US regulators have run out of higher courts to appeal their long-standing case that memory maker Rambus tricked industry groups into an anticompetitive "patent ambush." The Supreme Court rejected the US Federal Trade Commission's request to resurrect antitrust accusations the District of Columbia Circuit tossed out in April. …
The irony is it was the government that gave Rambus a legal monopoly by granting them patent rights for an enormous list of revolutionary patents. Then the FTC sues them for having a monopoly on the market.
It is only a matter of time before Rambus wins the rest of their court battles. The previous claims that Rambus committed spoliation are so ridiculous as to suspect the judge was either incredibly incompetent or potentially bribed.
- iPad? More like iFAD: Now we know why Apple ran off to IBM
- +Analysis Microsoft: We're building ONE TRUE WINDOWS to rule us all
- Climate: 'An excuse for tax hikes', scientists 'don't know what they're talking about'
- Analysis Nadella: Apps must run on ALL WINDOWS – on PCs, slabs and mobes
- Major problems beset UK ISP filth filters: But it's OK, nobody uses them