A Royal Navy warship may have come within seconds of opening fire on Unidentified Flying Objects above Merseyside, possibly narrowly avoiding the precipitation of an interstellar war and the extirpation of humanity by testy aliens. Reports have it that the UFOs - speculated to have been visiting spacecraft from beyond the solar …
Its months away from being finished thats why there is not all the weapons yet!
I know you love the sceptics angle Lewis but really you could have made more clear that actually the ship is quite a few months away from deployment and therefore we shouldn't expect to be all ready and loaded to go.
Do you love your poo poo of the Telegraph article, sometimes the papers/internet just make stuff up which is just nonsense which irks me.
There were some stories about the RN running Windows weren't there?
The combination of crap pre-war AA guns and crap post-war OS makes me glad I've left the UK
So even less well-equipped for the job than Thunderchild then, but at least we have swine flu to fall back on....
Does this also explain the RNs impotence in the face of lightly armed Iranian dingies?
I thought there was plenty enough cannon-fodder
in the area between South Liverpool and Southport without having to go to the expense of firing off expensive stuff like flares. You want proof? Just flick a lit match at any polyester tracksuit...
Lewis gets it wrong, again!
Wow, Lewis, you didn't even read what you wrote!
"The guns on the ships are powered by radar,"
Kryten turrets are not powered by radar!
A proper journalist would have done some basic research, and reported which previously unreported, radar powered weapons system was almost used.
If nothing else I learned what scouse is.
UFO SIGHTINGS - SOUTHPORT
Interesting stuff and we have just had in reports at Southport of sightings over the sea.
Pat Regan - Founder of North West UFO Research
oh, for the love of...
...a billion £ destroyer, with most of it's primary weapons from the "oooh, it's shiny" category not fitted????
May as well put a sign up saying "We're british, we're skint and we're shit!"
I for one.....
Welcome our alien scouse overlords!
"A Royal Navy warship may have come within seconds of opening fire on Unidentified Flying Objects above Merseyside"
ey, ey, ey...cehm down, cehm down
Brown must be relieved of duty; these crackbrained plans of his to save the regime are getting more and more dangerous every day. Starting a fight with a transgalactic civilisation is _NOT_ the way to distract the taxpayer.
Yeesht... gotta love the UKGov, they'll save banks, fork out millions to businesses and yet when it comes to defence.. they hand out pea shooters.
Hate to think what they'll fit on the new Astute class Submarines.. Maybe a giant pink feather...
But I for one welcome out flare impersonating, alien visiting overlords... After the almighty Hypno-toad of course!
must have been the same UFOs that painted a large jellyfish on a barley field in Oxfordshire!
Friday all ready?
Time for Playmobile?
orange, ball-shaped UFOs
That would be the invaders described in John Wyndham 's "The Kraken Wakes".
You can easily tell if it's true - you'll start hearing stories about the ice caps melting and sea level rising.
UFO's over Merseyside?
Must be stolen hub caps.
Airport vs "real" radars
My understanding is that (civilian) airport radars are really only powerful enough to trigger transponders in aircraft, and cannot "skin paint" or get reflections from aircraft with their transponders turned off, which would explain the variance between the airport's and HMS Daring's radar logs.
Civilian RADAR doesn't work quite like that...
Civilan RADAR systems, especially at international airports, actually rely on a plane's transponder. Military systems are the ones that physically send out RADAR waves that bounce back. That's how they can track planes that TURN OFF THEIR TRANSPONDER.
... Playmobil reconstruction?
The cost of business doing you
The cost for the licenses for Windows for Warships must have been staggering.
Ball-shaped object over water?
Hm... was it Merseyside and not Lithuania? Just asking, because I was just watching The Prisoner, and there's evil blobs coming out of the water there... Would explain it all.
I saw something similar
I'm from Liverpool and I saw something similar in description to that a couple of years ago. they must be repeat visitors
@Mark re. Lewis gets it wrong, again!
I'd have thought that the guns were in fact powered by high pressure hydraulic lines or by some beefy electric motors.
(The one with 'Annoying Pedant' written on the back)
To quote Star Trek Generations.
"The Phalanx guns? Umm, they won't be installed until Tuesday."
Excuse me - no one lets off military flares in a densely populated area?
I live next to sandhurst military academy and when night ops are on they send up para flares
all the time - one eveyr minute or so - these often end up in peolpes back gardens or on the local football field when we take the dogs out for a walk in the morning.
Ok the flares are let off in woodland but this is right next to two council estates and
some posh estates - and we all get burnt out chute flares!
The mersey flares could be heat flares with a line of chaff to present both a heat and radar signature. *Thinks* Having the chaff in the form of a "baloon" could be an atempt to present a specific radar sig after all UK boffins still come up with some wacky but workable ideas.
And you did say the ship was at dock - if they were planning on (re)fitting the guns would they not want to test (say) the radar for tracking integration - even if the guns are still virtual stubs...
