Didn't have to be like that
While the employee might have done something bad / naughty / ill-advised, to just come out and blame him/her is a rather extreme point of view. A slight scraping off of the blame-culture veneer from this story shows an IT department with apparently no internal security, a very poor architecture with no defensive capability and maybe even a mass of interlinked systems (libraries to parking fines?) that should have no common points of failure.
Further, it implies that Ealing council doesn't have a DR plan - or at least not one that isn't crap and very likely no spare capacity to deal with exceptional circumstances, such as the ability to catch up processing due to earlier downtime.
One thing is correct in this story, if this had been a private company people would have been sacked: starting with the head of IT who allowed such an amateurish setup in the first place. There might even be a few directors having to answer embarrassing questions - regarding their legal responsibility to ensure an effective fail-over / fault-tolerant system. However, I'm sure that in a jobs-for-life council all that will happen is a few sarky memos, maybe a letter of reprimand to the lowest ranking official and an increase in council tax to recoup the losses.
If they're really on the ball, they might even take away this guy's USB stick - though I doubt they do anything as radical, professional or inconvenient as implementing an anti-virus regime. Assuming, of course, that wasn't just a handy scapegoat for something even worse.


