Soylent Green on the school menus...

I think vegetarians should approve - the animals are dead already, why waste the oil?

The vege's who don't like the way we farm animals are looking at the other end of the cycle - the actual demand for animals as food. I could understand objections if the animals were being farmed just for their oils, but they aren't, it's a by-product. if it were just oil, the farmers would grow a plant it's easy to convert into heating oil - far more efficient.

Oh, although if the heating goes wrong and the smell of cooking bacon wafts through the school too often...

If they can refine the pigs/cows further (and throw in a touch of cat-cracking) trhey can produce Organic Petrol!

Of course this will then horrify the Greens, since it will allow guilt-free driving.

There could be problems with Organic Petrol though; if it contained pig-fat it would be neither Halal nor Kosher -and if it included rendered-down cows then Hindus could have a problem with it too.

Coat? The oiled-leather one.

So, let me get this right, instead of burning moo cows and baa lambs you want them to burn vegetarians?

Seems a bit extreme to me but I guess your average veggie does produce more methane than the average carnivore so I could see the figures working out from a greenhouse gas perspective.

Paris, I've had a crap day and I just want to OK?

Why should anyone suddenly have to start offering vegetarian heating fuels?

Coal, oil and natural gas are nothing like vegetarian .....

Seriously, though, the other important thing to note is that this initiative is specifically about using *inedible* biological materials, which probably would otherwise have ended up in shallow landfills, decomposing to methane; which in its unburned state is 20 times more damaging than its own combustion products.

One only has to ask them what they think produced the oil they fuel their cars and heat their homes with.

Answer lies in the grave...

1. Create new market for animal byproducts.

2. Make meat production cheaper.

3a. Make meat production more profitable. and/or

3b. Make meat consumption cheaper.

4. Anyway up, produce more greenhouse gases by producing more meat.

5. Label as a green initiative.

Looks confused, but also feels guilty about leather shoe wearing vegetarianism. Gains small amount of comfort as people of Norfolk hasten their slide in to the North Sea, confirming what everyone was thinking about them all along.

Flammable, because cows burn now, people burn later.

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn16573-eating-less-meat-could-cut-climate-costs.html?DCMP=OTC-rss&nsref=online-news

As a vegetarian I would insist that the local crematorium also be included in the co-generation of steam for heating. That would make things equal. Alternatively, rendered (lard? tallow?) from fat dead people (none of the fresh lipo stuff) could also be rendered in the same plant - it does say that *any* kind of animal could be used, right? If this is not feasible I'd have to sit outside the school window and listen in by wireless microphone - a bit cold this time of year. Alternatively, I could wear a water-cooling suit so as to not benefit from the heat.

Problem solved.

If they're imposing their "vegan way" on their kids, prepare for some really weak grownups in the future. I say let the kids decide: the animals are already going to be slaughtered, even if the vegans won't eat them.

Flames rise higher with animal fat, hence the icon.

Burning them in a boiler with a flue is a lot better at killing any germs that may be present than burning them on open bonfires, where the uncontrolled draughts can carry huge numbers of unharmed micro-organisms away from the fire. This is why we only started to see reductions in new foot-and-mouth cases in the 2001 outbreak when we switched to burying carcasses.

Using human corpses as fuel wouldn't be a bad idea, either -- how many megajoules are going up crematorium chimbleys without any attempt at recovery? I've often said I'd like to end up in a power station when I'm dead.

Glycerin derived from animal fat its found in cosmetics, foods, mouthwashes, chewing gum, toothpastes, soaps, ointments, medicines, lubricants, transmission and brake fluid, plastics ...

That is just one example, pretty much everything you own has some animal source materials in it. Yes there are often alternatives but many are not as good and all of them are a lot more expensive.

I am all in favour if this, (mind you, I am a veggie for health reasons, not animal welfare per-say [oh, and I don't give a monkeys for this so-called 'global-warming' malarky, sounds like a kettle of old fish to me... which brings me back to my main point...]) , why not recycle things that would otherwise go to waste? seems sound to me.

Anybody remember the Goodies episode featuring dogs as fuel in an open fire?

Norfolk, shouldn't that be turkeys they are burning ?

Just another initiative to reduce our carbon footprint.

If we just dump people into the furnace, particularly those who utter the words "carbon footprint", then no need to raise the animals for food, we can replant the rain forest torn down to raise cattle.

Used to be, people had common sense. If how they attained resources necessary for their survival mattered, they'd not put themselves in that position. This is not green, this about convenience and a mindless feel-good zombie sheep mentality. Sheep should not be exempt from the furnace if the cows and pigs are in line.

"Veggie kids <snip> should be give (naturally blown down) sticks to rub together.Probably still wet since they can't dry them out. Sooner they are out of the gene pool the better. And what to do with their scrawny little bodies....."

Did you just say that ? ? ?

*despair*

I don't know what's happening to old El Reg of late but the comments pages are starting to read like the Daily Mail. Ironically it has got me wondering "is our country going to the dogs?".

Certainly our country doesn't seem to have a basic grasp of economics. The creation of a new market for so called by-products makes the main product cheaper, you can't just ignore that although the proponents of this scheme seem determined to do exactly that.

Also, somewhere along the line people here seem to have got the it into their ignorant skulls that all vegetarians are somehow out to get them, take their cars away and force them to wear sandals, grow up! Vegetarians are just people who don't eat meat, there's no big conspiracy and they're entitled to their viewpoint just like you douches are.

As for you "Wize" with your... "they should be reminded that the plastics in their shoes and clothes are oil derrived. And that everything they have has some input from a meat eater. Turf them out naked in the snow."

Firstly, learn to fucking spell if you want to be taken seriously. Secondly, learn to think too.

The attitudes "use as little as you can" and "use as much as you can" are different and contradictory.

Also you seem to readily confuse the people who are adherents of "use as little as you can" attitude vis-a-vis fossil fuels with people who are vegetarian, a viewpoint about food that may be down to wealth, health, environmental concern, personal taste or religion.

Of course, I wouldn't turf you out in the snow for your obnoxious, ignorant opinions, but I might melt you down for your tallow.

Roger Heathcote.

"Blah blah moral high-ground, blah blah pompous twaddle, blah blah I'm cleverer than you, blah blah whinge whine grump moan insult shoot self in foot."

Sorry, had to paraphrase a little there, but surely someone of your intellect could recognise a joke when they see one? No? Oh well.