Errr actually, No I'm not. So how can the BSA, with no enforcement abilities (AFAIK), persuade companies to do auditing, to condemn themselves.

Silly people

Alternatively scrap expensive proprietary software and switch to open source.

...those that don't fill out the surevey get a knock on the door..

Perhaps as part of this audit they could also see if there are cheaper alternative (free/open source?) packages instead which would resolve the need for this kind of audit?

Since when are fonts "software"?

fonts are vector graphics, collection of shapes - very much like clipart.

so how does that make it a software????

- it's the same as saying that a copyrighted photograph is software...

I remember one of these some years back. My reaction was to take offence that someone would think they had the right to ask what was going on inside our company. My second thought was to realise that refusing their request would lead to guilt by association. Ignoring it might do the same. I should point out that most of our software was properly licensed (with the exception of some lunchtime Quake / Unreal installs - which gives you an idea of when this was!).

My final idea was to ignore it for a while until chased, then apologise but refer to our (probably real) company privacy policy prohibiting outside entities from any knowledge of our systems. As we were doing work for a particularly paranoid government agency this wasn't so far from the truth.

Unfortunately I left before finding out how they reacted, but if I was in the same position again that's how I would respond.

Can it altogether and switch to open source.

Paris, 'cause she's open to all kinds of things.

"London’s businesses cannot afford to waste money on legal actions". So how about the BSA doing their part and not starting any?

I'm breaking no law and am not obliged to prove it to anybody, least of all an organisation which has no statutory powers.

If they think they can prove it, they're welcome to waste their own time and money, not mine.

This is a blatant fishing expedition.

"The right for the BSA to go raid you, you signed when you sign those Microsoft licenses, foolish you. So now they expect you to spend money on man hours to list every piece of software in your business and prove the licenses for those.

Failure to do so and they'll come visit, taking up your valuable time anyway."

So then logically if you have pirated your software the BSA has no legal right to audit you as you've never signed/agreed to the crazy 'EULAs' that come with commercial SW.

So the BSA wants everybody "to keep the software they are using up-to-date and legal".

I do understand the legal issue, but what is their point about keeping it up-to-date? I love my ancient pieces of software, they run and run and run ...

Try OpenProj, which is now run by Serena (used to be run by Projity, but both their site and the original openproj.org site are now GoDaddy parking pages). You can also find it on SourceForge:

http://www.serena.com/products/openproj/

http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=199315

It also support MS Proj formats.

I saw a trailer on one of the Sky channels the other day for a programme called 'Ross Kemp on Pirates'. Are the BSA employing the bald headed nutter now?

In the US, communications between client and attorney are privileged communications.

I have been told, that if you get one of those letters, you should consult an attorney ASAP. It is my understanding that you should have your attorney perform the audit, so that the details are considered privileged, and not subject to discovery by the BSA in the event they decide to sue you.

AFAIAC, they (BSA) can go straight to hell!!

The PC software companies and the Licence enforcement bodies such as the BSA need to get receptive and connect with reality as to what’s happening on the street! As you will agree the world is constantly changing, and the 70’s software sales business model is archaic and confusing. It was born in an era where the software delivery was via floppy discs or tape. It has no place in today’s consumer led market that is educated and serviced by the internet.

The most successful companies really understand their customers perceived worth of their product offering and tailor the price according to their customer’s ability to pay and the various competitive factors. Today consumer products and services can be acquired in the size relating to your needs and affordability. Yet software licences are still sold as a whole product irrespective of how heavy a user you are or how often you use it.

Imagine if you were able or lease it on a monthly or even daily basis or pay for the hours you actually use it. This is not vapour ware as tool hire companies and DVD rentals do just that. Sure you will make less profit in the beginning, but the volume will grow at a pace to easily cover the revenue lost. It could also be very profitable business if its bill as per use.

For too long the software industry has buried its head in the sand and hoped piracy will go away. Like the movie and music industry have found out, piracy changes the way they have had to deliver their product. The web has altered the dynamics. They could not battle with the free download of songs; hence the iTunes and other download stores were born and surprisingly found eager custom from users who did not want illegal content on their MP3 player. They also offered consumers the choice to purchase a single song from an album at a nominal cost. This was very different from you could only buy a single if it was released on hard copy. Again it was about serving the customer and not just your shareholders and internal agenda.

Piracy will not disappear but grow as demand increases and more people get used to free applications. It will also get more sophisticated and the pirates will out market the legitimate channel with their offerings. They have yet to offer bundles and OEM choices. IDC please take note.

Software companies have invested millions in promoting SAM (Software Asset Management) and the biggest benefactors have been the Consultants implementing this questionable benefit. You still don’t see numbers from the BSA stating this many thousand PC’s are now dormant due to layoffs, and the value of redundant licences is X million UK £. What happened to all of Lehman Brothers licenses? Once the economy picks up then hopefully those moth balled licences can be put back into use. But I have my doubts.

Software Companies be honest and examine the vast profits you make to compensate some stock holders and top management. The margins in that industry beat anything else that comes to mind.

Use some of that to design a new model of delivery so people pay what they use and they can buy in smaller more affordable chunks. Say thank you and reward your regular users. Remember you have a lot of loyal customers who continue to pay you significant subscription dues and upgrade costs.

Look at mobile phones. Pay as you Go has opened the market to a huge customer segment. Africa and parts of Asia saw an explosion of phone use once you could buy air time at numerous kiosks for as little as 50p top up. In the beginning only the well heeled could afford a mobile phone, just as in UK whole segments of population did not consider them affordable or a necessity. It was only when the air time packages came down in price and coupled with affordable basic phones, did the consumer embrace and leverage the benefits of the extensive network mobile phone companies had built. Had this revolution in retailing not happened the penetration in some markets would be 5% at most, compared to the current 60-80% due to pay as you go? Imagine if the only way you could have a mobile phone was by contract?

That’s just what the software industry is largely doing right now and it can’t see the bigger opportunity of using a new more customer centric delivery model. It will take a brave software brand to change this, and Google has already begun. Look at Picasa and ask why bother buying a licence for a photo image manager?

Perhaps the BSA should stop making us feel guilty and make less noise about the millions $ lost to piracy and look at what was left on the table because the sales proposition did not excite the consumer.