Sales of OLED TVs will skyrocket between now and 2016. The bad news for OLED watchers is that a compound annual growth rate of 140 per cent still leaves the technology behind plasma let alone LCD. The growth forecast comes from market watcher DisplaySearch, which today predicted that, come 2016, OLED TVs will yield revenues …
Thinking of similar product evolutions, personal digital cameras took a while to surpass film-based cameras, colour TVs took a while to out-sell black-and-white sets.
However, it'll be interesting to see if other technologies touted for displays make it out before OLEDs start to dominate LCDs.
Perhaps the biggest sector for OLEDs, of course, is the mobile market where power consumption is actually more of an issue.
What's that Billy?
Jesus H Fucking CHRIST!
People get paid to point out the obvious? Had they spent more than a week in even the most basic business school they would have seen how ANY NEW PRODUCT evolves.
Early adopters (innovaters, trendsetters) when the product is new and expensive, economies of scale (assuming it's applicable) brings price down and the plateau of "normal" purchasers set in, then finally the laggards as it tails off.
OLED is better than LCD and Plasma, were it not to start selling more I'd be fucking astounded.
And sell MORE only AFTER selling some.. that's fucking brilliant, give that man a medal!
I'm off to go scrape the remainders of my brain out into the toilet pan so I can enter a fruitful career as a market forecaster or consultant.
Who's going to be digging this report up in 2016 to see if it's right?
LCD, CRT, OLED
I have just bought a replacement 26" CRT after my last one died, ok it only cost me £10 so didn't owe me anything.
I have spent a lot of time watching LCD tv's in the likes of Curries, Dixons, Richer Sounds and Sony shops and am still not impressed with the quality of SD images. Ok HD and animation/games looks superb but normal tv looks awful.
OLED on the otherhand is amazing. I saw a small OLED tv in a Sony shop and was blown away by the quality and clarity.
I am just hoping that I can keep on buying cheap CRT's until the price of LCD's either comes down to less that a small 2nd hand car or the quality improves enough for me to open up my misers wallet as I don't think I can wait long enough for OLED to become cheap.
OLEDs are crap.
They fail after a far too short time to be any use.
Time will tell...
I've been working in broadcast for ~20 years, and worked with the first ever HD systems from Sony. Nothing I've seen has stood up to those original HD CRT based sets - until I saw the XEL-1. I still won't bother with plasma or LCD (although the new Samsung LED backlit sets are pretty good), and I still have a 22" Ferguson CRT that kicks the crap out of most displays I've seen.
If they can solve the lifespan issues, and get the price right, OLED is the only thing I've seen that I'd want in my front room. Of course, if it's a heavily compressed SD signal being badly upscaled to an HD display then all bets are off anyhow ;-)
Product price and power price
OLEDs will be monumentally expensive in the beginning, there's no doubt about that. But remember how expensive (and small) plasma televisions were when they first came out? And let's not pretend that LCD was cheap, either. One thing I'm having a hard time understanding is the power usage of plasma and LCD (which were claimed to be energy-efficient compared to CRT). It seems that a lot of companies (I'm looking at you, Samsung) don't even list the power usage in their spec sheets. Those that do aren't exactly power-friendly. Take the Mitsibishi LT-52246 52-inch LCD TV, for example, which is listed at 330W. Compare that with Mitsubishi's L65-A90 65-inch LaserVue TV which is listed at 135W, or the Mitsubishi WD-65737(65-inch) or WD-82737 (82-inch) DLP projection TVs which are both listed at 218W. Hopefully OLED will be much less power-hungry than plasma or LCD, similar to (or better than) the LaserVue.
- IT bloke publishes comprehensive maps of CALL CENTRE menu HELL
- Analysis Who is the mystery sixth member of LulzSec?
- Comment Congress: It's not the Glass that's scary - It's the GOOGLE
- Analysis Hey, Teflon Ballmer. Look, isn't it time? You know, time to quit?
- Murdoch Facebook gloat: You're like my $580m, 'CRAPPY' MySpace