid - the headphone jack on my amp?
@everyone going on about distance.
They are talking about portable audio players being played through headphones, SO NO DISTANCE AT ALL.
no no, let Darwinism run its course
But I am in favour of a dB cap on the noise *outside* of the earphone domain.
The Deaf Generation
Though I probably won't be around to see the worst of it, I've been predicting for years that the iPod generation are going to have more than their fair share of deaf people. Almost daily, I'll be sitting on the train on the way to work and there'll be at least one younger person with earbuds loud enough that I have identify the beat of what they're listening to, if not the actual track to which they're listening. If I can hear your earbuds from 10+ feet on a moving train while they're in your ears, you're listening to your music too loudly.
What's worse tho' is the nanny-staters wanting to step in to help those who're too stupid to figure out for themselves that protracted exposure to loud sounds = hearing impairment.
Is this legislating against stupidity?
Or just stupid legislation?
(Is there a difference...?!)
On the other hand...
I have to agree with the technical issues commented here.
However, what IS true is the deafness problem is going to be huge in 10/20 years time.
Of that there is no doubt.
LOUD ENOUGH FOR YOU FRENCHIE?
I'll decide how loud I have my music when using headphones, thank you very much.
So if it supports ogg vorbis, is it free from this retarded legislation?
well, 'tis a nice nanny state
100db = painful
110db = hearing loss
120db = able to tune out politicians
130db - blissfully dead
PISSED OFF WITH BRUSSELS
I, for one, am SERIOUSLY pissed off with Brussels telling me what I can and cannot do. The sooner this weak, good for nothing Labour government, who pander to Brussels every whim, are democratically 'booted out' of office, the sooner the better. 'Loony Labour' have RUINED this once, proud country.
PROUD BLUETITS ON HORSEBACK CLEVERLY REFLECTED YOU? WTF IS THAT SUPPOSED TO MEAN?
PUBLIC HEALTH BILLS ARE ESCALATING.
Why Are Helmets Mandatory For Motorcycle Users ?
Why Are Seat Belts Mandatory For Car Users ?
That's actually a really good idea. You'd get rid of so much annoyance, help stop people being irritating on the bus- removing another reason for people to complain about using the bus- and it wouldn't really affect those who wanted loud music.
I would make it less-than-old-diesel-bus-engine-noise at 1m, rather than silence. More realistic, and it lowers the amount of padding required.
- One HUNDRED FAMOUS LADIES exposed NUDE online
- Google flushes out users of old browsers by serving up CLUNKY, AGED version of search
- China: You, Microsoft. Office-Windows 'compatibility'. You have 20 days to explain
- GCHQ protesters stick it to British spooks ... by drinking urine
- Twitter: La la la, we have not heard of any NUDE JLaw, Upton SELFIES