Websense has blocked two ISPs in Yemen from receiving updates after it emerged that they were using its filtering technology in a government-mandated censorship scheme. The OpenNet Initiative, a pressure group that identifies and documents Internet filtering and surveillance, found that YemenNet and TeleYemen/Y.Net were using …
If they can use a database system to block downloads, couldn't they just as easily direct it to a poisoned update?
Websense should be applauded for sticking to their principles in this age of breathless buck-chasing and particularly during an economic downturn.
Well done, Websense!
"Websense maintains a policy of not selling to 'governments or Internet Service Providers (ISPs) that are engaged in any sort of government-imposed censorship'."
...No sales to Australia, in future...?
Websense doing the right thing by who?
I like to think in terms of who has the most to gain from stopping censorship in the middle east. I'm guessing after the Iran example, that it's the West.
So while western governments are looking for better ways to censor the web in their own countries, they know it's to their advantage to stop censorship there.
I'm surprised states like Yemen rely on US products of this sort, I can't imagine the US relying on a Yemen based company providing products for government projects.
Meanwhile in the UK...
...you can go where you like, but Big Brother will watch your every step and rip the ass out of you at his leisure. Or simply deport you to foreign states with dubious judicial regimes so that you can rot in their cells without ever facing court.
And no, I do not mean McKinnon; I am talking about Andrew Symeou.
"I'm surprised states like Yemen rely on US products of this sort, I can't imagine the US relying on a Yemen based company providing products for government projects."
Hmm, good point - the Yemeni ISPs could've easily sourced equivalent or better products from the large Yemeni ICT industry in Silicon Wadi. Oh, wait...
With corporations its always about money.
Corporations are legal entities whose highest responsibility is to make money for their shareholders.
Someone sat down and compared what they would lose in sales to Yemen to their best guess of how many sales they would lose if public opinion turned against them.
The only thing that will make companies act as if they had morals is an informed consumer who is willing to express their approval or disapproval with their pocketbooks.
I for one and willing to boycott any company that facilitates this kind of censorship.
I never thought I'd say something positive about a company that made web-censorship software, but er, well, good for you Websense. I know on the occasions that a customer demands some censorship software on their network (despite my advising them against it), it will be Websense over SmartFilter.
Paris, because she's probably censored in Yemen so this icon might be all they can get.
- Google: Surge in pressure from govts to DELETE CHUNKS of the web
- Oi, bank manager. Only you've got my email address - where're these TROJANS coming from?
- Updated ARM server chip upstart Calxeda bites the dust in its quest for 64-bit glory
- Macbook webcams CAN spy on you - and you simply CAN'T TELL
- Feminist Software Foundation gets grumpy with GitHub … or does it?