Can't believe people still use that crock of shite! I gave it the elbow over 4 years ago when it started bloating and became a total resource hog. AVG went the same way... pah!

Disgusted (though not from Tunbridge Wells)

millermia on the zone alarm forum found the file in a hidden folder, not a "non-existent" folder and there are many similar hidden folders used by other apps in "Documents and Settings\All Users\Application Data\" so it isn't the unholy rootkit armageddia you are punting. Journalism these days seems to be based on the the 6 W's What, When, Where, Why, Who and Worry your readers into a state of fear and apoplexy.

They are crap and slow and now hide backdoors.

There are plenty of alternatives that do a far better job.

It looks like the bad guys are up to their trick of jumping on the bandwagon again.

We're seeing evidence that websites containing malware are showing up in search engine results when people hunt for PIFTS. Sophos is picking up some of these sites as Mal/BadRef-A.

The Mal/BadRef-A script redirects to another malicious script (Troj/Reffor-A) which then itself redirects to a page detected as Mal/FakeAvJs-A.

That page leads to a fake anti-virus scan (scareware) designed to frighten you out of your hard earned cash.

Cheers

Graham Cluley, Sophos

I dont use that bloated piece of crap called Norton. If they cant be honest by atleast saying its part of OUR program and no we wont tell you what it does, but instead delete questions without so much as a comment. Hope this encourages more people to stop using it.

/Flames cause im sure they will come.

Think the file has been altered or was not intended for commercial release. The file has been "padded" out to size (the last few Bytes of the file is filled with the word "PACKINGPACKINGPACKING" etc... etc... this is usually found in tampered or virus like files...

How many people does this really affect? 5? 10? Maybe a dozen at the most. Can't be any more that that still using Norton crapware.

I thought everyone had deleted that Norton crap off their computers years ago.

Thumbs down to all Symantec software.

This is not the file you are looking for...

is dat sum exploit?

Public relations - Symantec fails it

Anyone given thought to the possibility that Symantec do not want this talked about because it potentially reveals an as-yet unused tactic for detecting and removing malware? 'Rootkit-like behaviour' could indeed indicate Symantec moving into using such technology against malware.

I actively despise Norton product line and campaign (in my own small way) against its use, but I don't let my hatred cloud my judgement. It's a shame so many others do.

Norton say it was a program distributed with an update that sent information back to their servers to give them an idea of the number of people needing to be migrated to a newer version. They say the number of people moving up to Windows 7 meant they had to calculate the load this would put on servers to migrate people over to a newer Norton.

The file is not in a "non-existent" folder. It's in a hidden folder.

This is obviously down to the new small footprint for Norton that we hear so much about - what could be smaller, datawise, than saving the info in a non-existent file?

Congrats to Norton, next time they will hope to not be found out........

Paris, Oh dear, has she been found out.......

Time for a new sexist icon? How about a homosexualist icon? just for a laugh, obviously, I quite like Paris - at a distance, .....in my dreams

Anyone else appreciate the irony of not one, not two but THREE adverts for "Symantec Recovery" on this article?

Mine's the one with tinfoil lining and matching hat...

Darn, what a killjoy.

Had the chopper set up with a new coat of black paint, and all gassed up and ready to go...

Too late ... looks like others had already taken off

...............have a virus than Norton, the virus does less damage to your system, and is easier to remove with reputable tools. Always good to see a spanner in the works of the MS/Symantec protection racket.

Amusing to see Symantec talking about scareware isn't it.

Tux, cos he don't need no stinkin' anti-malware malware.

I like their comment that they were being abused as multiple new accounts were being created to discuss the problem.

So all these people who saw the problem and wanted to talk about it were being malicious.

And if they are deleting such posts, no wonder it was followed by some of the 'spam' they received.

Damn right! I dumped it about 3-4 years ago, it was such a pig to maintain, always crashed and it was an even bigger pig to remove, it always left small residual traces behind. You either needed to rebuild or go out onto "da web" to pick up the Norton removal kits, written by hackers to get the damn thing out.

It's crap but like Windows itself, Joe P. is happy to lump the problems and live with it!

Don't worry - there'll be another panic-button to hit soon, so keep the chopper blades spinning. That's the great thing about the internet and forums, it's sooo easy to get a conspiracy theory off the ground :)

I really don't see the point of AV software like Norton and McAfee or even AVG (which the 'IT guy' insists we have to have installed and running (I switch mine off) on our workstations at all times). Others are right to suggest they are nothing but unweildly system hogs.

On my personal PC at home I don't use any of 'em. If I get a trojan or some such hijack I just use things like Malwarebytes, Windows Washer and CC Cleaner. My PC at home is far more stable, cleaner and reliable than the AV-enabled piece of crap I'm forced to use at work.

Go figure.

You obviously have no idea how much damage an infection can do to a corporate network, not to mention the various problems you could suffer by breaking various laws (like the DPA) which mean you have to actually take care of the data you hold.

I could go on, but I have a feeling i'm wasting my breath.....

Crawl back under your bridge like a good little troll.

If only your statement was correct, unfortunately its not... One thing Symantec is really good at is making money, they hold 50% + market share, so this little gem is affecting millions upon millions of unenlightened, slow, stupid or otherwise retarded people who fall victim to symantec, whos corporate motto is: We are betting at making money than we are at making useful products, but we dont give a fuck because we've already got your money!

if you're using Symantec products then you've already noobed out and deserve what you get.

Simply change.