@ ac 19:32
I prefer the lions led by scoundrels approach myself :-)
We're British, almost always skint, shovelled lots of s**t and that is why we are great.
Re: Lewis gets it wrong, again!
Mark, please read the article then comment you retard! Lewis was merely quoting another article (written by the Telegraph) before verbally anihalating it.
Lewis, please keep these articles coming its always comfoting to read how impotent our military actually is regardless of the endless propoganda thrown at us "they wouldnt understand" civvies by the top brass.
Unfortunately I had the misfortune of using the cadet version of the SA80 (bolt action) during school and I tended to find it more effective if I just picked the bullets up and overarm lobbed them down the range! I can only hope the full blown version is somewhat better, but from what I hear from friends now in the forces I doubt it.
I guess the Royal Navy ain't what it used to be
In other reports the Royal Navy has reported high accuracy with the SB-7 spitball cannon. The Vice Admiral of the Ex-checker has reported that...
I'm pretty sure that civilian air radar is capable of detecting and showing real targets as well as transponders [well that was the case when I last worked with radar systems 20+ years ago]. Same deal with marine radar.
However the system can be set so be selective as to what it shows ("raw return" - ie what signal gets received, "doppler only" - ie. only moving signals and ignore reflections from buildings etc, transponder - ie. decoded transponder data that shows up as a symbol).
Raw transponder data looks like a line of "blips" and lots of transponders going off, as you get with air traffic control for a busy airspace, would just look like a screen full of tracer fire. Generally air traffic control terminals are set to not show anything except for translated transponder symbols.
Orange blobs in Liverpool?
You can see them every weekend down Mathew Street, usually with bad bleach jobs.
The floating orange balls were actually seen in navy simulation exercises. They were using the Crysis Editor.
Don't you realize that the aliens obviously have the tech to disguise their ships as signal flares???
Not to mention their soldiers are disguised as discarded rubbish? We're surrounded!!!
Having actually been a test engineer in the past though, they may have been using camera equipment to track the plane (or just the flares) visually, while it dropped the flares as it was being filmed? Maybe? I dunno, I might be crazy. I know when things with any kind of technical sophistication are involved, the tests created are completely up to the imaginations of the people who are working with/on it. There's almost always something worth seeing from the test results that wasn't expected, or needs to be verified through multiple kinds of observation, so the more you add to the test to observe, the better.
One thing I would use the radar/flare test for is to see if long range visible light systems can track in synch with radars when it comes to range finding and doppler effects from objects in motion, or to calibrate a visible-light based system (and/or infrared) with the radar system, since the flares literally cover at least those three spectrum.
Why would one do this in public? It's (probably) not involving secret tech, and the land based part of the test probably wanted to show off to family or just thought it would be cooler :) I'd show up to watch if I had nothing better to do. And everyone loves pyrotechnics ;P mmmm, fire.
Of course it could be the government getting us used to weird things happening so that when the true alien overlords do finally show up soon, by the time we realize it isn't a hoax we'll be easy pickings. Of course. Or it could be....
Mine's the one that says, "My tinfoil hat is my other pants"
Yeah, repeat visitors. You keep telling yourself that.
I reckon they just got lost following the M6 and hit the M62 instead of the M55. I can't imagine anyone intentionally visiting Liverpool twice.
Dont know where you get the idea that the Kryten gun is a WWII design. its actually based on the abbot from the 60's. but only called the Kryten after a redesign in the 80's.
after all WWII guns had manned turrets, this ones automated.
Perhaps if you did some research Lewis you would find out where the Phalanx mountings that are going to be fitted are currently (or have until recently) operating. Far from "cannibalising" them, they will be refurbished and brought up to the latest standard.
Or perhaps we should just throw the old ones away, the ones that are perfectly functional with a few years more life in them, and buy a load brand mountings: that would be a great use of taxpayers money.
Lewis I'm sick of your anti Navy, anti RAF, anti Army, anti MOD rants purporting to be reality. "Never let the truth get in the way of a good story", I bet you've heard that a few times in your life. Perhaps as a footnote of every article you could write a brief precis of your military service that enables you to comment in this area, including why you have this grudge against the services.
And to Adam "its always comfoting to read how impotent our military actually is".
I strongly recommend you find someone who has just returned from one of the UKs current war zones, hell find anyone currently wearing the uniform and tell them to their face they are "impotent", I'd love to see their response.
Yes there are problems in defence procurement, but in reality they are no worse and probably a damn sight better than most large scale government projects, and I'd wager a lot of industry ones too. Anyone who thinks they can do better is more than welcome to apply for a job in the civil service or join the forces and I'm sure they would be glad to have you onboard.
