Google eyeballs planted on 92% of top websites

Back to the article

Anonymous Coward

(untitled) #

Posted Wednesday 3rd June 2009 02:59 GMT

"Google Analytics was used by over 71 per cent of the domains. Google AdSense was used by over 35 per cent. And Google DoubleClick was used by over 26 per cent."

Heading should have been googles eyeballs on 132% pf website

Christopher Martin

Noscript saves the day again? #

Posted Wednesday 3rd June 2009 03:50 GMT

google-analytics.com is not on my whitelist...

Anonymous Coward

SILENCE! #

Posted Wednesday 3rd June 2009 09:47 GMT

ALL HAIL THE GOOGLE OVERLORDS!

....What is thy bidding my master?

John Hawkins

Skewed statistics? #

Posted Wednesday 3rd June 2009 09:47 GMT

I block google-analytics.com as well. I guess quite a few of us in the industry do and it would be interesting to know how much that affects the stats collected. At least for certain subgroups.

Interesting that The Reg also uses google-analytics.com. Perhaps there's a message there somewhere.

Tom

You cant count the noscripts.... #

Posted Wednesday 3rd June 2009 09:47 GMT

I'd say 30% of the users I know use noscript - once people realise that pages are loaded slowly because of the off site garbage that poor inept marketing people are encouraged to add to their site then they seen to take to NoScript like ducks to water.

Edward Miles

Is it hypocritical... #

Posted Wednesday 3rd June 2009 09:47 GMT

...to run google analytics on your own site, but have it blocked by NoScript on every computer you use?

Anonymous Coward

I hate to be a firefoxtard..... #

Posted Wednesday 3rd June 2009 09:47 GMT

But since I was forced to use firefox and installed the noscripts plugin I have blocked all these trackers as standard.

Dave

Firefox Plugins #

Posted Wednesday 3rd June 2009 09:49 GMT

My solution is to block all that stuff with the ubiquitous Firefox plugins. I assume (possibly naively) that this removes me from much of this tracking.

Anonymous Coward

Lying toerags + Fix #

Posted Wednesday 3rd June 2009 09:49 GMT

Oh please, they aggregate the sites visited to target their adverts. Saying the cookie is different so they cannot aggregate is a fat lie. They have the IP address right there, at the back end they can cross link it however they want and have already said what they do with it.

http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/03/making-ads-more-interesting.html

They have also already admitted to be able to retrieve the searches made for any given IP address.

And their privacy director gives deceptive answers to questions like he doesn't know or more likely wants to mislead.

THE FIX: TOnline in Germany change the IP address assigned to each user every night at about 2am. That is the fix to prevent IP address tracking. Setting firefox to only accept cookies from the site visited, and remove them on closing the browser is another fix. Going into the hosts file and blocking the analytics sites (all of them) is another essential.

A J Stiles

Not necessarily #

Posted Wednesday 3rd June 2009 09:49 GMT

google-analytics.com is just one of the domains diverted by the name server on my LAN.

Sonya Fox

I block them #

Posted Wednesday 3rd June 2009 09:49 GMT

I'm paranoid about these idiotic tracking cookies. Its a shame that companies like Google have to make the net irritating, especially when simply turning off cookies, even third party cookies, makes it impossible to log into legitimate websites. Opera has a nice feature that lets you accept or decline cookies, and remember to accept or decline for that domain in the future. Its a pain in the ass but it beats accepting tracking cookies from the likes of Zedo, Google, and Doubleclick.

Also, @AnonCow:

They didn't mean all of those services together, a site can use AdSense AND Google Analytics, etc...

Scott Evil

This very website has 3 #

Posted Wednesday 3rd June 2009 09:49 GMT

My Ghostery reveals:

Quantcast

Google Analytics

Google Adsense

Its everywhere

Ghostery + No script FTW

Paris because you dont have a busty cleavge avatar,and everyone loves boobies!

Anonymous Coward

I am glad... #

Posted Wednesday 3rd June 2009 09:49 GMT

...that I AdBlock/NoScript the hell out of this stuff. I can see perfectly good reasons of a site to want to know about my return (e.g. shopping cart) and I have no real issue with them using their data to pick an add (you bought a torch, would you like batteries?)

But aggregation across sites just raises way, way too many privacy concerns. The browser session may be shared with others, for example, do you want ads for STD services appearing when a pal borrows the PC? No.

And that's just the simple example. Data mining, profiling etc would make it perfectly feasible to identify you as an individual. And what protections would their be against abuse? None really. You'd have HMRC scanning your record on Amazon and then fining you as the amount of your purchases did not match your tax return or something.

Given the threat such web bugs pose, will El Reg be dropping Google Analytics etc?

Francis Irving

Open source Google analytics #

Posted Wednesday 3rd June 2009 09:49 GMT

If you're a privacy freak website owner, then take a look at open source http://piwik.org/ to use instead of Google Analytics - surprisingly good. Unlike other open source web stats tools, it uses a javascript webbug like Google Analytics.

Anonymous Coward

correct me if I'm wrong #

Posted Wednesday 3rd June 2009 12:02 GMT

windows host file:

127.0.0.1 www.google-analytics.com

Anonymous Coward

@correct me if I'm wrong #

Posted Wednesday 3rd June 2009 17:49 GMT

Seems ok to me.

Would putting it on the router blacklist also work ? (I have a nightmare getting noscript, ABP etc on all the machines on my home network)

John Ryland

Too big to fail? #

Posted Wednesday 3rd June 2009 22:30 GMT

How's this for a scary thought... with Google's dominance and integration is it getting too big to fail?

Anonymous Coward

Someone has to say it.... #

Posted Thursday 4th June 2009 09:10 GMT

All yuor privacies are belong to us!

Forums

Forums home