In a real-time system ... #
Posted Thursday 25th June 2009 23:41 GMT
150 ms is an infinity of latency. It all adds up, y'know!
Posted Thursday 25th June 2009 21:02 GMT
how wonderful to read an article about networking and not see "Cisco" mentioned once.
Not that I have anything against Cisco, but it is most certainly not a Cisco-only world, despite what your network manager would tell you...
Posted Thursday 25th June 2009 23:41 GMT
150 ms is an infinity of latency. It all adds up, y'know!
Posted Thursday 25th June 2009 23:41 GMT
For god's sake, it's only been a few years since the last meltdown caused by automated trading systems running away in a positive feedback spiral. Anyone who knows anything about economics and about cybernetic control mechanisms would see in an instant that a bit of packet delay is a *good* thing; it amounts to putting some damping on the feedback loop.
Posted Friday 26th June 2009 09:38 GMT
Err, no. When you're running big arbitrage positions it's the delay that causes the problems.
As for "a meltdown caused by automated trading systems running away in a positive feedback spiral" I think you'll find that shit coding and stupidity cause problems wherever they surface but it doesn't mean that things shouldn't advance, just that people should take more care over what they do.
Posted Friday 26th June 2009 09:46 GMT
Sure, you go ahead and have some dampening latency, and I'll arbitrage you out of business.
Posted Friday 26th June 2009 09:46 GMT
They're talking microseconds not milliseconds so it's actually only a thousandth of an infinity.
Posted Friday 26th June 2009 09:46 GMT
A 150 ms may be a lot in a real time system. But we're talking about 150uS only a factor of a thousand faster.