I too used the cadet, single shot, manual loading version of the SA80 (L98A1) in the Air Cadets (ATC) - however my experience was somewhat different to yours. The only issue I remember happening were jams when cocking it - is you pulled it back and let it spring forward on its own, everything was fine - but if a cadet pulled it back and pushed it forward - then it would jam. Consequently, it taught the cadets good cocking technique. I can't remember jamming it myself more than a couple of times over my 5 years in the cadets.
Having used it on a 200m range with basic uncalibrated iron sights, in the hands of a cadet it wasn't going to win any awards - but at the usual 25m ranges it wasn't impossible to get both the ATC Marksman and RAF Marksman awards if you had a little skill, took your time and breathed properly.
Kryten gun turret?
Why not go the whole hog & rename the ship HMS Dwarfer?
A billion pounds down the swanee & in the event of war it's "Engage panic mode"
Paris, because she's disappointed by someone armed with a mere 4.5 inches too!
Windows for Warships
Available soon at a ZuneStore near you.
Was this NOTAM'd???
An easy way to check if the MoD explanation is BS is to see if there was a NOTAM published for the flare dropping activity. I'm an ex ATCO so don't have access to daily NOTAM notices although I know it's out there on t'interweb but can't be arsed looking for it - I am not after all, a UFO investigator.
Is Cynicism Always Healthy
I know that Lewis knows what an AWD actually does, so why wind up the masses with this cynical BS? The Type 45 hasn't entered service yet, so not having its missiles fitted(they're on the way) isn't out of the ordinary. When it does enter service next year it will be one of , if not the, finest AWD afloat.
Furthermore, I find amazing(and sad) at some of the ignorant comments on here. I'm astounded by how little is known about our own country. Anonymous Coward indeed.
Let's get the radar thing right......
Primary radars are the type that receive a signal that's bounced off of the "target". Secondary radars use a transponder in the aircraft to receive the radar signal transmitted from the ground, and transmit their own response back - hence their ability to add additional information to the "return". Large civilian airports generally use both systems, with the secondary radar antenna mounted above the primary radar antenna, so that the " Plan Postion Indicator" display from each can be easily overlaid. Secondary radar is properly known as "Secondary Surveillance Radar" (SSR), in military terms sometimes referred to as IFF (Identification Friend or Foe).
Harbour Acceptance Testing
I don't believe anyone reading this article would actually expect a ship to actually use live weaponry for system testing in and around a city - not even Liverpool.
It might just be that they were testing the detection and tracking capabilities of their systems, which might use radar and/or a variety of other sensors. For such tests, you might not want to fire guns, launch missiles or use any kind of weaponry every time you run a test - so you might have some software to simulate the assorted weapon systems that would be at you disposal once the ship has been finished. Personally, I wouldn't want to be in the vicinity of the first tests of a fire control system which also used live ammunition.
Its just swamp gas from a weather balloon trapped in a thermal pocket...
Or we are all doomed!, doomed I tell you!! ... DOOMED!!! ... Either that or I've had to much coffee this morning!
So anyway, between the alien invasion and the rise of the robot (ships) we are doomed.
Maybe the aliens and the robots are working together?! ... It makes sense. (Well my nurse agrees). The answer is simple. The aliens and robots just (for a laugh) throw some flares at the fleshlings and point their gun at them, then watch them scatter and hide.
Anyway I have to go now, its time for my medication (for some strange reason it glows green).
There's no way they would be transmitting high powered radars if they were in Liverpool or anywhere within a couple of miles of shore, it interferes with radio and tv signals too much. Maybe they were testing the effectiveness of their Infra red tracking cameras whilst a suitable RAF asset was nearby.
But if it was aliens we should be ok. They'd be looking for intelligent life and there ain't much of that in the North West.
this is a title
to all the idiots - the ship is currently being fitted - not in service
in other news parts of a plane in BAe cant fly at the minute cause the wings are still in Germany
Before I heard the line about countermeasure flares I had assumed that the firey orange blobs dropping fire were simply good old fashioned fire kites.
I know of more than one UFO flap that has been caused by a bunch of fire kites. For obvious reasons I can't let you know when and where. It would spoil the fun.
Seems most likely to me that an RAF plane happened to be in the area, got 'lit up' by the ship's radar, and followed his training without thinking about where he was.
No AA missiles either? On a Type 45? What's it for, then?
what happened to deterrence?
The idea is, if you pretend that you can fend off everything, even aliens, then no enemy would dare to attack you.
Lewis, you let something like hot air out of the bag.
Firstly the new ship doesnt have its PHALANX guns installed yet
secondly less of the anti-liverpool jibes you southern fairy poofters
- Updated Zucker punched: Google gobbles Facebook-wooed Titan Aerospace
- Elon Musk's LEAKY THRUSTER gas stalls Space Station supply run
- Android engineer: We DIDN'T copy Apple OR follow Samsung's orders
- Pics Audio fans, prepare yourself for the Second Coming ... of Blu-ray
- Microsoft: Windows version you probably haven't upgraded to yet is ALREADY OBSOLETE