Lol #
Posted Monday 2nd February 2009 12:56 GMT
Reminds me of that Max Headroom thingy from years gone by when the Dr Who got taken over lol
Posted Monday 2nd February 2009 12:56 GMT
Reminds me of that Max Headroom thingy from years gone by when the Dr Who got taken over lol
Posted Monday 2nd February 2009 14:38 GMT
May as well disable comments for this one, Lester. Doubt anyone will top that "wide receiver" strapline. Well done, sir !
Posted Monday 2nd February 2009 14:38 GMT
"showed a woman unzipping a man's trousers..."
Damn...
Another "wardrobe malfunction"
Posted Monday 2nd February 2009 14:38 GMT
We all know if an NRA operative didn't take a photograph, then it never happened!
Posted Monday 2nd February 2009 14:38 GMT
Not much more to say really. Will leave fellow El Reg readers to add additional penial puns involving such fine tags as stiff, hard, penetrate and more.
Paris, because in such a situation, she would reward her naughy staff with a big raise...
Posted Monday 2nd February 2009 14:38 GMT
Well, let's face it, you'd need something to break up the absolute monotony of American "Football"! Hell, even I'd watch it if it were interspersed with pron!
Roll on the Test Match: "She was only the batsman's daughter, but she could take a full toss in the crease!"
Posted Monday 2nd February 2009 14:38 GMT
... it's just replacing one lot of bollocks (Superbowl) with another set (Grumble flick)?
Purely coincidental that one of the companies involved is "Cox Communications" :-)
Paris, because she's only seen a cockatoo
Posted Monday 2nd February 2009 14:42 GMT
There was the case of some guy in an apartment block who like to video himself in grumble mode, and piped it into the back of his TV from where it leaked back into the rest of the building's cable network, treating his neighbours to views of new and unknown places.
Posted Monday 2nd February 2009 14:42 GMT
How many people rang their cable operator to complain and how many to enquire how they subscribe to the channel concerned
Bet the latter outweighed the former
Posted Monday 2nd February 2009 14:42 GMT
...this sort of puts wardrobe malfunctions with nipple glimpses and and the infamous "Godaddy.com" commercials into some form of context.
IT angle? Well this event could have been avoided if they had ID cards, Biometric Passports and Phorm installed.
Posted Monday 2nd February 2009 14:42 GMT
9 inch gain with good penetration by the female tight end, surely?
Posted Monday 2nd February 2009 16:22 GMT
I thought "great Brazilian" referred to soccer ...
Posted Monday 2nd February 2009 16:22 GMT
I'm annoyed that more is made of such tomfoolery than is made of gratuitous violence.
There was a television info-mercial the other evening where someone was asking if "that certain part of a man's anatomy" could be broken. The presenter stated that yes, "that part of a man's anatomy" can indeed break. WTF is wrong with saying "penis" on late-night television, cable or otherwise???
Posted Monday 2nd February 2009 19:02 GMT
Didn't something like this happen a few months ago? I think it was Australian football or rugby, but can't remember the details.
Posted Monday 2nd February 2009 23:04 GMT
"There was a television info-mercial the other evening where someone was asking if "that certain part of a man's anatomy" could be broken. The presenter stated that yes, "that part of a man's anatomy" can indeed break. WTF is wrong with saying "penis" on late-night television, cable or otherwise???"
Because the part of the anatomy they are talking about isn't the penis, silly! They never do say what part is being enlarged, or enhanced, or whatever. My guess is either the liver or the belly. Or perhaps the kidneys. Or possibly the prostrate. But it sure the heck ain't the penis.
No, I'm not going to waste my money finding out.
Posted Tuesday 3rd February 2009 02:17 GMT
Dear me! Does Playmobil do an "adult" range??? I must have missed out on that in my blatently sheltered youth...
Posted Tuesday 3rd February 2009 08:10 GMT
Here we go, NZ not AU rugby: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/07/07/prime_tv_blunder/
Also http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/08/22/sweidish_tv_outrage/
Still AC, as my search history is NSFW.
Posted Tuesday 3rd February 2009 09:52 GMT
In the mid nineties, when i were a lad and sailed the seven sea's with a yellow submarine,looking at pipelines (someone had to do it) we were dock in Den Helder on the German Dutch border, we had some nice video transmission kit on board to forward video links to a lay barge, although i had clearly labeled a video recorder "NO PORN VIDEO TRANSMITTER" i was sitting in a local coffee shop when the proprietor received a phone call, and promptly re-tuned the TV......
No one complained, When I said I'd have to go back to the ship and stop this, the gave me free weed to leave it on, 5 days of free weed no complaints talk about coals to Newcastle , bloody yanks complaining.
Posted Tuesday 3rd February 2009 09:52 GMT
It's only Neo jacking-in again... Agent Smith'll be along presently to sort it.
Mine's the one with the brand-new cellphone in the pocket. Still works dandy; only been dropped once.
Posted Tuesday 3rd February 2009 10:10 GMT
I was thinking the conspiracy that resulted in the elicit broadcast, which was almost certainly a Terrorist attack involving Optimus Prime (explaining why he was barred from entry into the US).
What you where thinking? Pervert!
Posted Wednesday 4th February 2009 02:34 GMT
Glad I was all done with dinner or you would have owed me a new monitor and keyboard.
Posted Wednesday 4th February 2009 22:10 GMT
"Still AC, as my search history is NSFW."
Oops! Are you sure about that?
Posted Monday 9th February 2009 06:50 GMT
Lets face it though, almost everyone watching football probably settled for that because it was too early for porn. So no harm done.
and yeah...It sounds familiar too me too..I think another story like this did happen quite recently.