The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Blade Runner house yours for $15m

Fans of Blade Runner with very, very deep pockets are directed to Frank Lloyd Wright's 1924 Ennis House, which featured in the movie and is up for grabs for a modest $15m. The Ennis House. Pic: The Ennis House Foundation The last of the architect's four "Textile Block" abodes, the 6,000-square-foot Mayan-inspired pad was built …

This topic is closed for new posts.
Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

Genius...

Falling Water had structural issues as well didn't it?

Thumb Down

Ugly

Designed by a blind architect like all modernist rubbish!

Anonymous Coward
Coat

His homes might be a work of art

but it's a pity he didn't attend the 'how to build a house structually' class.

Mine's the one with a slide-rule in it...

Happy

Rain damage,

for the authentic blade runner experience

The myth of the architect

Yet another "genius" architect who knew nothing about his materials. As a piece of failed design it should be pulled down. You could rebuild it properly 5 times over for that money.

@JonB re. Genius....

"Falling Water had structural issues as well didn't it?"

Yes, but that is not the architect's fault. It is never the architect's fault. It is the fault of philistine builders, who use imperfect material and techniques; and ignorant occupiers who fail to understand the special maintenance requirements of such wonderful designs.

Thumb Down

Not a location

As I remember they used castings from the wall reliefs on the soundstage set of Deckard's apartment, they didn't film in the house itself.

The Thirteenth Floor

In the 1999 film The Thirteenth Floor (pretty good underrated sci-fi if you ask me), the main character's apartment looks like Deckard's from BR, the unique patterned tiles being the giveaway.

@JonB

'Falling Water had structural issues as well didn't it?'

Yup, some of the reinforcement was left out of the concrete cantilevers and they became deformed. It was also unbelievably noisy until double-glazed. FLW - awesome architect, but never buy a flat roof from him.

Oh and the mighty Reg left out 'The Rocketeer' from the house's list of guest appearances.

Now if only I had a spare $15m lying around.

Paris Hilton

Genius Architect not necessarily = engineer...

There's a FLW home (the May house) in my home town (city). Way ahead of its time and wonderful to look at, but structurally not up to par. After much reinforcing and restoration it is a joy to tour the home. Many times genious' aren't bothered by the details (like structural engineering), unfortunately.

Paris, 'cause she's better looking than the other icons.

@ Haku

That's because TTF was filmed there too. It's also been used in: Predator 2; Black Rain; Rush Hour; and Karate Kid Part III.

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

Leaking Water

Wikipedia claims a structural engineering consultants report was buried in the walls, I'd love it to be true but that sounds extreme even for Lloyd Wright.

A triumph of form over function. I actually really like Falling Water (actually most of his output) but I wouldn't want to own any of it.

one other movie

It was also the house used for exteriors in "the house on haunted hill" The Vincent Price one.

@frank ly

I hope your comment is sarcastic. My father worked in the construction industry for forty years, and had nothing good to say about architects. The civil engineers did the real work, taking totally impractical sketches from architects and trying to make them buildable. It's an interesting comparison to software engineering, where managers make the same kind of impractical design decisions that should be left to qualified system architects.

Where I'd like to live

Just opposite Falling Water, to see the house AND the water. Then I could have the best view and no damp.

Coat

I'll take it

I just need your bank account number and sort code and i will transfer the monies immediately

Alert

Re: Falling Water

I recently read[1] that FLW made the mistake of telling his client that he had the design for Falling Water "done" -- as in, he'd thought it all through and was satisfied that it would all work together. The client assumed that "done" meant "ready to go" and told Wright that he was in Milwaukee on business and would drive over to Wright's Oak Park home and pick up the drawings. So FLW had to whip up a set of design (if not actual construction) blueprints in about three hours. Which would go a ways towards explaining why the actual engineering details were a bit...sparse.

[1] _Frank Lloyd Wright Revealed_, IIRC

Anonymous Coward
Flame

Not the worst looking building

I have to see this building everyday at work:

http://www.empsfm.org/aboutEMPSFM/index.asp?categoryID=157

At least they are putting alll the atrocities to good desgn in one place... Next to the 'Space needle' and serviced by the Seattle MonoFail...

I just wish Paul Allen had more sense than to sign off on this expense.

Coat

"...it still needs an estimated $5-7m of TLC to restore it to its original glory."

A little HGTV and DIY probably wouldn't hurt either.

Anonymous Coward
Happy

I know I'm just a philistine

but it really really looks like it's made out of lego to me. He'd never get a job at Barrat homes

Paris Hilton

"My Father Designed homes to be lived in"

Obviously he wasn't designing homes to be structurally sound.

Paris becasue like all FLW's creations, beautiful to look at, but dosn't work outside parties

Anonymous Coward
Thumb Down

FLW

Classic case: Emperor's new clothes syndrome!

If it can't stand on its own . . .

then it deserves to crumble.

We're talking about a construction that is less than 50 years old, right ? It's not a medieval castle, or some architectural wonder of the first millennium that deserves millions to be spend on its restoration and maintenance.

This is a building that was conceived and built with modern techniques, modern tools and modern materials. If it can't stand alone for a hundred years without continuous and expensive treatment, then it should most definitely die.

A tribute website can be made, with lots of pics and, at some point, a 3-D tour. That will be more than this thing deserves anyway.

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

BIG surprise

Never EVER let a Ingeneer design a building and never EVER let a designer ingeneer a building.. Waite a minute... Hmm i guess thats why we have designers and ingeneers.

Coat

twin peaks

intrigued by the comment about it being in Twin Peaks and wondered which bit it was ... quick bit of googling revealed that it wasn't just in TP ... it was the location for "invitiation to love" - the TV soap which was in TP!

Mines the anorak

Joke

Is it just me?

Or does that photo not make it look like it's built from Lego>

Alert

Wow! Our HRH prince of Wales comments!

"ugly rubbish like all modernist buildings."

Hahahaha.

IT Angle

Not all architects...

... are hopeless engineers. Visit the Gaudi apartment buildings in Barcelona sometime to see a beautiful /and/ functional building thats still a joy to live in 100 years later.

I quite agree however with the comment about it being pretty shabby that a less-than-50-years-old building made with modern techniques takes more looking after than a 1000 year old castle. But then FLW was an artist, not a practical person.

Paris Hilton

Genius Architect not necessarily = engineer, part 2

Tis a thing of beauty that brings much pain...

I too live down the street from a FLW house. Most everyone who lived there over the last 50+ years has complained bitterly about the maintenance, the cold, the dampness, the roof leaks, etc, etc. A few years ago it was re-hab'd, again, and sold for housing bubble big $$. As a result, the property taxes in the neighborhood skyrocketed (most of the houses in said neighborhood were old and very modest), thus spreading the misery...

This topic is closed for new posts.