She had a hole in one.

*ba dum tish*

With a spelling like "Kayti" I'm surprised she wasn't on page 3.

When asked about her handicap, the answer should have been "Stupidity".

... always study your cover story *properly* before you set out!

See your point, they always inflate, but if it was pure she was carrying, they have seriously underestimated the value

"i would love to know where plod gets these figures from."

Same way they get all their stats. Guess, double it, round it up to the nearest ten then add 3

Giving a real figure of between 38 and 40k

Simple when you know how.

Little maths lesson for you here, 2kg glucose + 1kg cocaine = 3,000 wraps of bolivian @ £50 = £150,000 so the police have underestimated.

That is of course after it has been cut from 80-100% purity to between 2-30%.

If you were to deal with it all yourself, sell it in small bits at street prices, at street purity, I don't think you'd have much trouble pulling in 80k.

If you buy it down the pub off the local sociopath you should expect to get ripped off with 20-30% purity. It is intended for pissed idiots who'd probably just become psychotic if they had anything decent. If you want some good enough to wash up(say) then "pub charlie" is a waste of time & money.

As far as the golf club story goes - just shows how good general knowledge can get you by in an emergency.

Mine's the one with the bottle of ammonia & a blowtorch in the pocket

Shouldn't the contents of your pocket be a knife, a fork, a bottle and a cork?

Maybe it was some good shit man!

Paris cos she has some nice lines..

...the knowledge of crack cocaine valuing and such on here. I had no idea so many tech-heads are also crack-heads. Whatever gets you guys through the day I suppose!

.

Still, I think its not all that hard to imagine some dumb crack-whore charlie trafficker breaking down on even basic sporting knowledge to the customs guys. I dread to think how many kilos of rock would make it into the country if they weren't all dumb as fuck.

...she could comment she was bringing the golf clubs to her brother, hubby, neighbor, whatever, and she could get away with it. Maybe she tested the "product" one too many times before packing...

...by "product" I mean both the coke's quality or the club's swing at her own head. Pick one.

What a mule...

"Isn't that the wrong word? Legitimate?"

No, it's a perfectly valid word, given the circumstances. There was no guy around, thus she couldn't be a caddy, and she isn't a lesbian. Thus, she had no legitimate reason to be in the possession of golfing equipment.

<Paranoid rant>

What? How did you know? Are you wired man? Are you? Are you? I think I heard the cops. Did you hear something? Shhhhh, put the shit away man. I think theres someone outside. No? Give me the pipe man. I need a hit AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHhhhhhhh!!!!111

</Paranoid rant>

On a side though I have gone sking a few times in the past and TBH I hated how paranoid I got :P

/AC Incase anyone I know reads this.

FAIL to the budding criminal for the idiocy. I have never played gold or even remotely approaches a course, and I still know what 'handicap', 'fairway' etyc mean. Good cop by the border police. I was however struck by this phrase: "it was clear that she was totally unfamiliar with the game and she had no legitimate reason for travelling with the sports equipment."

Surely what he should mean is "she had no logical reason". Saying she did not have a "legitimate reason for travelling with the sports equipment." implies that it is illegal to carry any sports equipment unless you're an expert at using it.