@Author #
Posted Tuesday 21st April 2009 13:24 GMT
"and each VM could handle 4 MB of memory."
Don't you mean 4GB?
Posted Tuesday 21st April 2009 13:24 GMT
It appears VMware is trying to confuse the market by rebranding their products and creating more SKUs. This is crap. With Microsoft, Citrix, Xen, and Oracle offering free hypervisors, free high availability and free live migration, many of us were expecting a price drop. According to this article/press release, live migration is $2200+ per processor. WTF? Appears after years of gouging customers, VMware is responding with the finger.
Posted Tuesday 21st April 2009 13:24 GMT
"Cloud OS"
NYOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAGGHGHGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!
Posted Tuesday 21st April 2009 13:24 GMT
"and each VM could handle 4 MB of memory."
Don't you mean 4GB?
Posted Tuesday 21st April 2009 13:24 GMT
"ESX Server 2.X, the hypervisor could span one or two processors and each VM could handle 4 MB of memory"
4 meg !?! ITYM gig.... unless v2 *was* *really* bad !
Posted Tuesday 21st April 2009 16:04 GMT
255GB in a single VM?
Just because you can, doesn't mean that you should...
Posted Wednesday 22nd April 2009 07:41 GMT
Impressive specs, assuming you ignore the 4M/4G typo; obviously vSphere is not for a small organisation... it will be interesting to see the uptake of this
vSphere now becomes a rather large SPOF target; hope the security around the management is tight.
@Roberth Amleth: if Microsoft, Citrix, Xen, and Oracle can match this, I have no doubt they would charge as well...