US regulators have run out of higher courts to appeal their long-standing case that memory maker Rambus tricked industry groups into an anticompetitive "patent ambush." The Supreme Court rejected the US Federal Trade Commission's request to resurrect antitrust accusations the District of Columbia Circuit tossed out in April. …
The irony is it was the government that gave Rambus a legal monopoly by granting them patent rights for an enormous list of revolutionary patents. Then the FTC sues them for having a monopoly on the market.
It is only a matter of time before Rambus wins the rest of their court battles. The previous claims that Rambus committed spoliation are so ridiculous as to suspect the judge was either incredibly incompetent or potentially bribed.
- Just TWO climate committee MPs contradict IPCC: The two with SCIENCE degrees
- Apple winks at parents: C'mon, get your kid a tweaked Macbook Pro
- Feature Scotland's BIG question: Will independence cost me my broadband?
- SOULLESS machine-intelligence ROBOT cars to hit Blighty in 2015
- China in MONOPOLY PROBE into Microsoft: Do not pass GO, do not collect 200 yuan