The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Google beds Microsoft for mobile sync service

Anonymous Coward

Nice 

Posted Tuesday 10th February 2009 08:36 GMT

Thumb Up

In terms of large evil companies, I like Microsoft more than Google. Its nice to see Ballmer beat Brin with something other than a chair.

Paul M.

Phil D. Space. Is there a Phil D.Space in here? 

Posted Tuesday 10th February 2009 09:17 GMT

Dead Vulture

"Interestingly, Microsoft’s pivotal role in Google’s planned service emerged as plans for Microsoft’s own online calendar and contacts service for mobile took another step forward."

The "interestingly" is sarcastic?

Dan

Eh? 

Posted Tuesday 10th February 2009 09:17 GMT

Thumb Down

I've not used a recent version admittedly, but Activesync always seemed pretty sh*t to me...

jake

So, basically ... 

Posted Tuesday 10th February 2009 09:17 GMT

... now both Microsoft AND Google have access to your company data?

Oh, yeah. THAT's something I'm going to be recommending to my clients.

Not.

Robert Grant

Goosync FTW 

Posted Tuesday 10th February 2009 10:09 GMT

Been keeping my Google Calendar and my Diamond in sync for 6 months now, works a treat.

Dave Morfee

cool... 

Posted Tuesday 10th February 2009 10:10 GMT

Paris Hilton

So does this mean I can use activesync to go get me gmail?

Tom Peach

@ jake 

Posted Tuesday 10th February 2009 10:58 GMT

No it means that Google have licensed the Exchange ActiveSync protocol. From TFA "ActiveSync will run on servers for Google Sync". So Microsoft will not have access to any additional info and your "clients" can rest easy.

Shame there is no decent (native) push email solution with Google Apps yet.

Anonymous Coward

Android? 

Posted Tuesday 10th February 2009 11:34 GMT

Whoops, there goes my main incentive to get an Android phone...

Eventually I suspect you'll be able to get Gmail (or Apps mail) through ActiveSync, but until then, I can still use IMAP, so not a huge problem...

Anonymous Coward

Why sync? 

Posted Tuesday 10th February 2009 12:21 GMT

Thumb Down

Why sync when you can do it live? Our company uses OpenHand (www.openhand-mobile.com) and we have total access to ALL our mails, not the last 100 (including all our contacts, calendars, etc.). It strikes me as strange when people even pay for a service that only gives limited access to emails like this. Then, I'd rather use google's webmail solution.

jake

@Tom Peach 

Posted Wednesday 11th February 2009 08:52 GMT

"No it means that Google have licensed the Exchange ActiveSync protocol. From TFA "ActiveSync will run on servers for Google Sync". So Microsoft will not have access to any additional info"

If you trust big business to do what you can easily do for yourself when it comes to your own private data, all I can say is "whatever" ... Follow your bliss, but don't expect me to tag along.

"and your "clients" can rest easy."

Actually, my clients rest easy because they control all their own data. Funny how that works.