More photos here #
Posted Sunday 12th July 2009 16:43 GMT
http://spaceflightnow.com/shuttle/sts127/090711lightning/
Posted Sunday 12th July 2009 16:43 GMT
http://spaceflightnow.com/shuttle/sts127/090711lightning/
Posted Sunday 12th July 2009 16:43 GMT
However, take a shuftie at this:
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/discoveries/2009-02-22-lightning-cameras_N.htm.* There's more to this than meets the eye....
I remember at Nokia my manager told me the worst failure times for IC's etc. were in winter - Finnish dry air promoted static - but the failures were not immediate, but occured later under stress/testing. Days or weeks later.
Sorry, but I'd be worried. As I'm a Rocket Scientist (limited, admittedly: on Nov.5 - I know how to light the bugger) I feel our Nasa Overlords should heed my warning, unless they had very high speed cameras.
*Please, I beseech you, don't click on the "Interactive Graphic" link. The "Drag scrubber to animate" cost me yet another bloody keyboard...
Posted Sunday 12th July 2009 19:56 GMT
"Finnish dry air promoted static"
That's all well and good and everything, but lightning is not static... It moves fairly quickly (faster that the speed of sound, hence the sonic boom).
What you should be more worried about (and I'm sure NASA will check this) is the induced electric current from using the tower as a wire.
There's also the magnetic field from the high current going through said tower.
Posted Monday 13th July 2009 09:50 GMT
strictly speaking, the lightning itself doesn't cause a sonic boom - it's essentially mass and weightless afterall.
The sonic boom is caused by the expansion shockwaves of superheated gas (aka thunder) created as a gazillion volts pass through it.
Posted Monday 13th July 2009 12:03 GMT
"Please, I beseech you, don't click on the "Interactive Graphic" link. The "Drag scrubber to animate" cost me yet another bloody keyboard..."
Shame for you - it worked great for me, and I didn't know that a bolt goes from the ground UP!
Posted Tuesday 14th July 2009 10:33 GMT
Actually, I meant the phrase "drag scrubber to animate" made me snort! "Scrubber in English is a 'loose woman' - ho, tart, whatever".
Yep 95% of lightning goes up. That's (IIRC) a negative strike. I seem to remember that a positive strike can happen*, which is a helluvalot more powerful. That'll certainly make your eyes water...
Happened to an American friend of mine years ago. He was walking in the Rockies - I think - and suddenly noticed the pebbles moving. Fortunately he knew what to do, and hit the deck. Struck a few metres away, nice crater.
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightning#Positive_lightning