An unusual object recently found on Mars by a NASA robot - said to be "the size of a large watermelon" and to weigh a "half ton or more" - is thought by boffins to provide proof that the Red Planet once had a much denser atmosphere than it does now. NASA close-in image of the 'Block Island' meteorite on Mars Robot rovers and …
A question... or two...
Half a ton of nickel/iron compound slamming into the surface of mars at some distant point in the past...?
Where's the crater?
How come it's just lying there on the surface when the rest of the this once-atmosphere covered world has been scoured away by the ravages of time?
Sod the weathering differences...
Who made the big footprint, complete with toes, on the right hand side of the rock?
Most watermelons I see in the market would probably come close to fitting in a one cubic foot box.
My sources say one cubic foot of granite weighs about 160 lbs, iron abut 460 lbs.
A very large cast iron watermelon might start to approach half a (short, 2000 lb) ton.
"help, help, I've fallen and i can't get up"
@ Steve Swann
'Where's the crater?'
Doesn't need to be one; meteorites don't always arrive near vertically; sometimes they skip across the atmosphere like a stone over a pond, gradually descending at a very low angle and coming to rest at relatively low speed.
Actually, when I first saw the images this meteorite reminded me of the Hoba West meteorite in Namibia, which at 60 tonnes + is the largest single meteorite found on Earth and which is also sans crater.
smashed to bits
isn't it likely that the actual impactor DID smash to bits, and this is just one of the bits that got thrown clear of the original impact site ?
Sleepy, quite clearly that is yet more evidence of Big Foot. Obviously the Big Foot tribe of sasquatch built the face of Mars, and NASA are doing another cover-up.
Well the Hoaglands of this world might zero in on that, but think about it for a moment: a lump of iron soft enough for someone to make a visible footprint in would have to be hot enough to turn that foot to so much chared long pork in the time it took to make the print.
The one with the blacksmith's apron please.
This meteor bounced off Earth's atmosphere where it melted a bit, and shot off in the direction of Mars.
Re: Question or two
Good questions, but there's no mistery. Even weighing half a ton may not cause a significant crater if the atmosphere they're hinting at was thick enough. But more importantly, any crater would have been small (being metallic and whole, it didn't explode on impact so no major hole) and easy for the Martian weather to erode. The rock lies exposed because over long periods of time erosion would have removed the surrounding softer rock, and left the much tougher metal behind. It is also possible that flowing water may have moved the meteorite from its original impact site to where it sits today.
This is not the first meteorite that the rovers have found. There was a smaller one - also metallic - found a few years back near one of the landing sites, and quite near a heat shield that had been shed.
this is just a fragment of the real meteor which hit, vapourising Martian-kind and itself 50 million years ago. Bit's flew off the low density planet and smahed into ours.
And we all know what happened 50 million years ago....
That's the point... a thick atmosphere would slow the bugger down to a few hundred km/h. It could have easily skipped and bumped along the surface if it came in shallow. The evidence from that would soon be wiped out by the Martian sands.
Face of the Madonna
If you look very closely you can see the face of the Madonna !!
...is there a Martian eBay I wonder?
Would it not be just as likely that the lack of a crater is due to the surface being significantly different rather than, or as well as, the atmosphere? Could it not have landed on water or ice which has since gone? This would account for a lack of a crater. After all, wasn't the location for the lander's mission chosen due to the high likelihood of it being an area that once had standing water?
The object looks quite irregular for something that's been slowed significantly by an atmosphere. If it had been slowed enough to not leave a crater, would it not be more rounded and melted?
The whole "meteoric" origin theory is riddled with more holes than the object itself, which is obviously the wadded-up wreckage of the Beagle-2. You can just make out the BS Kit mark on the lower right underside.
The is the reason we need to go there
The mysteries of that rock would be solved in a tiny fraction of the time it'll take that robot, if an astronaut paid a visit.
Cleaver people or just back seat geeks?
Its nice to see so many proffesors and other highly qualified scientists here. But i have to wonder why you lot aren´t working for ESA or NASA with your extencive knowlage of space, mars and so on.
Spirit, remains bogged in a sand trap
Not going to make the Ryder Cup team this year, then?
People need to be there or...
... a we need a rover that can overturn such an object, in order to view the underside...
Imagine the impact if, overleaf, there were unusual symbols/'alien writings' or even a "This side UP" notice...
'Cleavers', 'Proffesors' and 'extencive knowlage'?
Please tell me you're taking the p*ss...
Don't forget 'knowlage'
we dunt need no educashun.
- Vid Hubble 'scope snaps 200,000-ton chunky crumble conundrum
- Bugger the jetpack, where's my 21st-century Psion?
- Google offers up its own Googlers in cloud channel chumship trawl
- Windows 8.1 Update 1 spewed online a MONTH early – by Microsoft
- Interview Global Warming IS REAL, argues sceptic mathematician - it just isn't THERMAGEDDON