Can I be the first one to say ... #
Posted Thursday 26th February 2009 12:19 GMT
The Eyeball in the Sky!
Posted Thursday 26th February 2009 12:19 GMT
"has quickly been dubbed the "Eye of God", for obvious reasons"
What obvious reasons? Yes, it looks like an eye, but lets not let credulity and religious bullcrap get in the way of perfectly good astronomy.
Posted Thursday 26th February 2009 12:19 GMT
The Eyeball in the Sky!
Posted Thursday 26th February 2009 13:14 GMT
Yes, I'm sure all those astronomers in Chile have converted the observatory into a mountain top monastery cult-base for their new religion.
Or perhaps not.
What would you rather they call it? The eye of Sauron?
Posted Thursday 26th February 2009 13:14 GMT
I'd put money* on there being a similar 'nebula' adjacent, along with a nose, mouth, etc...
Just look out for the coming of the great white handkerchief.
*about 3p if anyone wants to take the bet.
Posted Thursday 26th February 2009 13:14 GMT
Lets keep the non-existant supernatural out of science.
Posted Thursday 26th February 2009 13:14 GMT
welcome our new ocular OverLord! ... oops, OverDeity, I mean[1].
[1] May his peerless retina forgive my foolish oversight.
Posted Thursday 26th February 2009 13:14 GMT
It's not really that different from the image that was Astronomy Picture of the day back in May 2003. Impressive nonetheless though :-)
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap030510.html
Posted Thursday 26th February 2009 13:14 GMT
Surely anybody with even a basic sense of logic can only be drawing the conclusion from this and various rigourously conducted scientific research that there is NO "god".
If the sky-fairy brigade want to take every bit of evidence leading towards big bang theory and turn that on its head to meet their own "god" agenda then that is their right, of course, but I would expect El Reg to fall on the side of rationalism not superstition.
Sure, it looks like an (human/animal) eye, but given nobody (who hasn't received a sharp blow on the head or is suffering mental illness or delusions) has actually seen "god" (why might that be I wonder??) how does anybody conclude it looks like the "eye of god".
</rant>
Paris - at least she exists.
Posted Thursday 26th February 2009 13:14 GMT
Not to deflate this story but this image came round on email months ago.
It's nice but not exactly what I'd call the Eye of God.
Looks like he had a late night.
And blue eyes? Think he/she/it has got blonde hair too? Maybe a beard and white robe as well?
Oh do just give up.
Besides there's loads of better pics of galaxies and nebula that would make a much better contender for 'Eye of God' status.
Personally I'll keep an eye out for the left earlobe of God.
Or maybe the quiff of the Almighty.
Posted Thursday 26th February 2009 13:14 GMT
"Clams got legs!"
Oh. Sorry. Wrong cartoon.
Mine's the one with the "Footrot Flats" compendium in the pocket.
Posted Thursday 26th February 2009 13:18 GMT
The Eye of Harmony.
Less likely to agitate the pro/anti-religious nutters, and finally some stellar recognition for Gallifrey. Yes I know that strictly it should be a black hole, but lets be a little creative. Think of it as a re-imagining.
I guess I'll have the one with the really stiff high collar and shoulder pads.
(Want to know why they wear them? To avoid being stabbed in the back by all the other Lord Cardinals)
Posted Thursday 26th February 2009 13:18 GMT
The "obvious reasons" are that believers think God resides in the heavens. Hell, even sci fi fans do too - you never seen the Futurama Episode "Godfellas"?
Posted Thursday 26th February 2009 13:18 GMT
Because this is 100% PROOF that GOD EXISTS and is WATCHING US from The HEAVENS!!
FFS DONT YOU SCIENSE GEEKS KNOW ANYT~HING!!!!!
YOU'LL BE SORY
Posted Thursday 26th February 2009 13:18 GMT
It's just a colloquialism. Anything big and round in the sky is bound to incur flippant 'God' tags. Just be grateful it's not the Arse of God.
Posted Thursday 26th February 2009 13:26 GMT
Hmmm, i've had this image as my desktop wallpaper for over a year now, how come this story is being regurgitated ?
Posted Thursday 26th February 2009 13:54 GMT
Have you actually, physically met her?
For all you know, she could just be a figment of your over-active imagination.
"Just be grateful it's not the Arse of God. "
That's where we are at the moment, is it not. It would certainly explain the current levels of 'deep shit' we appear (to me anyway, but I could be imagining all this) to be experiencing.
Posted Thursday 26th February 2009 13:54 GMT
Good point - wouldn't take much photoshopping to turn it into the goatse of god :-O
Posted Thursday 26th February 2009 14:25 GMT
The impressivness of this image is that it is a ground based image. The well known versions of the Helix, the origional "Eye of God" pic that does the rounds is a Hubble image. This new image is an exemplar of the astounding strides made in ground based observations in the days since the HST first flew. There is a very good reason the James Webb telescope, if and, when, it finally flies won't be a visual wavelength 'scope. Since the HST flew visible wavlength astronomy from ground based telescopes has closed the gap and are now exceeding the HST's capability. Not just in light grasp (which they always had) but in raw resolution. Space based observations need to look at stuff we can't see from the ground to continue to justify themselves.
Go download the original image and have a look. All 85MB of it. Then compare with the NASA HST image. The ESA image has about twice the resolution. (And less noise.) Now THAT is impressive.
Posted Thursday 26th February 2009 14:25 GMT
If it's the "other end", wouldn't that be a black hole in the centre?
Though considering black holes tend to swallow matter than throw it out... anyone else remember the Red Dwarf episode about the planet where time travels backwards and the scene with the Cat at the end?
