Google protects Colonel Sanders' privacy
SuperTim
That isnt Col. Sanders #
Posted Friday 15th May 2009 09:57 GMT

And if you allege it is, you are in breach of privacy laws.
Thumb lickin' good!
amanfromMars
Keep Up the Good Work, Google. Turning the other Cheek is a Gas. #
Posted Friday 15th May 2009 09:57 GMT
"Now it just needs to get its strumpet-arse-blurring algorithm working properly. ®" ...... http://regmedia.co.uk/2009/04/27/madrid_street_view_grab_2.jpg
Lester,
I would just like to say that I think it is working just perfectly the way it is. Although higher definition for deeper involvement is always a respectable goal for an Algorithm on AIMission. :-)
Anonymous Coward
Wait what? #
Posted Friday 15th May 2009 09:57 GMT
Did you really just write an article on street view's face detection working exactly as it should do? "Face blurring technology found to blur faces, more at 11"
Sampler
This just in... #
Posted Friday 15th May 2009 09:57 GMT
Colonel Sanders caught eating at Burger King:
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=2573370&id=692672237
D@v3
not just KFC #
Posted Friday 15th May 2009 10:12 GMT
but posters as well apparantly
http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=kfc&sll=51.49282,-0.231872&sspn=0,359.986181&ie=UTF8&layer=c&cbll=51.492549,-0.229686&panoid=G7ftlTUozpS6b64Hzl8VhA&cbp=12,336.31,,0,0.67&ll=51.492553,-0.229855&spn=0,359.972363&z=15&iwloc=A
Anonymous Coward
The more important point is this... #
Posted Friday 15th May 2009 10:12 GMT

How do you KNOW it's Colonel Sanders, despite the blurring? Well, it's obvious. You know from the context of (a) the location and (b) the surrounding colours, his outfit, etc.
Couldn't you do exactly the same for an ACTUAL person - for example, a person near their home, wearing an outfit they always wear?
And therefore is blurring faces really enough to protect people's privacy?
I don't really care myself, but just a thought ;)
A J Stiles
Clearly #
Posted Friday 15th May 2009 10:12 GMT

Clearly this is a propaganda exercise! By blurring out even artificial faces, Google are trying to make out that the blurring process is automatic and indiscriminate.
D@v3
in my defense #
Posted Friday 15th May 2009 12:05 GMT

That link was the url in the page i was looking at, it just doesnt correspond to the image i was looking at (for some googlish reason)
this should work
http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=worcester+park&sll=51.492553,-0.229855&sspn=0,359.95451&ie=UTF8&ll=51.378853,-0.242214&spn=0.033054,0.090981&z=14&iwloc=A&layer=c&cbll=51.378781,-0.242056&panoid=AewXRVkU352Wom-sEFOnOQ&cbp=12,10.07,,1,16.01
Hans
missing the point? #
Posted Friday 15th May 2009 12:21 GMT
You seem to be forgetting what Google is all about, and how it raises it revenues.
I believe it is only a matter of time before all such street-side establishments receive a bill through the door, from Google "For advertising services provided by Street View"
(Notice the intentional omission of the "Joke Alert" icon)
John H 66
I know the 11. #
Posted Friday 15th May 2009 12:21 GMT

I really do. Haw Haw.
No... you can't just google it either :P
Anonymous Coward
Hmm #
Posted Friday 15th May 2009 13:31 GMT

I'd rather have things that aren't faces blurred than not have some faces blurred.
Or maybe they should just blur the entire image.
Ian Michael Gumby
@Hans... #
Posted Friday 15th May 2009 15:35 GMT
While what you said in jest, the fact that KFC has made the request shows that it is going through the motions to protect its trademark.
Google is complying with the request because even if the 'street view' shot was taken in the public, the use is part of a 'for profit' venture. So they either have to compenstate KFC or comply.
So what we should all do is trademark the front face of our houses and then order Google to blur them out! ;-)
Anonymous Coward
next up in the news #
Posted Friday 15th May 2009 21:37 GMT

Google re-shooting street view in japan to not show grumblers over the fence. ho-hum
Oninoshiko
@Ian Michael Gumby #
Posted Friday 15th May 2009 21:37 GMT
more likely then not, the face detection algo decided that the cartoon Col. Sanders was a real person, not that KFC is protecting their trademark.
actually because of the context, it is in actual reference to KFC, this is not a trademark violation.
rewr
Google Street View Originals... #
Posted Friday 15th May 2009 21:53 GMT

Hmmm...didn't have much luck blurring this fellows ^&&^DF:
http://streetviewgallery.corank.com/tech/story/definitely-Not-Safe-for-Work
raving angry loony
not effective #
Posted Saturday 16th May 2009 19:54 GMT
More proof that the incomplete blurring of the face that they're doing DOESN'T DO A DAMN THING to protect the privacy of those they snap. Asshats.
Stephen Gray
It doesnt work on bears #
Posted Tuesday 19th May 2009 14:23 GMT
Goto Google Maps, type in 54 Great Russell St, Camden Town click on Street view and there is Paddington Bear and he's still got a face....
William Oakley
Same with Kings Head #
Posted Tuesday 19th May 2009 15:18 GMT
Google protecting innocent pubs..
mittfh
Paddington... #
Posted Thursday 21st May 2009 09:35 GMT
He gets around...also spotted at Trafalgar Square (unblurred, of course!):
http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?layer=c&cbll=51.507258,-0.127481&panoid=ZX7jlmg9lV4npvbYU3uBUw&cbp=12,289.26,,1,10.89&ie=UTF8&ll=51.507434,-0.127995&spn=0,359.985859&z=16
At first I thought he'd been digitally inserted, but you can also see him from the opposite side of the roundabout.
Stephen Gray
Paddington #
Posted Thursday 21st May 2009 11:53 GMT
Its clear that this is the first indicator of an imminent invasion, I had been stockpiling marmalade sandwiches to bribe our hairy overlords but now I've been told I need Marmite instead....
sweetbayag
thanks google #
Posted Monday 25th May 2009 04:41 GMT
at least they did! i salute them :)
http://deathbyporno.blogspot.com