So now "sexual deviancy" is a risk? As in a dangerous thing that should be limited and mitigated, rather than just a difference, a deviation from the norm? So some people are into kinky shit (literally in some cases)- why's that wrong? Okay, you may not want to take part in it- so don't. Same as you might not like wearing neon pink at a funeral- it's a deviation from the norm, some people probably find it offensive. But it's pretty much harmless and in no way detracts from your ability to mourn or wear black while doing it (except for this time, when you're wearing neon pink).
And giving someone a release for their pent-up tension is a dangerous thing? An analogy- which would you rather was pointed at your eye- a coiled up spring ready to burst free of its confines in a pretty much unpredictable way, or an unstressed spring?
The unstressed spring is still dangerous, but it's predictable and controllable, unlike the compressed spring which could fly off in any direction.
People with porn are less likely to commit sexual offences than those without porn but with similar urges.
On their third point, I've found that during intimate relationships it's been able to give me a better insight into things to try. And so far it's not let me down!
And which "rape myth" is this? The one about all intercourse being rape, or the one about every man being born with a genetic imperative to rape?
Also, the 'net filter is a ridiculous idea as it would be used to block out legitimate discussion and you'd end up getting rid of information on various things- can you imagine if the Vatican got a hold of this? "Nope, Contraceptives are wrong. Ban all mention of them".
Nope, the best 'net filter there is is that there are so many contradictory views on the Internet that none of them can gain precedence over another without a pretty impressive movement- see Annonymous / Scientology.
As for the icon, I need glasses if I'm going to see well enough to shave my palms...