Posted Thursday 26th February 2009 14:25 GMT
I thought that happened every 28 days. on the "Full Moon"
..No worries, I've already got the coat.
Posted Thursday 26th February 2009 14:25 GMT
Surely that would be Eta Carinae: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:EtaCarinae.jpg
Somewhat ironically for the AC @13:43, part of the nearby Keyhole nebula is known as the Finger of God :o
Posted Thursday 26th February 2009 14:25 GMT
And as it's only one eye, it looks like it was the Norse that got it right!
For the eye of Sauron, cf. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/02/22/fomalhaut_image/
Posted Thursday 26th February 2009 15:20 GMT
Hang on just one little min
Just because it is called eye of god does not necersarilly infer that the namee beleives in god.
It represents what that individual can represent an image in his mind !
If i tell you i met a man with glowing Red eyes would you not have a picture in your mind as to what the eyes look like. Regardless of the fact you beleive my fancifull tales of a friday night.
And anyway i think its ceiling Cats eye !
Ceiling cat is watching you Mas........
Posted Thursday 26th February 2009 15:20 GMT
You non-deists preach tolerance the most loudly and yet are some of the least tolerant people I come across.
AC because I might be burned at the stake for disagreeing with non-religious nutters...
Posted Thursday 26th February 2009 15:33 GMT
Sir Isaac Newton, possibly the greatest scientist of all time, was also one of the biggest religious maniacs of his day. Meanwhile, the worst mass murderers in history (Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, Mao) were avowed humanists who denied the existence of god.
I'm not saying this to defend anyone's right to believe or not to believe anything, just that human behaviour is a lot more complex than some people on this thread seem to realise.
Paris, to try and distract some of you from your fulminations...
Posted Thursday 26th February 2009 16:14 GMT
I just got out of the wrong side of bed this morning. I was more disgruntled at the use of the word "obvious" than the word "god". The eye of god is a name that would simply never have occured to me is all...
And I am really not going to get into any frustrating and ultimately unresolvable arguments about religion or tolerance or anything else along those lines. I have many, many better ways of wasting time.
Posted Thursday 26th February 2009 22:17 GMT
I don't believe in gods, religion or any other hocus pocus, but nothing irritates me more when the arsehat brigade start acting oh-so-offended just because something has a name that sounds a bit religious.
You want to call Christmas 'The Holidays', go right ahead, but fuck off forcing other people to conform to your crybaby and extremely boring existence.
The truth is these people are just anti-Christian. You don't see them asking for Mars and Venus to be renamed or the Sun and Moon for that matter. No, but because someone used a bit of poetic license to name a giant gas cloud The Eye of God, they're getting their panties in a twist. Fuck off back to California where you belong.
Posted Thursday 26th February 2009 22:17 GMT
I'm in ur galaxy...
...watching u masturbate!
Posted Thursday 26th February 2009 22:17 GMT
Before she have up on us as a bad job and went off to create the rest of the universe based on inorganic chemistry.
http://asymptotia.com/2006/11/02/gods-final-message/
Posted Thursday 26th February 2009 22:17 GMT
But the first I heard about this was in the tabloid newspaper The Sun today. They excitedly stated that it would take light two and a half years to cross. And then when on to say that it could have whole galaxies in it.
Humm, me thinks that the Sun science editor (should such a post exist) would like to invest in an encyclopaedia that told them what the approximate diameter of a galaxy was. They may be rather surprised to find that it is a bit larger than 2.5 light years.
Mind you, it’s not as bad as the Pepsi re-brand that’s currently doing the rounds on the Internet. Search for Pepsi and breathtaking. They say that a light year is 671 million mile an hour.
As to jobs and who deserves them, I'll leave that to you.
Pad
Posted Friday 27th February 2009 00:52 GMT
Obviously no one has read "A Mote in God's Eye."
Posted Friday 27th February 2009 00:52 GMT
who wants to see the old "corkscrew" pic along side the new one to compare.
Posted Friday 27th February 2009 10:05 GMT
Jesus Christ, that thing's huge!
Posted Friday 27th February 2009 10:05 GMT
on AOL have picked up on this.
"If a teacher tells my kids I came from a chimpanzee there'll be trouble" is not atypical.
Posted Friday 27th February 2009 10:05 GMT
...by working tirelessly on thy Holy Contact Lens.
Posted Friday 27th February 2009 10:16 GMT
http://www.snopes.com/photos/space/eyeofgod.asp
Not one photo but a composiye - with colours 'enhanced".
July 2006
Posted Friday 27th February 2009 10:51 GMT
I gather there are actually quite a few different body parts to be found in the realm of the nebulae, although not all are suitable as publicity pictures... if you catch my drift.
Not sure how many have been ascribed to God, though.
Posted Friday 27th February 2009 13:04 GMT
http://www.snopes.com/photos/natural/godhands.asp
Posted Friday 27th February 2009 13:46 GMT
Heathens the lot of you. God is going to kick your arses straight to Hell.
HA HA HA :-)
Posted Friday 27th February 2009 16:17 GMT
Thank you for reminding me of Terry Bisson's "Their made out of meat!"
http://baetzler.de/humor/meat_beings.html
Posted Friday 27th February 2009 23:04 GMT
I like the way the eye follows you around the universe - very clever that.
And to annoy all the people getting het up about it being the eye of god I'm claiming it's the eye of the dragon of eternity in Sinfest.
Posted Monday 2nd March 2009 10:23 GMT
So calling it the eye of God is quite appropriate.