Still waiting for that fantastic content to be available in Linux... Oh well back to watch ashes to ashes on the iplayer

Why are these clowns insisting on legitimatizing Silverlight for MS?

I understand the need for MS compatibility products such as Wine and Samba which can be useful for switchers to maintain compatibility with existing and ubiquitous MS based products and services.

The keyword here however is "ubiquitous". So far, even 'dozers are resisting the temptation to install Silverlight which is currently making it hard for MS to entrench itself in that particular market space, which has to be a good thing.

It's not as if the internet is covered in great swathes of sites that require Silverlight. Apart from a few high profile sites that MS have bribed into going Silverlight there is hardly anything out there at all.

I wonder if Ballmer is secretly paying this Miguel fellow to do all this work. After all the more people using Silverlight the better, even if some of them are those dirty Linux creeps, and it's not as if he can't just pull the rug out from under those hippies with some well aimed patent lawsuits once Silverlight is entrenched, then he can go back to making sure that Silverlight remains a Windows only lock in technology and just another reason that people will have to run Windows.

What's the bet that the new MS Office product uses Silverlight extensively and will no longer be runnable under wine?

Oh and also, I WANT MY EVIL BALLMER ICON!

That is all.

Just tell us what we all want to know. Does netflix work yet?

Meguel is Meguel. He likes the stuff from Microsoft and he is a big fan of the stuff they do right. He is also a lover of Open Source/Free software and all that. His first move in his carreer was to apply for a position in the Internet Explorer development staff. Tried to convince them to open it, even. But couldn't get the visa to program in the USA.

So combine those two features (love of open source and admiration of Microsoft) and you get things like Gnome and Mono.

Which isn't bad. Gnome, dispite all the KDE fanbois's objections, is the standard Linux desktop environment. It's the most stable one and provides the most advantages to both software open source developers and proprietary ISVs. It provides the most usable desktop and is the simpliest for new users to use.

Mono is fine also. I prefer to have a combination of Python and C, were appropriate, but whatever. It's personal taste.

All the MS hate isn't doing anybody's any favors. They are not satan incarnate nor are they any worse then Adobe, Apple, Oracle, or any other company that makes almost all their money off of proprietary software. If you have any doubts who is the bigger asshole google for "apple sues". For every one Microsoft sues lawsuit you'll find at least 3 for Apple.

In the case of Silverlight it's a open format and documented. Microsoft encourages Moonlight, even going as far as to license codecs for Moonlight users to use.

Meanwhile Adobe flash is still proprietary shit with a 2 half-working open source attempts at compatibility.

If given a choice between Adobe's closed source undocumented crap and Microsoft's documented crap with a decent open source version.. I'll take silverlight every time.

That the gap is closing is irrelevant. What's important is that there is a gap at all. Don't expect MS to ever allow a functional equivalent implementation on linux. It is nothing more an attempt to buy some godwill in standards-concious government-cirles while bullying media-sites into adopting another lock-in technology

I think Silverlight is better than Flash -- at least, most of the specs are open. However, it seems like Moonlight will never be enough: by the time they got out 1.0, there were absolutely no Silverlight 1 compliant sites left on the web: all had moved on to Silverlight 2. Now that Moonlight 2 is coming, Silverlight 3 will arrive, making it again meaningless. And on, and on?

It is quite likely that even Windows users are not hitting Silverlight's moving target. What proportion of computers are Silverlight 2 enabled today? Probably not that many.

"Meguel is Meguel. He likes the stuff from Microsoft and he is a big fan of the stuff they do right. He is also a lover of Open Source/Free software and all that."

Right, so he is what the Soviets used to refer to as a "useful idiot".

Paris, because she's another example of a useful idiot . . .

Will people here please stop thinking that Open Source projects always = Linux.

This is not true !!!

Open source can run on a Windows server.

Check out http://www.dotnetnuke.com - a very successful open source framework based on .NET. it's about time this project got some more publicity from the Reg.... please broaden your minds. Just because it runs on MS software it does not mean it isn't Open Source or somehow contaminated!

Just because the base layer might not be open source, it doesn't mean that projects running above this layer aren't open source....!

The headline should have been "Linux closes gap on Microsoft's next Silverlight".

Many thanks...

I use the BBC Iplayer (based around the Adobe Air product) on Opensuse Linux which I find works pretty well now they have ironed out a few of the bugs.

However like the first comment it drives me nuts when a company like ITV use silverlight which does not work with Linux ( Moonlight does not work on the ITV.COM website) Even after you install moonlight the ITV.COM insists you install Silverlight which then redirects you to the moonlight download. Typical bloody Microsoft bullshit.

If you use Linux please visit the ITV.COM link below and comment on why you would like to see ITV use a cross platform ( windows/Linux/MAC..) DRM based media player such as Adobe Air like the BBC use and not a product like Silverlight which is only designed to keep out alternative operating system competition.

http://www.itv.com/ContactUs/itvcomfeedback/default.html

It takes only a few minutes to give ITV some feedback, you never know they may listen, just like the BBC did.