Prof: Fat ladies don't get to be CEOs, lardy blokes do
John Mackenzie
Fat ladies don't get to be CEOs... #
Posted Wednesday 8th April 2009 12:55 GMT

Probably because they are too busy singing.....
...getting coat
Master Baker
How do you get a Fat Bird into bed? #
Posted Wednesday 8th April 2009 13:37 GMT

Piece of cake...
al
Is it the cause or just a corelation ? #
Posted Wednesday 8th April 2009 13:37 GMT

Isn't it entirely possible that women who are career conscious are also health conscious ?
Paris, coz she might be CEO of Hilton hotels one day
(and finally would have execs lined up - to eat rather than be eaten).
Anonymous Coward
One problem. #
Posted Wednesday 8th April 2009 13:37 GMT

Imagine the questionnaire with regard to this research.
Q. Is your female CEO fat? (Y/N)
Now - who in their right mind would answer 'Y' ?
Osiris
This is a title #
Posted Wednesday 8th April 2009 13:48 GMT

Time to start working on that promotion.
Mines the one with the cream pies in the pockets.
Tony
meh #
Posted Wednesday 8th April 2009 14:43 GMT
Is it not possible that none of them were fat when they got the job, but that less figure-conscious men spent their 7 figure salary on eating out and beer, whereas with women under more (perceived) pressure to look slim and healthy they spent theirs on personal trainers or liposuction?
Brutus
Correlation? #
Posted Wednesday 8th April 2009 14:43 GMT

Did the researchers check historical photos to ensure that the CEOs had been fat/thin before climbing that greasy pole? I would be very interested to know if the job of CEO turns a boss-lite into a lard-boss (and equally if the stresses of running HP would cause a boss to lose weight).
Tom
brutus #
Posted Wednesday 8th April 2009 14:59 GMT
After calling bullshit on another piece on the reg, you took the words out of my mouth...
In other news: Men who drive frequently are fatter than their walking counterparts, therefore, regulaly buying petrol makes you fat.
Anonymous Coward
drool #
Posted Wednesday 8th April 2009 14:59 GMT

Just think how many doughnuts you could buy with £x,000,000 pa.
Anonymous Coward
I Guess Lee Did OK #
Posted Wednesday 8th April 2009 15:31 GMT

http://www.pacificviews.org/weblog/archives/images/lee_raymond.jpg
Anonymous Coward
In other news #
Posted Wednesday 8th April 2009 19:17 GMT

IT folks are geekier than the general population.
Jim
pencil33 #
Posted Wednesday 8th April 2009 19:17 GMT
I'm with Brutus: do the blokes balloon out after becoming CEO, or while in middle management, or are they tubby to start with ? At what age should I start dodging the lettuce ?
Peyton
too perfect #
Posted Wednesday 8th April 2009 19:17 GMT
Someone needs to send this report to the fellas that had the plastic surgery in the other article- apparently they should've spent their loan on some sort of reverse-liposuction!
John Savard
I'm not surprised #
Posted Wednesday 8th April 2009 19:17 GMT
If one looks at newsreaders - what we call anchorpersons on this side of the Atlantic - one will find the same thing. Men are not judged by their looks nearly as much as women are. An older man, or one with a bit of extra weight, might simply be thought of as mature and wise, but when women put on weight, or show their age, the impression others - to some extent, even women as well as men - have is exclusively negative.
A study that confirms the obvious might be a waste of time, but I wouldn't suspect it of finding the wrong answer.
RW
When did a CEO become a lard-ass and why? #
Posted Wednesday 8th April 2009 22:06 GMT
Simply put, age.
The majority of men thicken as they age. A former boss of mine, as lean and active a person as you will ever meet, ran into me years after he'd moved on. I was shocked at how he'd gone very thick through the middle.
Ergo, since it takes longer to become CEO than a middle management drone, CEOs can be expected to be heftier than mm.
QED etc.
MadonnaC
@RW #
Posted Thursday 9th April 2009 09:40 GMT

I agree - some bosses i know have grown as thick as 2 short planks
debaser
hamburgler fatties #
Posted Thursday 9th April 2009 14:17 GMT
41% overweight?
I thought that sounded low, 66% according to:
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/overwt.htm
Anyway, as other commenters have already argued, the whole process is highly flawed and subjective.
Dave
Logic #
Posted Thursday 9th April 2009 14:17 GMT

"Given that all this is based on wild guesses at body mass index (BMI), and that BMI is itself a deeply suspicious way of measuring fatness"
Not so. The experiment was clearly based on actual (apparent) body mass, not on BMI at all. The latter may have been quoted in the study but you have your comment totally reversed.