With every tuppenny-ha'penny laptop and netbook coming with a built-in web cam, and laptops taking an ever larger chunk of the computer market, it’s probably fair to say business ain't want it used to be when it comes to flogging external webcams. So has Philips' new SPC1330NC Webcam Pro got what it takes to make it a worthwhile …
Doing the maths...
Let's see - 2Mpix, 90fps, (assumed) 16-bit color depth, (assumed) no in-camera compression - that would generate almost 3Gbits/second. USB3.0 killer app? :-)
Try to get someone who doesn't look like a slightly special needs armed robber to appear in the pictures. Just a thought.
Does it work with Linux or Mac?
Or is it another load of Windows only crap.
Learn to read:
"While Philips makes no mention of Mac or Linux support – the software bundle is Windows only – the SPC1330 worked out of the box with Skype on both a MacBook Pro and an old Advent laptop running Ubuntu. Certainly, the MacBook's iSight camera performed better than the Dell's, but it was still left in the dust by the SPC1330."
Honestly, I don't know why some people bother.
Still, good image quality, and as my old Philips camera doesn't work on NT6 or above, I might have to have a shufty.
@ Next time...
I resemble that remark!
Alex - last para. bud. Yes it worked just fine with Skype on a Linux netbook and on a MacBook Pro.
You sir are a genius.
I laughed so much I think a little bit of wee came out.
Didn't mean any harm by it but the guy DOES look a bit special...
And I can't work out if "I resemble that remark!" is supposed to say 'resent' or if it's an attempt at a pun?
@Next time, @Cheers...
I think the 'Wanted dead or alive' poster effect says it all really.
A PS3 Eye competitor
Might be good for use with large FTIR touch screen setups.
For example MS surface.
I think you're all being a little harsh. I was going to say angry infant.
Since when is digital zoom a feature of the lens?
Great to see GNU/Linux testing...
...but if the reviewer could be encouraged to open a terminal shell, type 'lsusb' and report the chip in the device? Then non Ubuntu users would know whether or not the device is likely yot work with other distros.
Or they could, y'know, go and get a girlfriend instead.
So, the specs are 90fps but not, 8mp but not, and HD quality, but not.
Why the hell do they bother with the specs? Here, then - I'm going to sell a camera with 52 megapixels, 10,000 frames per second, and 256 bits per pixel color depth. Except not. What do I win?
And a bottle of snake oil
Unless you took still images of a picture of a painting, I don't see the "consistently fine performance." A 75% rating is generous for a product that's ugly, takes bad pictures, and has false specifications all over the front of the box. I would have returned it for a refund.
- +Comment Trips to Mars may be OFF: The SUN has changed in a way we've NEVER SEEN
- OnePlus One cut-price Android phone on sale to all... for 1 HOUR
- MARS NEEDS WOMEN, claims NASA pseudo 'naut: They eat less
- UNIX greybeards threaten Debian fork over systemd plan
- Back to the ... drawing board: 'Hoverboard' will disappoint Marty McFly wannabes